Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sigh.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » United Kingdom Donate to DU
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 06:05 AM
Original message
Sigh.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x1674992

Comprehension so limited it's hardly worth arguing. I hammered the alert button like a pinata.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Anarcho-Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. It annoys me when people don't bother to read the article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Not only that, look at what I collected in less than 5 minutes
when I googled The Special Reconnaissance Regiment:


http://www.news.mod.uk/news_headline_story.asp?newsItem_id=3210
from the Ministry of DEFENCE

New Special Forces Regiment for the British Army
Published Tuesday 5th April 2005

On 5 April 2005 the Secretary of State for Defence, Geoff Hoon MP, announced the creation of a new "Special Reconnaissance Regiment", which has been formed to meet a growing worldwide need for special reconnaissance capability.

In a written statement to Parliament, Mr Hoon declared the 'Special Reconnaissance Regiment' (SRR) will be operational from April 6th 2005. Defence Secretary Geoff Hoon said:

"The creation of the Special Reconnaissance Regiment demonstrates our commitment to shaping our Armed Forces to meet the ongoing challenge of tackling international terrorism. The new Regiment will help to meet the growing need for special reconnaissance capability."

The new Regiment has been formed to meet a growing worldwide demand for special reconnaissance capability - as announced in the Strategic Defence Review New Chapter in July 2004.
*****
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4412907.stm
Special forces regiment created

The new regiment will provide support for overseas operations
A new special forces regiment is to be operational from Wednesday, Defence Secretary Geoff Hoon has announced.

The Special Reconnaissance Regiment, or SRR, will provide specialist support for overseas operations, particularly those against international terrorism.
*****
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1452963,00.html
Hoon creates special forces regiment

Richard Norton-Taylor
Wednesday April 6, 2005
The Guardian

A new special forces regiment has been formed to conduct covert surveillance operations, mainly in pursuit of international terrorists, the defence secretary, Geoff Hoon, announced yesterday.

The Special Reconnaissance Regiment, the SRR, is the first special forces unit to be created since the end of the second world war and will be based in Hereford, home of the SAS.

The regiment, consisting of women as well as men, will be fully operational from today. The Ministry of Defence refused to disclose its size of but it is likely to be less than half the size of the SAS, which consists of some 450 elite troopers.

Of course using the term "Death Squad" is much more exciting and gets way more attention.

People who want the truth go out in search of it.

Armchair detectives just want stimulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frederik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. You're talking about your own comprehension
I gather?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Why not come for a visit, Frederik?
You seem to have some very odd ideas about the UK. You should come and see it. It's really not the scary place you seem to think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frederik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I'm very well acquainted
with the United Kingdom, thank you. :-)

London is my second favourite city, after Paris.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I'm pleased you like my city.
I know that America is having a terrible time under Bush, but things really aren't that degraded under Blair. He's a poor leader, but the reason we take exception to terms like "death squad" is because it simply isn't true. Certainly, we may be dealing with a rogue police unit or something like that, but we really don't know, and it is certainly not the policy of the Met to gun down innocents because "they look a bit brown" - nor the policy of special forces, for that matter. London is one of the most diverse cities on the planet, possibly the most diverse, and a policy like that would lead to the city being on fire before you can say "April 1981".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. Just the usual kneejerk reaction you get on DU I'm afraid.
:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tenshi816 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. Taxloss, you might be able to answer this
question for me.

I've been on holiday in Florida for a couple of weeks, arriving back in the UK yesterday, and have been out of the loop on UK news due to not watching television and having no internet access while I was in the States. On the flight back home, the only newspaper available to passengers was the Daily Mail and there was a mention in the letters section yesterday that the Brazilian man who was killed was an illegal alien in the UK. Do you know if this is true?

If it is, it would explain why he seemed "suspicious" (fear of being deported), and it seems to me that since he was pinned down anyway, why the hell didn't they just arrest him instead of killing him? Dead men don't really respond well to interrogation.

Like I said, I have no idea if it's true that he was illegal, and I take everything in the Mail with a grain of salt until I see it confirmed elsewhere.

Thanks in advance if you can enlighten me (and I apologise if this has been discussed to death already on DU).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Apparently his visa had expired.
Technically, he was illegal, but it wasn't as if he had crept into the country or anything - he was welcomed in to study and work.

But what exactly happened in the Tube station - between De Menezes debarking his bus and his death - is a grey area. No thorough account has yet emerged. What is known is that he used his travelcard to enter the station, contrary to early accounts that stated he had jumped the barriers. Did he "look suspicious"? I haven't a clue. I look fairly suspicious, but that's because I haven't shaved today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tenshi816 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. No, I have no idea if he "looked suspicious" either.
It's just what my neighbour said yesterday when I asked her about it, but she didn't know about the expired visa/illegal aspect either.

There was a period of about six months when I too lived in the UK on an expired visa before I was granted permanent residency. I was in perpetual fear of being found out and deported, so reading that De Menezes was in the same situation explained a lot to me. If someone who appeared to be in a position of authority had started pursuing me after my visa expired, I'd have run too. In fact, I probably still would and I've been a legal UK resident for nearly 20 years (and will hopefully be a naturalised citizen within a few more months).

What a horrible and undeserved thing to happen to that poor man. I will never understand why he was killed instead of simply detained for questioning. It would have been discovered very quickly that they had arrested the wrong person, and De Menezes would still be alive.

Thanks for the info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » United Kingdom Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC