theredstate
(144 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-14-06 11:59 PM
Original message |
Juan Garcia need your help on the Caller Times poll |
|
The Corpus Christi Caller Times is conducting a web poll.
It reads:
Does the recent double homestead exemption situation for State Rep. Gene Seaman and his wife have any bearing on your future vote?
(1) Yes, more likely to vote for him
(2) Yes, less likely to vote for him
(3) No change
Go give Juan a hand, go to www.caller.com and scroll down the bottom of the left hand column and select #2.
Vote early, Vote often.
|
PDittie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-15-06 05:44 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Yes, less likely at 65.1% |
|
as of a moment ago (95 votes). Juan is officially a shoe-in.
|
STxDem
(8 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-15-06 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Is the poll still open? |
merci_me
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-15-06 11:29 AM
Response to Original message |
3. I can't get into the poll |
|
They have old polls up and I can get into those, but the current one only shows the results, but no cursor action. Choice 2 is at 68%, so going well. I'll try again later.
|
sonias
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-15-06 11:56 AM
Response to Original message |
|
(1) Yes, more likely to vote for him 12.0 % (23)
(2) Yes, less likely to vote for him 67.7 % (131)
(3) No change 20.3 % (39)
I haven't been able to vote often. :evilgrin:
Sonia
|
merci_me
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-15-06 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. I finally got the poll to show but............... |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-15-06 12:39 PM by merci_me
it said 131, like Sonias results and after I voted, it STILL shows 131. We'll have to keep up on this.
Editing to say, I just went back and now it's 134, so maybe it's just slow recording the votes.
|
2bfree
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-15-06 11:06 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:17 AM
Response to Original message |