barb162
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-15-04 12:32 AM
Original message |
Alan (I'm fighting for God) Keyes latest numbers ( IL Leader) |
|
Below are the numbers from the ILLINOIS LEADER. They only let you vote on this once and for days now Keyes has been running far ahead of Obama, like 3 to 1. Either the GOP moderates are going on the board there en masse or people are playing games or their computer is screwed up. I think it is HILARIOUS that Obama is winning by a large margin on this conservative rag site.
Who more clearly reflects the views of Illinois voters? Keyes (42.06%) Obama (55.79%) Undecided (0.70%)
|
benburch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-15-04 12:39 AM
Response to Original message |
1. The leader is mostly good for wrapping fish. |
|
But only because we don't have an outhouse that needs TP.
|
barb162
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-15-04 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. yuck-yuck and agree fishwrap is too good |
|
I am wondering if the numbers are correct. I would like to think they are...that a bunch of disgusted GOP types got on the website this weekend after listening to that horrible buffoon blabbing for 7 days now and they VOTED for OBAMA.
|
EST
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-15-04 10:59 AM
Response to Original message |
3. I have never heard of this paper, |
|
but I went over to the site and voted. Got message that I had already voted on this poll. WTF?!
|
EST
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-15-04 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Edited on Sun Aug-15-04 11:59 AM by RevRussel
Now I understand how their poll is structured. I am well and truly pissed that these idiots (Repuks) think we Illinois voters are so stupid (well--perhaps some are) that we can accept this race baiting ringer's coming here and cover for them. If there were any chance I might vote against Obama, and there is not, this would destroy it. The only way these twirps can win is by creating dissention and hate to divide us and unfortunately there are some uncritical folks who will fall for it. By the way, those numbers are moving up rapidly for Obama.
|
Nexus7
(225 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-05-04 04:14 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Ha ha ha the IL Leader |
|
I wouldn't know of the existence of the IL Leader but for the remarkable fact that it shows up disproportionately in news.google results when you search on 'Obama.' They expend a lot of ink on wacko opinions that will rag on Obama because he for example, draws breath 4X a minute or something. Their admiration for Keyes knows no bounds. It seems like it's just a bunch of opinions. I'm afraid Google's algorithms fail to do the relevant thing in such cases. There's some rag from the Young Repubs at UIUC that also shows up disproportionately.
The term for the state of such a poll I believe is "freeped."
|
barb162
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-05-04 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. I touch base on their website |
|
at least 4 times a week. They're already talking about running that nazi Rauschy for guv. And was there ever a lot of buzz on their discussion boards last week when Keyes at the RNC was going off half-cocked on the sexual hedonism thing and the way he was embarassing the IL delegation. It was a laugh riot! Here's their big savior making a total fool of himself.
At the same time, as a group they should not be taken lightly as they got enough votes to to force the few moderate Republicans to get that extremist Keyes here. That is nothing to sneeze at. They will keep running candidates as extreme as Keyes, just more toned down but just as vicious and intolerant in their views.
|
Radical Activist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-12-04 01:32 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Does that mean a victory for Obama is a loss for God |
|
in Illinois. This state is full of heathens!
|
barb162
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-13-04 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 05:51 AM
Response to Original message |