Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Question About Apartment Rentals

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Minnesota Donate to DU
 
jackieforthedems Donating Member (534 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 09:10 PM
Original message
A Question About Apartment Rentals
Edited on Tue Oct-12-04 09:11 PM by jackieforthedems
Hi! Thought someone on here may be able to answer my question. I have lived in an apartment complex since 2001, and have never had to pay for water, sewer and trash before. Suddenly, this last Saturday while signing my new 1 year lease, I was told that it is now my responsibility to pay a monthly trash-water/sewer bill that will fluctuate from month to month in amount. There are no individual water meters, etc... in the apartments here, and how can this be? I felt really pressured to sign the new lease because I wasn't planning to move, but they never said a thing to me prior to the lease signing about this new plan to bill everyone for trash and water, etc... Is this something new going on in the Twin Cities, is it legal, and who would I call to get an answer on this - the Attorney General or who? It just doesn't seem right or fair, and that's why I had chosen to live in an apartment - to get out of bills like this. I feel like I should own my apartment for having to pay these bills. It's like having to pay an association fee in a condo or town house. Thanks for all replies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
deadmessengers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. don't know if it's legal or not.
...but it's a shitty business practice, and probably a BIG mistake. He may have surprised you with this one, but now word will get around among the tenants, and people will be ready to tell him to shove his water bill up his ass when their leases are up. Vacancy related costs such as lost rent and apartment reconditioning eat up a landlord's profits more than anything else, so that'll hurt him more than not having to pay a water bill would. He'd have been better off just raising the rent and passing the charge on to you that way - tenants expect rent increases at the end of their leases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catchthefever Donating Member (121 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Just guessing...
I think you'll be charged an average for the entire complex. So, if your neighbor likes taking 30 minute showers twice daily, and you take 5 minute showers once daily, you will help carry your neighbors burden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
delete_bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nothing illegal about this, it's happening
everywhere. In the past, these expenses were not that great, so apartments were not individually metered. As costs continue to increase, apartment owners, particularly in the larger, corporate owned complexes, decide to have the tenants pay for these services.

Often they contract with companies who specialize in utility billing services to handle this. The usual way of handling this is to allocate on a square footage basis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. My former apartment complex in Portland started doing this
after years of including utilities in the rent.

We didn't have individual meters either, so they just had an outside company levey a standard percentage of the total charges for the building on each tenant, based on the number of bedrooms in their apartment. In other words, a two-bedroom apartment was charged twice as much as a one-bedroom apartment. The problem was that some of the two-bedroom apartments were occupied by one person while some of the one-bedroom apartments were occupied by two people. Also, the utility bills fluctuated so much from month to month--totally irrespective of what the individual tenant did--that the tenants finally rebelled.

The managers allowed us to switch back to "utilities included in the rent" as our leases came up for renewal, but the damn outside company kept billing us for months afterwards, even though our manager kept calling them to tell them who was still on the program and who wasn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackieforthedems Donating Member (534 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thanks, Everyone Who Replied
Yes, this new plan will sure be interesting - especially, when you start to think about the pool, the jacuzzi, and the water sprinklers, not to mention what the housekeeping and maintenance crews use as well. I know when my lease expires in September 2005, they can shove their place! I'll definitely be a home owner and know that all expenses incurred will really be mine. Thanks to all who responded! I appreciate your replies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thegonagle Donating Member (548 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
6. Looks like it's legal as long as they follow the guidelines.
Edited on Wed Oct-13-04 11:31 AM by Thegonagle
Read up:

http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/504B/215.html

I previously thought that this was illegal, but I guess I was wrong.

EDIT: It looks like they might not be allowed to hit you up until your current lease is up. I'm not sure, because I'm busy doing other things at the moment, and was merely skimming the statute.

Good luck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackieforthedems Donating Member (534 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yeah, Guess It Is Legal
Edited on Wed Oct-13-04 02:14 PM by jackieforthedems
and it apparently has something to do with the Bush environmental bill/law to help conserve water, etc... They think if you are forced to pay for it, that you'll use less of it. Actually, I had heard something else regarding water on PBS about 2 months ago, a documentary called, "Thirst" - it has something to do with the World Bank and how alot of business is profiting by selling water. Guess that bottled water we all buy may have been some sort of a test?!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Minnesota Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC