SteppingRazor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-14-08 03:20 PM
Original message |
Hey Minnesotans! Question about the Senate race: What's the Barkley influence there? |
|
Franken has finally just barely pulled even with Coleman. Were it not for Barkley, would this be a blow out? Or does he pull fairly equally from both sides?
Thanks in advance for setting me straight! :)
|
dflprincess
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-14-08 03:34 PM
Response to Original message |
1. According to the article in the Star Tribune |
|
that reported on the Minnesota Poll showing Franken up by 10; Barkley is hurting Coleman more.
|
CatholicEdHead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-14-08 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. Historically the polls do show Republicans loosing votes |
|
up until election day. Then the trend is the Republicans bail back to the party and many DFLers follow through with voting for the alternate candidate.
I do expect the Independence Party to renew their major party status in the state with the percentage and number of votes that Barkley will get no matter what else happens.
|
Lydia Leftcoast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-14-08 03:37 PM
Response to Original message |
2. My impression is that he pulls some from both sides |
|
Edited on Tue Oct-14-08 03:37 PM by Lydia Leftcoast
Al Franken was the majority favorite though not the overwhelming favorite in the endorsement race, but his main opponent was a peace activist whose political opinions were in Kucinich/Sanders/DeFazio territory, not a muddled centrist like Barkley. There were other candidates who were more conventional but who didn't do as well. Some of their supporters may go for Barkley.
Coleman had solid Republican support until he voted for the bailout, which infuriated ordinary people here as everywhere else. After that vote, a number of the usual wingnuts who rant and rave on the Star-Tribune's website declared that they were going to vote for Barkley.
Barkley doesn't have the appeal to suburban and rural macho wannabes that Jesse Ventura had, so I doubt that he would win, but anything can happen.
|
SteppingRazor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-14-08 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Oh, I'm not worried in the least about Barkley winning. I'm just worried about the spoiler effect... |
|
the concern, of course, being that Franken would win were it not for Barkley, whose views appear to be closer to Franken's than Coleman's.
|
Eric J in MN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-14-08 06:01 PM
Response to Original message |
5. If Al Franken loses, I won't blame it on there being a third candidate. |
|
Edited on Tue Oct-14-08 06:01 PM by Eric J in MN
Franken has generally done better in the polls since Barkley entered the race.
|
Tigress DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-16-08 12:49 AM
Response to Original message |
6. He's a scary man. Makes me want to barf. |
MnFats
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-16-08 08:08 PM
Response to Original message |
7. listening to the debate? Barkley re: budget problems crop up at end of ventura term? |
|
Barkley is claiming he & Ventura had a wonderful budget/school plan but the DFL and GOP fuckd it up?
I seem to remember Ventura being the one most responsible for the finance fuckup at the end of the Ventura term? anyone refresh my memory please?
|
dflprincess
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-16-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. That would be my recollection |
|
- the reduction in license tab fees because Jesse owned several expensive vehicles. The tax rebate checks that were sent because "the surplus belongs to all the taxpayers". (Strange how when there's a deficit it only belongs to the people on some kind of assistance or the schools.) Yep, I'd say Ventura had a big hand in screwing the state up.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 01st 2024, 05:43 AM
Response to Original message |