Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Latest CPAC/SES poll

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 02:45 PM
Original message
Latest CPAC/SES poll
Edited on Wed Jan-18-06 02:46 PM by daleo
CPAC-SES Nightly Tracking (1,200 Canadians, 1,010 Decided Voters)Federal Ballot:
CPC 37%,
Lib 32%,
NDP 18%,
Bloc 10%,
Green 4%

The Globe reported 42 to 24 today (18 points), this one has a 5 point difference.

Note that this adds to 101, so someone is getting a slight bump from rounding.

Edited to add link.
http://www.sesresearch.com/main.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClusterFreak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. I believe the gap is closing.....
....certainly not that it's an 18 point lead. Globe and Mail/CTV poll is typically skewed to favour their right wing views. I think the gap will close enough to only hand Harpo a minority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
V. Kid Donating Member (616 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No actually...
Edited on Wed Jan-18-06 06:57 PM by V. Kid
...the methadology is simply suspect. The poll asks leading questions before, such as "who has the momentum", that tends to lead people to think gee if X, has the mometum, and I'm leading towards X, I should then vote for X. It has nothing to do with them being biased, they're just not very smart, just think me defending the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's one way you skew polls on purpose
Edited on Wed Jan-18-06 07:13 PM by daleo
Anyone running a polling firm will know better than to do that if he/she wants an objective result. It is pretty basic social science methodology.

Potential sources of bias:
- non-response bias (e.g. phone polls only get people with land lines who answer pollsters).
- question order.
- leading questions/wording.
- post-analysis sifting of data ("likely voters, very likely voters", etc).
- over and under sampling in certain regions and/or demographics that can be trusted to give the responses you want.
- post-analysis re-weighting in intended directions
- not reporting polls that don't give the answers you want (depends how much money you have to spend).
- selectively reporting data that is favorable to one side, ignoring that which is not favorable.

Some of these are unavoidable, some can be done on purpose.

The best guess on how valid a poll will be is simply who commissioned it, in my opinion. Probably the best polls are those done by the political parties themselves, but are not reported.

On edit - Post-analysis is bad wording. I really mean post-survey, at the data analysis stage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
V. Kid Donating Member (616 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. BC results, reputible pollster:
http://www.mustelgroup.com/pr/20060119.htm

A recent Mustel Group poll taken among a random sample of 1,002 BC adults indicates that the Conservative Party has taken a strong lead in BC, garnering 38% of the decided vote. The NDP and Liberal Party are essentially tied in second place, with 29% intending to vote for the NDP and 27% planning to support the Liberal Party in the up-coming federal election.

These levels are similar to those posted by the parties in the June 2004 federal election. However, given that one-third of BC’s seats were decided by less than 5% margins in the last election, there could be changes in the seat allocation by party.

The Conservatives have the lead in the suburbs of Greater Vancouver and in the interior. The Liberals lead in the City of Vancouver, whereas the NDP have a dominant position on Vancouver Island (including Victoria) and in the Burnaby/New Westminster area.

In addition, the Liberals are the party of choice among those of Chinese descent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. We will know in a few days
I don't have any frame of reference for this polling group. Do they say who commissioned the poll?

I saw their "record of accuracy" page. It is nice that they are sticking their necks out, but they could be cherry picking favorable results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Yeah. The Elections Canada poll is pretty accurate.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I believe so
I don't know if every country can make that claim though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. It'd be nice if the U.S. sent teams up here on Monday,
to take notes and observe how it should be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
V. Kid Donating Member (616 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. I think they did themselves.
Edited on Fri Jan-20-06 01:29 AM by V. Kid
They're a BC based company that mostly does samples for the BC scene, provincially and federally. They were only one point off for the last BC election. They seem to have solid methadology, and before elections don't really seem to deliver stinkers. And while the other regional results from the bigger polling companies are all over the map, they seem to match things well enough.

Don't get me wrong, I hope the Conservatives fall somewhat. But unfortunatley there's a lot of voters here who believe that simply voting the bums out, with whomever is most likely to kick the bums out, is the best idea, regardless of ideolgy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Thanks for that info
I analyze survey data (not specifically political data though) on my job sometimes, so I don't dispute the scientific basis of polling. I also have a number of courses on survey theory and practice, so I know that a well done, objective poll does give good information. I also know that there are lots ways to bias a poll, so that is why I sometimes express some skepticism.

I guess my preferred result would be a Liberal-NDP minority, but a more solid one than the shifting alliances of the last election.

I suppose I don't trust the current bunch of Conservatives, coming from Alberta as I do. They can't fool me with feigned moderation - I know this lot too well. These are not your Joe Clark types, nor even your Brian Mulroney types.

I don't expect everyone here to cheer-lead for the Liberals or NDP, though. Honest, intelligent debate is fine by me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harper_is_Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. The Globe uses "strategic council", which is being ridiculed in
the media today.

They are owned by a long-time conservative pollster, and it IS CTV and Globe&Mail, after all.

Angus Reid dropped them from thier tracking list after yesterdays result, which was the 18 point difference one. Juuuuust a bit out of step!

The real difference is 5/6%, as is confirmed by two other polls reflecting the same thing.

After tonights appearance on "your turn" Harper should be finnished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Strategic Council
The name says it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. The media is ridculing that poll.
Wonderful!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. They are saying 37-29 today
I guess the Globe and Strategic Council decided that they had to come back to reality some, or they would be laughed out of the joint. I expect a "big push" could still be in store from them, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC