Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Recount 2004

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Ohio Donate to DU
 
cmd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 09:02 PM
Original message
Recount 2004
Just back from the courthouse.
The process:
* Two deputies carried the ballots in sealed boxed into the computer room.
* The BOE did a test run of the machines.
* Two precincts that made up about 3% of the vote were selected for a hand recount.
*Six teams of counters and observers were given ballots from the two precincts. Three teams counted one precinct. Three teams counted the other. My team was made up of a Republican counter; a Democratic counter; and observers from the Republican, Democratic and Green parties. I was a Democratic observer.
*The observers sat opposite the counters. The counters each took half of the pile of cards assigned them. They first sorted the ballots by holding each ballot up and looking for the punched holes on the left side of the ballot. They were only recounting the presidential vote; and were only concerned with the numbers 4,6, 8 and 10. Provisional ballots from the precinct were included in the count. Absentee ballots were counted separately.
* During this time I watched to see that there were no over or under votes and that the ballots were put into the correct pile. I did not see a single hanging chad. There were over votes and undervotes (no vote at all).
* After sorting the ballots, the counter stacked them neatly and held them up to the light. You could see through the hole when the ballots were sorted correctly.
*The counter then began counting the ballots and recording the outcome.
*The counters then switched piles and repeated the procedure with the other half of the stack.
*The report for each team was given to the director of the BOE. He and the elections board totaled the results. The ballots were run through the computer.
*One precinct came out with the same numbers as the computer. The second precinct was incorrect and was counted two more times by the other three teams. The results were off by one vote each time.
*At this time, the recount was suspended for the evening. We will meet again later in the week to count that precinct again. If the results are still off, it may mean a hand recount for the entire county.
I do not know which candidate benefited from the one vote. The candidates were rotated on the ballots for each precinct. We were not told the position of the candidates on the ballot. I considered the recount very fair and very impartial. It's a difficult process, but important in making sure every vote is counted correctly.
If you have any questions, please ask. I'll try to answer. cmd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whalerider55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. thanks
having been involved in arecount on the local level once myself, i appreciate what you are doing.

fwiw, i caught three votes in my recount that allowed a very wonderful progressive city counselor to take a seat that the first count had shown she had lost. there's a chance she may be the next mayor here.

whalerider55

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks for your report and
for being there. Must be an interesting process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleiku52cab Donating Member (674 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Couple questions
Edited on Tue Dec-14-04 09:13 PM by pleiku52cab
Who selected the 2 precincts? Any info you can give in what counties, or cities, and who won the original presidential majority of votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. The Board of Elections selected the precincts.
They were two very rural precincts in my rural county. One precinct voted 442 - 363 in favor of Kerry. The other voted 341 -185 in favor of Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. No surprise that things are set up carefully.
Sounds like it would be in the best interest of many that a county wide handcount is triggered.

Were the totals from the machines the same totals from Nov. 2nd?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I'm sure they were different from Nov. 2
The provisionals had not been added in at that time. I don't know if the were different from the certified vote, but assume that the one precinct was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleiku52cab Donating Member (674 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. And if I remember correctly
Isn't that 'repairman' in Green Co. being accused of attempting to set the tally in the machine to correspond to the actual vote - as in CYA about any machine tampering that went on during or before the election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I don't know anything about Green Co.
Do you have a link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keithjx Donating Member (758 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. Hey cmd
You ROCK!!! Thanks for this report. I am envious that you are part of this process and wish I could be there too. Thank you and those you witnessed for protecting our democracy.

:toast:

Keithjx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Wish you were here, too
In fact, if we have a full recount, I want the entire Underground here! Cheers!:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsConduct Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. Thanks for all the hard work. If I was there, I'd help you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trudyco Donating Member (975 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. You needed to know which position was for Kerry and which
for Bush, don't you? Then you need to verify that the positions are the same for that precinct as somebody who was there on election day found it. Otherwise, if the hand and automatic recount show perfect correlation you can say "oh no fraud here" when in fact they just frauded you right under your nose.

They can say that position 8 was for Bush and it tallies with the "official" count but in fact on election day they told everybody in that precinct that position 6 was for Bush. So they just flipped the Kerry and Bush votes by saying Bush was in Kerry's position and vice versa. You need to know which position is supposed to be Bush and Kerry in the recount and then verify with people who were in that precinct on election day.

I mean, why wouldn't they tell you which position was which candidate? Maybe so you can't verify?

trudyco
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. The head of our group knew the positions
I really think it was better not knowing. I was able to look at the ballot without prejudice. The count was what was important. I don't want any voters to be disenfranchised - even if they voted for the man I detest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trudyco Donating Member (975 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. who was the head of the group? Dem, Repub or Glib?
DId they also know what the position was supposed to be on election day?

trudyco
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I was on the Democratic team
Our leader had all the info on the positions. The positions were the same on election day. The Republicans and Greens ( who were represented by Democrats in our county) also had access to the rotations for each precinct. The BOE director is a Democrat. The Democratic counter on my team was a Kerry delegate. We were very well represented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Ohio Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC