Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Voters to challenge US election--Why no US media attention?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 09:03 PM
Original message
Voters to challenge US election--Why no US media attention?
Edited on Thu Dec-02-04 09:11 PM by tuvor
More anecdotal proof of no such thing as liberal media in USA. Now seriously, just what in HELL is keeping this out of the American news?????????????????

Wednesday December 1, 2004
The Guardian

George Bush's victory in the US presidential election will be challenged in Ohio's supreme court today, when a group of Democratic voters will allege widespread fraud.
President Bush clinched re-election by winning the state of Ohio on November 2 by a margin of 136,000 votes over the Democratic candidate, John Kerry. Despite claims of fraud and technical glitches, Senator Kerry decided that they were not big enough to affect the result and conceded the election on November 3.

However, Cliff Arnebeck, a lawyer representing a group of voters challenging the Ohio result, claimed new analysis of various anomalies suggested it was rigged.

"We'll be calling for a reversal of the result based on evidence developed in the course of litigation," Mr Arnebeck told The Guardian yesterday. "Exit polling and substantial irregularities excluded votes that should have been counted. There is evidence that votes cast for one candidate were moved to the column of the other candidate."


http://www.guardian.co.uk/uselections2004/story/0,13918,1363399,00.html

:mad: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Seriously.
One would think this would be of historic import.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobbes199 Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Finally able to do something useful...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. One more time. Because the MEDIA is part of the SCAM!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. That's my opinion, too.
But I guess I was rhetorically asking the media.

Kind of like when you post on DU, "george, you rotten sonofa..." knowing full well that even if he COULD read it, he wouldn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berniew1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Miami Herald hand recount of 3 Florida counties shows big Kerry gain
Miami Herald hand recount of 3 Florida counties indicates signficant Kerry gain and possible Kerry win in Florida

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/20021...

Here are the tallies for Union County:

Bush original: 3396 Bush hand count: 3393 (-3)

Kerry original: 1251 Kerry hand count: 1272 (+21)

Net change: Kerry +24

Here are the tallies for Lafayette County:

Bush original: 2460 Bush hand count: 2452 (-8)

Kerry original: 845 Kerry hand count: 848 (+3)

Net change: Kerry +11

It's a bit more complicated for the third county they looked at, Suwannee County, because they only report the totals for a hand

count of "almost 60%" of the ballots. Here is the result of their 60% hand count:

Bush 60% hand count: 6140

Kerry 60% hand count: 2984

Which gives us the following tally for Suwannee County:

Bush original: 11153 Extrapolation of Bush 100% hand count: 10549

Kerry original: 4522 Extrapolation of Kerry 100% hand count: 5126

Net change: Kerry +1208

In the original count, 71.2% of the votes cast for Bush or Kerry (n=15675) went to Bush. In the hand count, this drops to 67.3%. That

is a significant drop. Let's translate that into numbers. If you take the percentages from the hand count and extrapolate, here's

what you get:

Bush = 15675 x .673 = 10549 (loss of 604)

Kerry = 15675 x .327 = 5126 (gain of 604)

Net change: Kerry +1208

A switch of 1208 votes in a county with less than 16K votes cast is obviously huge. Now maybe there's a very large percentage of Bush votes in that remaining 40% that they didn't count, but we can't know that because they didn't count them. Which begs the question...why did they stop counting in Suwannee County when their tabulation of 60% of the ballots deviated so much from the original total? And without actually counting those remaining ballots, how can they possibly report that nothing is amiss when the data they have so far suggests a possible problem?

What I see is a possible gain of 1243 votes for Kerry from three small counties in which only 23627 ballots were cast. That

represents about 0.3% of the ballots cast for Bush and Kerry statewide. If Kerry gained votes at the same rate statewide, he picks up nearly 400,000 votes and wins Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berniew1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Miami Herald didn't even understand consequenses of their own study
But the big studies of Florida vote counts found the major problems in the big touchscreen counties.

Major vote irregularties in big touchscreen Florida counties

Univ. of Calif. study www.computerworld.com/governmenttopics/government/policy/story/0,10801,97614,00.html

FLCV study www.flcv.com/fla04EAS.html ... www.flcv.com/fla04EA.html

www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0411/S00072.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepper32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Do you really have to ask? Even Randi Rhodes is being silenced. Damn
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Depends on who I'm demanding an answer from.
Please see post #5.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepper32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Look, my post wasn't meant as sarcasm, hope you didn't take it that way.
I'm just frustrated because we really don't have a voice.

I was just thinking out loud. Kinda like what you were doing with the main post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Not taken that way at all!
I should've been clearer in the first place.

Cheers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepper32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. No problem...
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malatesta1137 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
20. really? how do you know?
I haven't listened to her since the elections much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Calvinist Basset Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. "Despite claims of fraud and technical glitches . . ."
I'm still ticked at Kerry for conceding. Random technical glitches *might* be excusable--but how can anyone concede an election when claims of fraud are being made? Any fraud, no matter how small, should nullify the whole damn thing.

Still, I hope the election is turned over and Kerry is inaugurated.

In the meantime, we should be jamming the phone lines of the TV networks, radio stations, newspapers, etc. and tell them to report on these things. As well, we should be posting the link to this story on blogs, in mass mailings, posters, windshield fliers, notes in menus, etc.

I won't rest until we get Chimpy the sock puppet out of the Oval Office!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shakerbaker Donating Member (157 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. KIND 5 reporting
Edited on Thu Dec-02-04 09:39 PM by shakerbaker
@ 1835pst that the Washington Democratic Party currently has $650,000 so far for a recount.

Keep up with those donations.Only $100,000 to go!

oops..I posted this in the wrong thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dzika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. At first I thought it was just laziness
But now I'm getting that artificial feeling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
15. I am sorry too and I don't get why there isn't a Ukraine type
outcry going on!I am orginally from Europe and feel that Americans ought to be ashamed of themselves. But as Randi says as long as there is beer and steak on the barbecue no one really cares that people are dying!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
16. I thought this lawsuit
Edited on Thu Dec-02-04 10:21 PM by Patsy Stone
probably won't be filed until tomorrow or Monday? Was that what I heard on KO?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Flaming Red Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
17.  The media hates U.S. Those of U.S. paying attention that is. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
18. The lawyer, Cliff Arnebeck, was a guest on Washington Journal today.
Edited on Thu Dec-02-04 10:26 PM by cat_girl25
You guys should watch the video, he's in the first segment. He was cool, calm and collected and tells it like it is. He remained that way even with the repukey stupid callers.

http://www.c-span.org/homepage.asp?Cat=Series&Code=WJE&ShowVidNum=6&Rot_Cat_CD=WJ&Rot_HT=206&Rot_WD=&ShowVidDays=15&ShowVidDesc=&ArchiveDays=30

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenus Sister Donating Member (354 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. That national guardsman was scary!
I just watched that Cliff Arnebeck interview and couldn't believe what that National Guardsman (assuming he really was one) was saying. "I'm not going to sit back and let this happen!" as if...well...um...what are you going to do about it scumbag? You gonna go shoot some libruls bud? And that woman who was "outraged" at the recount efforts, fuck right the hell off.

These Puckicans just can't stand democracy in action. They're sick in the head and soul.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC