Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

De Menezes 'shot for 30 seconds'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » United Kingdom Donate to DU
 
Briar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 06:04 AM
Original message
De Menezes 'shot for 30 seconds'
De Menezes 'shot for 30 seconds'

Witness feared terrorists were attacking train as police fired at Brazilian, leaked statement reveals

Vikram Dodd and Hugh Muir


Armed police officers fired at Jean Charles de Menezes for over 30 seconds when they killed him at Stockwell tube station, according to a witness statement made to independent investigators and obtained by the Guardian.

The witness says the shots were fired at intervals of three seconds and that she ran for her life fearing terrorists had opened fire on commuters...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/attackonlondon/story/0,16132,1556856,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. I find this whole incident to be so weird....
I was under the impression they didn't start shooting him until they had him pinned down. Why did they shoot 10 or 11 times? Why did they shoot him at all if they had him down?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Briar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 06:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. What I find weirder
is the obvious reluctance of our great and good to condemn the shoot to kill policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Shoot to kill on mere suspicions is unthinkable...
many innocent people could be shot because they look or act suspicious for various reasons or to someones erroneous interpretation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
non sociopath skin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Sounds increasingly as if some of it wasn't "shoot to kill" ...
... in that the poor guy was well dead when some of the shots were pumped into him.

I work on the assumption that a firearms ace has at least some idea of the firepower it needs to kill someone. So why the fcuk did they keep on firing?

The Skin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrfrapp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. That's a Long Time
When discussing this subject with people who seem to like the idea of killing people willy-nilly I've made the point about how long it must have taken to fire off seven head shots. The point being that if they won't concede "shoot-to-kill" being a bad idea, that they should at least recognise that in this case the killing was unnecessarily brutal. That the gunmen should have realised after say, the second head shot at the most, they should think to themselves, "hey, perhaps this guy is dead already". I've counted off ten seconds or so to illustrate just how long the gunmen must have had to think about, to realise what they were doing but I didn't my wildest imaginings think they devoted a whole 30 seconds to his execution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. Eleven shots in thirty seconds?
I sincerely doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » United Kingdom Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC