Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ten years since Tony Blair secured the Labour leadership

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » United Kingdom Donate to DU
 
RFKHumphreyObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 11:52 AM
Original message
Ten years since Tony Blair secured the Labour leadership
Edited on Wed Jul-21-04 11:59 AM by socialdemocrat1981
Special feature on the BBC Website

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3827555.stm

I am unable to believe that it has been that long -it seems like only yesterday that he became Labour leader
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. I have never understood Tony's
attachment to *. That left me quite frankly dumbfounded seeing as how they are (or should be?) at opposite ends politically. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brian Morans Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. He is first and foremost a politician...
I know some say politics is the art of compromise, but he has spent his career abandoning his so-called heartfelt ideals and deeply-held beliefs whenever it was politically expedient. It's a complete mystery why he continues to bend over, allowing Bush to violate and humiliate him as he has. He should walk away. He should resign, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
D-Notice Donating Member (820 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Not sure if I've said this before, but
I honestly think he's being blackmailed. I fail to see what he's gained from the last 3 yrs:

Destroyed the public's trust in himself

Destyoed his own credibility

Destroyed the public's trust in labour

Made the Tories more popular

Made the LibDems to main left-wing party

Not sure how reliable these are but:

IndyMedia Melbourne

IndyMedia UK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. John Smith dies
Tony Blair lives...always the way, although who knows what would have happened had John Smith lived, sometmies I think he was far too decent to be a pollie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StandUpGuy Donating Member (392 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. John Smith
My Mum lives in Scotland and swears John Smith was murdered by the corporate elite that new Labor was about to sweep to power on an Anyone But Major vote. Paving the way for Blair, Brown and the New Labor hijack.

Any comments ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. His family was a friend of my family's
when we stilled lived in Scotland and my sister still keeps in touch with one of his daughter sporadically, while I guess it's possible that someone caused either of both of his two heart attacks I think it's unlikely
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StandUpGuy Donating Member (392 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. It is and will remain one of the great...
What ifs.

He would have been a great PM.

I was living in Edinburgh when it happened and the nation did mourn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I could be really parochial
and say something along the lines of Blair being English and Scot's making better lefties....:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LondonAmerican Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Why do I keep hearing that Blair is from Scotland?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. He was born there
though his family is English; and he did go to school in Edinburgh for a bit.

http://www.number10.gov.uk/output/page4.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. that SO doesn't count
that's just trying to appeal to Scots who can be pretty territorial, a friend of mine spent a year at school in Japan, doesn't make her Japanese.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. And I don't think he ever calls himself Scottish
to be fair, or plays it up in any way. I was just explaining why sometimes some people say he's from Scotland. His birth would, for instance, qualify him to play sport for Scotland, as well as England.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I really regret John Smith too!
I'm sure he died of natural causes, but it's so sad anyway! While no doubt he'd have had his faults as PM, he would never have been the spin-loving right-winger that Blair is!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. It does count, however, that Brown IS scottish
THe heir appearant is scottish, john reid, and several other cabinet
members are audibly scottish when they speak.

Methinks blair's heart is closer to the catholic irish than scottish.
Either way, his government has seen scotland the laggard of the
economic regions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. What do you make of this then sweetheart?
From an old but very good article by Boris Johnson which I may well post as a thread in its own right in the near future.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2004/04/29/do2902.xml

And the third reason why Blair will stay and fight is of course that there is no one to take his place. He is New Labour, for better or worse. Straw? Pshaw. Blunkett? Junk it. As for Gordon Brown, and the idea that the baton could be smoothly passed to the Chancellor - cheated of his birthright for a mess of seared tuna at Granita - it is fanciful. Even if it were possible, technically, to effect such a transition, it would be an insult to democracy, not least because Brown, like so many other Labour members, sits for a Scottish seat, and is currently passing laws for England when English MPs have no say over those questions in Scotland, and above all when he, Gordon, has no say over those questions in Scotland. I would go so far as to say that the West Lothian question is now so acute that no sitting Scottish MP has a hope of becoming prime minister.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
limeyrose Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. Blackmail? Or a stooge?
>>I honestly think he's being blackmailed. I fail to see what he's gained from the last 3 yrs:

It's not possible that he was planted in the first place, was it? Funded from outside the UK? It's the way he so suddenly emerged as front-runner for the leadership when John Smith died. I wonder who is pulling his strings?

Or am I just a disillusioned old cynic?

Rosie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-04 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Hi limeyrose!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyskank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. There's something of the neocon about Blair
Edited on Fri Aug-06-04 01:08 PM by billyskank
I feel. He's always been keen on military interventions. True, he always does it for humanitarian reasons (apart from Iraq - I think that was different) rather than the reasons of the Machiavellians in the Bush administration. But these humanitarian reasons are why so many others support the warmongers in the White House and give them the cover they need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » United Kingdom Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC