Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What do you think we should tell the National media right now re: Fraud?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
tommcintyre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 10:04 PM
Original message
What do you think we should tell the National media right now re: Fraud?
Edited on Sun Dec-05-04 10:27 PM by tommcintyre
I'm retooling the National media blaster for Tuesday, so we can blast (urge) 'em about covering the Conyers hearing, and anything else you think they should be giving adequate coverage.

Please submit your complete letters here: I don't have time to write 'em, since I will be retooling the mechanics of it to be even more powerful and effective.

Thanks

See previous subject headlines here:
http://www.independentmediasource.com/voteintegrity.htm

See previous letter samples here:
http://www.independentmediasource.com/voteintegrity2_12.htm

Also, needed: letters to "friends" encouraging them to use the blaster to email the national media to.
http://www.independentmediasource.com/voteintegrity_emailothers.htm

The more letters (subject lines) the better. (It gives people more choice, and looks better in the "inbox" of the media.)





With this new program, you are able to email 392 national media contacts with just four clicks of your email send button!

In addition, there is a "Tell Everyone You Know" page that will enable you to quickly email all your personal contacts


<I will update it, so someone has the option to email the "top 100" National Media contacts with just one click of the send button. That's why I need help with this, since my updating will be very time-consuming.>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tommcintyre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. 1 - SUBJECT HEADLINES HERE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tommcintyre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. 2 - LETTERS TO NATIONAL MEDIA HERE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lwesty Donating Member (114 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. here is a letter I sent earlier

Thank you for reporting on what may be more election fraud. With all the allegations about possible fraud on the part of Republicans before and after the election and very little media coverage, it is refreshing to see this is finally becoming an issue and getting appropriate attention. Allegations against the Republican Party are widespread and numerous:
http://www.toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20041013/NEWS03/410130378
http://www.klas-tv.com/Global/story.asp?S=2421595&nav=168XRvNe
https://voteprotect.org/index.php?display=EIRMapNation
http://www.house.gov/judiciary_democrats/ohblackwellltr12204.pdf
I was wondering when the Republican party would start to make their own claims of fraud. It is, after all, an obvious and expected ploy against the Democrats to deflect attention from themselves.
However, in the interest of fair elections, if there are viable claims of fraud on both sides of the aisle, we should cast out the election results of Nov. 2, 2004 and have a re-vote. Preferably one with a verifiable accounting of the ballots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lwesty Donating Member (114 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. and from last week :)
For the love of Democracy…
Let the recount begin!!!
Just as this election should not have been about party politics neither should be the verification of our vote.
Republicans would be up in arms if there were even a hint of impropriety in the vote if the Democrats won the election. The media silence on possible fraud in the 2004 election is disturbing. I should think that every American whether blue, red or purple, would want absolute transparency and verifiability in our voting systems. After the 2000 vote debacle, the 2004 vote fraud question is even more feasible. The more often we turn a blind eye, the more often we will be duped. Please help concerned citizens like myself have a voice in our democracy. Let’s dig out the truth, no matter what it is.
However, if the suspicions prove true, better to know now while there is still time to stop the hijacking of our democracy and our country. My “moral values” include a desire, no, a demand for the truth. How about yours?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tommcintyre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. 3 - LETTERS URGING "FRIENDS" TO BLAST THE NAT. MEDIA HERE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. It doesn't matter what we tell them.
They will not listen. The Bush Reich won't let them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. we are both no going O/T
but between what you just posted, and what's in your sig, are you a bit confused???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I'm not saying don't do it.
Edited on Sun Dec-05-04 10:15 PM by ocelot
I've just become pretty cynical about the mainstream media. Even considering all that's happened already, nobody will talk about it except Olbermann. So I wonder what, if anything, it will take to get their attention -- or, more accurately, overcome their reluctance to cover anything that might be displeasing to the Reich, which sees to it that their bread is generously buttered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tommcintyre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. HOW ABOUT 10,000 OR MORE EMAILS "IN THEIR FACE!"
"So I wonder what, if anything, it will take to get their attention."

YA THINK THAT WOULD GET THEIR ATTENTION?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. yes it would
as far as alliance and loyalty goes, money talks. If they think they have pissed off enough people, it will make them at least consider or they lose viewers/readers which means they lose ad money.

Do not forget your daily voting: vote with your dollar and let the companies know you do so. If a company does something you disagree with, it is not good enough to stop buying their service, but to let them know why. If they get enough such letters (emails/calls/etc) they will listen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tommcintyre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. You are sooo right! The Sinclair media blast cost 'em $10 MILLION!
Edited on Mon Dec-06-04 03:19 AM by tommcintyre
From my homepage:
http://www.independentmediasource.com/index.html

This program is based on the highly successful "Stop Sinclair" email program. If you recall, Sinclair broadcasting was going to show the anti-Kerry smear "documentary" on its 25 stations. The end result was that this email campaign (along with other efforts) was able to not only stop the films showing on its scheduled date, but it also caused the Sinclair stock to plummet 17%. And, according to the website, it cost Sinclair $10 million dollars!

Plain and simple, media email campaigns work! Keith Olbermann, who is, in effect, the only national media to give the potential presidential election vote fraud issue both fair and adequate coverage, constantly asks us to "Keep those email coming at KOlbermann@msnbc.com" And, shortly, after the election, I heard Peter Jennings complained on-air, that they were doing the (lousy) story, just to stop so many emails from coming. The media knows that the emails they get are only "the tip of the iceberg". For everyone they get, there may be 1,000 people that don't write, but feel the same way!

Com' on!... Talk is cheap! Write some letters for the Conyers hearing!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neversaynever Donating Member (188 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Emails don't cut the mustard anymore: HARDCOPY
I wonder what would happen if say only 100 people decided to EACH print out ALL the documents listed at this great overview site--may as well throw in "today's news" and add it to the top of the pile. (I haven't printed the whole URL yet, but I suspect it's well over 1,000 pages).

http://shadowbox.i8.com/

What then if those 100 people EACH sent full hardcopies of this URL to the 3 major papers (say NYT, WashPost, LAtimes)?

What if they *insured* their packages, which means someone in those offices would have to *sign for them? What if they did this all on the same day?

What if more than 100 people did that?

(emails are very easily ignored these days--a paper trail 100 X 1,000 pages long is *not so easily ignored).

Just a thought.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #16
26. Yes!Trucks full of boxes w.hard copies delivered en masse!
Have one set of printed voting fraud documentation delivered to each station under the name of every DU member willing to sign on and pay shipping costs. Forum operators here should e-mail everyone to ask if they'd be willing to chip in some. Imagine 50,000 stacks of this stuff being delivered to CNN! We'd need someone to coordinate it in NYC, where the networks are located.

Have a delivery service bring them all at the same time. Notify other media of this fabulous photo opportunity. Just picture if the independent newspapers ran photos of delivery vans delivering stack of boxes full of proof that our election was rigged. Have A DU rep there to "deliver" the goods in person, announcing to passerbys with a bullhorn what's up, while protesters carrying signs march in the streets outside to further enhance this media opportunity.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
32. Hi neversaynever!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neversaynever Donating Member (188 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. Hey Newyawker....
Been lurkin' for awhile...you think the hardcopy idea is worth it? How would we coordinate it?

I was thinking more just to the print media (3 biggies)....but it does seem that emails are just too easy to ignore.

It's about "paper trail" aint it? :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
25. DEMOCRATS OWN MEDIA STOCK, TOO.
We should all buy stock, show up in mass to the next stockholders' meeting and raise hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pointsoflight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. I personally think that we should hit the voter suppression issue hard...
...and how the suppression may have violated the constitutional rights of minority voters in urban areas.

In particular, I think it's important to point out that the many problems in Ohio were much, much more prevalent in precincts with high percentages of Black voters.

The graphs here show this very effectively:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/12/5/94939/4521
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tommcintyre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
11. Anybody ready to write a simple letter to save our country? n/t
Edited on Mon Dec-06-04 07:55 AM by tommcintyre
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neversaynever Donating Member (188 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Media Letter
Despite the fact that it's "dated", this one still seems pertinent and to the point to me:

An Open Letter to the NYT (and by Implication) the Rest of the US Media Who Are Trying to Whitewash the Election Scandal
http://www.opednews.com/friedberg_111504_media_whitewash.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beammeup Donating Member (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
12. Cancel your subscription!
I just cancelled my subscription to the Boston Globe, which is owned by the same company as the NY Times. Here's what I sent the circulation department:


What has happened to the Globe? The disgraceful and misleading articles casually dismissing the evidence of voter fraud were deplorable, but the last straw was the article about the local man who was killed in Iraq. The headline, "Marine fell trying to right the wrongs of Sept. 11", could have been written by Dick Cheney. Was it?

If I want right-wing nonsense I can read the Wall Street Journal's editorial page. Please cancel my subscription and send me a final bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
33. Hi beammeup!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lthuedk Donating Member (551 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
13. Revote or Revolt.
No compromise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #13
24. REVOTE WITHOUT MACHINES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tommcintyre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
14. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cry baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
17. Done!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cry baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
18. Kick for democracy! USE YOUR VOICES - It's easy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tommcintyre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
19. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannahcares Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
22. tell national media to cover new Election Protection Report
The Election Protection Corps released their massive study of Electoral Problems on Monday. The document, titled "Shattering the Myth - an Initial Snapshot of Voter Disenfranchisement in the 2004 Election" should be reviewed and publicized in every major newspaper and on cable and network television. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A41275-2004Dec6.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannahcares Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. text of PFAW press release on Voter Disenfranchisement in 2004 Election
(also posted on another thread... newbie here...)

For Immediate Release: 12/6/2004
Contact: Priscilla Ring or Laurie Boeder PFAW Foundation
email: media@pfaw.org
phone: 202.467.4999


Dispenses the Myth of “Smooth” 2004 Elections:
Shattering The Rose-Colored Glasses


Lead Groups in Election Protection’s Massive Voting Rights Mobilization Release Post-Election Review Documenting Barriers to Ballot, Systemic Inequities and Irregularities

The myth that the 2004 elections ran smoothly has become conventional wisdom for pundits and politicians, but nothing could be further from the truth. A preliminary review released today by members of the nonpartisan Election Protection coalition demonstrates that persistent problems continue to deny millions of Americans their fundamental voting rights, and makes the case for election reform at the local, state and national level.

Election Protection fielded more than 25,000 volunteers, including more than 8,000 lawyers, who monitored the polls at more than 3,500 precincts nationwide and answered the nationwide Election Protection Hotline. The program targeted heavily African-American, Latino and low-income precincts, and fielded hundreds of thousands of voter questions and complaints. The program database already includes more than 39,000 records of voter problems. Election Protection also engaged in pre-election advocacy, battling decisions by local election officials that raised barriers to the ballot box.

“The idea that the election ran smoothly, the idea that the problems we saw in 2000 did not recur in 2004, is simply a crock. Too many people faced too many barriers to the ballot box, from impossibly long lines to outright voter intimidation and misinformation. It’s time to shatter the myth and work toward an election system that is more fair and more reliable for every American,” said Ralph G. Neas, President, People For the American Way Foundation.

The preliminary review, “Shattering the Myth: An Initial Snapshot of Voter Disenfranchisement in the 2004 Elections” surfaces a myriad of systemic problems. In addition to the long lines and unreasonable waiting times that kept many people - disproportionately urban minority voters - from being able to vote, the top five problems overall were registration processing, absentee ballots, machine errors, voter intimidation and suppression, and problems with the use and counting of the new provisional ballots mandated under new federal law.

Election Protection also fought pre-election decisions by local election officials that tended to disenfranchise voters, including Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell’s ludicrous demand that voter registration forms be printed on 80-pound card stock instead of common printer paper, or Florida Secretary of State Glenda Hood’s attempts to implement a “felon purge” list that state officials knew was flawed. Those decisions were both eventually abandoned.

“The bright light of public scrutiny, intense pressure from the media and action in the courts helped us stop some of the most egregious actions, but nevertheless, too many voters were either disenfranchised or discouraged by the decisions of public officials,” said Neas. “It’s the job of government officials to advocate for voters and to clear the path to the ballot box, not erect barriers.”

Among the most disturbing reports were the more than a thousand reports of voter suppression or intimidation at the polls, including:
Police stationed outside a Cook County, Illinois polling place requesting photo ID and telling voters if they had been convicted of a felony that they could not vote.


In Arizona voters at multiple polls were confronted by an individual wearing a black tee shirt with “US Constitution Enforcer” and a military-style belt that gave the appearance he was armed. He asked voters if they were citizens, accompanied by a cameraman who filmed the encounters.


Numerous incidents of intimidation by partisan challengers at predominately low-income and minority precincts


Misinformation campaigns delivered through anonymous flyers or phone calls with a variety of intimidating or vote-suppressing messages, advising voters to go to the polls on November 3rd rather than November 2, or giving other false information on voting rights. A few of the most outrageous examples include:
"If you already voted in any election this year, you can’t vote in the Presidential Election."


"If anybody in your family has ever been found guilty of anything you can’t vote in the Presidential Election."


"If you violate any of these laws, you can get 10 years in prison and your children will be taken away from you."

While workers are still entering voter complaints into the Election Incident Reporting System, the 39,000 reports already entered include a wide range of problems surrounding voter registration, absentee ballots, voting machines, and provisional ballots.

“Since we targeted 3,500 vulnerable precincts, we saw only the tip of the iceberg. We found human error, equipment problems, bureaucratic snafus and outright attempts to deceive and misinform the voters everywhere. Extrapolate our findings to the rest of the country, and you see a picture of a flawed election system, badly in need of reform,” said Neas.

The groups will continue to analyze the data, and have also set a preliminary agenda for election reform. Early recommendations include:
Support for uniform and non-discriminatory standards for counting provisional ballots


Improved poll worker training


Better enforcement of anti-voter-intimidation laws


More efficient and accountable processing of voter registration applications


Full funding for the Help America Vote Act (HAVA)


Increased support for voter education campaigns


Immediate development of the technical guidelines for voting systems by the Election Assistance Commission (EAC)


Support for required voter verified audit trails for all voting systems


Public hearings by Congress, the EAC and possibly the Federal Election Commission


Support for a report to be undertaken by the General Accounting Office on voting irregularities throughout the country




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #22
34. Hi Hannahcares!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tommcintyre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
27. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Buzzflash
Why did Buzzflash remove the Clinton Curtis article completely. It was there last night, now there is no trace of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. buzz
alright, I guess I just needed more coffe. Haven't been sleeping well lately - it is moved way down the front page. Never mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamoth Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
30. Tell them to look at this:
http://www.copperas.com/machinery/

And to remember that our issue is a bipartisan one that trancends party politics, but goes to the heart of our very freedom.

Here's my letter:

-------------------------
This is NON-partisan. Proof of fraud by both Democrats and Republicans is my objective. I want to expose it ALL, and include all Americans in a cry for fair democracy. This is something that concerns everyone in this country, and for that matter, the world. There can be no equivocation of the issue...this is a simple matter and to oppose it is indefensible. This scandal was the last straw for me, and a warning call to all who love freedom.

I seek to promote this fact and increase support among the people by appealing to their patriotism, faculties of reason, and outrage. Certainly, if nothing else, there is AMPLE evidence to support the fact that our election system is far from ideal. There is plenty of room for doubt, and little room for comfort in that 20% of Americans polled feel the election is fraudulent to some degree. Calls of fraud have been issued form both the left and the right, from all four political parties who participated in my state...it has pervaded the American consciousness, and overwhelmed our sense of greater morality.

So many people, so stimulated, have reduced their participation in American politics as a direct response to the uncertainty in our electoral process. The media seeks to avoid another Florida debacle, by not reporting on what amounts to another Florida debacle. No matter your outlook, it is clear that these are danger signs for democracy. When the will of the people is uncertain, and our votes unsure, we are forced to evaluate those mechanisms, which have lead us to the precipice of a constitutional crisis that continues to exist whether it is reported or not.

With hundreds of valid and appealing ideas being issued to the American people for reforming our elections, we have nothing more than a price tag to stand in our way. Knowing that we spend 300 billion + to bring freedom to the middle east where it scarcely seems to be at hand, and knowing our nations commitment to providing freedom to all who seek it out, at what price shall our freedom be deemed unworthy? There is no limit to how far we should go to secure our sacred right to vote. There is no limit to the questions we should rightly ask. There is no danger in examination, and skepticism, where none argue that there exist many who would seek to undermine America's fantastic dream. I am committed to exploring the problems in this and all future elections. I am committed to instituting reforms in our voting process, and determining the facts of the election as quickly as possible, hoping that America can know its voice and heal in earnest. What, I wonder, are those who oppose these actions committed to?
--------------------------------
The long version...

Democracy is important to you, obviously. The foundation of democracy is our right to vote...Behind every uncounted vote a person who now lives under a dictatorship. We use terms like spoilage and over votes, but for each one of those thousands upon thousands of ballots that are so cast away...There is a human being, just like you or me, who does not live in America...They may live in our borders...but without our votes, we are not free Americans.

Freedom is so important that we have waged a war in foreign lands to grant it to it's people. Freedom is so important that we willingly send ourselves, and our progeny, to die defending it. What price is too high for freedom? Where does freedom sit in our national leader’s priorities? What party or person can make a legitimate claim to own all rights to freedom’s share? It is for all of us...each and every one...What American among us could actually say that in order to be a more perfect union, and count every vote, there is a price too high, a day too long, a job more important?

I am DEEPLY concerned by the callous attitude of many in the political circles in BOTH parties. Kerry takes the brunt of my fury. As a leader in our party, it was his solemn duty to defend our party’s votes. But as President and leader of the majority party, Bush also is required to protect each and every single vote of all citizens. I cannot look either person in the eye. They both have made trivia of the very fabric of our flag, the blood of our slain heroes, and every grain of American soil that makes this nation one.

I appeal to your patriotism and your moral voice. Can you see that this is NOT a partisan issue? This transcends Bush Vs. Kerry, and goes to the heart of democracy itself. There is an overwhelming body of facts supporting the notion that the election was tampered with on some level or another. By what possible moral right can any of us pretend that this is a trifling thing? This is a clear and bleeding wound that goes to the heart of our nation's principles and values. Yet it is framed as a partisan debate having something to do with two opposing figureheads who in the long term mean very little compared to our nations noble history of representative government.

I appeal to your indignation, and your passions when I ask you what price is too high? What priority before this is higher? What on earth could possibly stop the American people, so motivated by the defense of all that is shared as decent and true in our collective senses of justice, from pursuing with all possible haste, the clear intent and determination of every voter? Should it cost 200 billion dollars, the price would be small compared to the countless patriots who have died for our sacred civil right of representation. Should it cost double that, would the soldiers then return to their graves, satisfied that freedom cost too much money after all? How can anyone talk about health care or social security, when millions of Americans across the country can not determine what sort of government it is that we now have?

Perfect transparencies of election procedures, that yet defend our valued rights to secret ballot, are easy to assemble and propose. I have many such plans at my disposal to offer for evaluation. IT cannot be argues that at least a few thousand votes were thrown away. Spoilage and chads, electronic voting machines with complexities so convoluted that most of the electorate could not make an informed decision as to whether they functioned or not! Should our voting standards hinge upon technology that we must rely on arguing experts to trust? Why is such complicated machinery required? Is it not as important to you, as it is to all of us, to define a new election standard to replace those now standing, which are clearly flawed and prone to tampering? Should we not recognize the republican Dino Rossi who has claimed that democrats were fraudulently marking ballots in Washington? We owe more to America, we owe more to our neighbors, and particularly, we owe it to each other. Please stand with us, and help America reform it's election procedures. Evaluate from our perspective, and behold that no matter your party, no matter your outlook, there are those in power who are actively working to prevent the accurate conduct of elections. Shall we the people of the United States of America actually stand by an proclaim this politics as usual?

Share your indignation with us. Lend your voice to ours and stand up for what we all know is right. The right to vote is universal to citizens in good standing and all men and women of good character and sound reasoning must protect this. The sides in this argument are not the forces of Democrats Vs. The forces of the Republicans, as there are members of both groups on each side of this issue. What we now see emerging is a battle between to voice of the people and interests of corrupt politicians for whom the right to vote is merely another political tool.
---------------------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fly by night Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Calling the Ukrainian kettle "flawed" -- our own stolen election
Since a few others have posted their recent letters, I am posting a letter I submitted last night to the Nashville Tennessean and (slightly edited) to the Washington Post. I think any effort we make to increase the MSM coverage of the election theft at this moment should begin with the assumption that most MSM readers will have only minimal and passing knowledge of what we know. But if your local paper/TV station gives you any foot in the door (say, by mentioning the Conyers et al hearing today in their coverage), then like all good Salepeople for Democracy, we need to pounce.

You will note that I made no mention of the Curtis revelations in my letter. However, I did reference Curtis in the intro to my letter, and had already sent a link to the Bradblog article to the letters editor (who has published my submissions before) to loosen her up for my letter. So here's what this very frustrated backwoods "yellow dog" had to say to middle Tennessee's paper of record last night:
-----

To the editor:

Thanks for your 11/30 editorial cartoon which showed Bush speaking with Putin about election fraud reports. When Bush says, "I'm a little disturbed about Ukraine", Putin responds "I'm a little disturbed about Ohio." Given how much election fraud evidence has now been uncovered in our country, Putin could have added "... and Florida, New Mexico, Wyoming, Nevada, Washington, Iowa ... (etc, etc, ad nauseum)."

Since 11/2, the nonpartisan Election Incident Monitoring System has logged over 37,000 (and counting) reports of election irregularities and voting machine "glitches", 99.99% of which favored Bush. Numerous voters have reported that the electronic votes they cast for Kerry registered instead for Bush or another candidate. The total votes reported cast for President in many U.S. counties exceeded the total number of people who voted. (In Wyoming, with no important state races at stake, the total reported vote for President was 106% of the total registered voters there.)

In too many states, absentee ballots were misplaced or never counted, and provisional ballots were discarded in violation of election rules. Voting machines were disproportionately distributed to create long lines in Democratic districts. And the disconnect between the exit polls and the "reported" vote – a prime source of speculation that the Ukrainian vote had been tampered with – was so bad in our own country that statisticians have placed the odds that this disconnect occurred by chance in the billions (or even trillions) to one. Compared with those odds, a PowerBall ticket would seem a safe investment.

In the face of this overwhelming evidence of U.S. election fraud, our leaders' concerned comments about the Ukrainian election seem misdirected and distractingly self-serving. I sincerely hope that the American people will become aware and resolute enough to re-import a love of democracy -- and an understanding of the necessity of free and fair elections as democracy's foundation -- from the Ukrainian people, whose brave actions have placed a spotlight on our own inattention to the obvious election theft in our country.

And while we're at it, I hope that we can also re-import from the Ukrainians the wisdom and the courage to change the things that now threaten democracy in the United States, while we still can.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Hi Fly by night!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
37. Here's what I just sent, for what it's worth
Edited on Tue Dec-07-04 10:45 PM by snot
Gentlemen and Ladies:

Until recently, you have been are among a select few media outlets I’ve trusted most. I therefore find myself not just disappointed, but deeply saddened that you, who I respect and admire so very much, have done so little to bring attention to the pervasive irregularities that occurred in the 2004 elections.

It is not impossible that justice be done. But each day that passes while you allow this matter to remain under the rug makes achieving justice more difficult.

I urge you to attend and report on the hearing to be held by Representative John Conyers, Jr., ranking Minority member of the House Judiciary Committee, on Wednesday , December 8, 2004 to investigate allegations of vote fraud and irregularities in Ohio during the 2004 Presidential election. The hearing is slated to begin at 10:00 a.m. EST in the Rayburn House Office Building in Washington DC. You can find more information about the hearing here: http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/120404W.shtml

When you are at those hearings, please bear in mind and, should you have the opportunity, please ask the following questions:

FACT
Republicans in Congress pushed the Help America Vote Act through but defeated all efforts to require auditable paper trails. Why?

FACT
In 2004, 80% of all votes in the U.S. tallied on paperless machines. Recommendations by computer experts that system software should be open-source, among other things, were ignored. Election tabulations were controlled by highly partisan, private corporations. Why?

FACT
In other developed countries, fully-papered, easily-audited voting technologies are used, and any candidate can obtain a recount for FREE—but not in the U.S. Why?

FACT
Kerry led big in all exit polls, but then he lost. Why?

FACT
Thousands of incidents: disenfranchised, touchscreen votes that switch themselves to Bush, terror alert lockouts, paucity of voting machines in Democratic precincts, spoiled ballots (again). Why?

FACT
The vast majority of glitches and incidents favored Bush. Why?

FACT
Professors’ and researchers’ statistical analyses point overwhelmingly to fraud, as there is a one-way shift from the exit polls to Bush. Why?

FACT
Exit polls are used to check for election fraud all over the world--but here they have merely been disparaged--even though, ahead of the election, we were told they’d been overhauled to be more accurate than ever before. Why?

FACT
Exit pollsters have refused to release their raw data, saying it belongs to their news organization clients. Those organizations could surely request that that data be released, but have not (see below). Why?

FACT
Ohio is failing to enforce its own laws regarding the retention of voting documentation. Why?

Finally, how much fraud is enough fraud for the results of an election to be thrown out? Or have we actually reached the sad point of believing that, if the fraud’s BIG enough, it may be too big to be overturned?

Mitofsky International has responded to Representative Conyers’ request for the raw exit poll data by stating that the information belongs to Mitofsky’s new organization clients; see http://www.house.gov/judiciary_democrats/mitofskyelecinforesp12704-1.pdf. If your organization is among Mitofsky’s clients, I urge you to immediately and publicly waive any and all confidentiality, proprietary or other rights your organization may have in such data and to request that Mitofsky release all such data to the public immediately.

I do NOT believe it is too late for for us to discover the truth about what must surely be one of the most important stories in U.S. history and for a REAL resolution to be achieved. Please help.

Thank you.

{And thanks to TruthIsAll for most of the questions above.}
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Razorback_Democrat Donating Member (756 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
38. They should cover the Conyers hearings
and do background on why Katherine Blackwell isn't showing up

Why Mitofsky refuses to release the data

why there are so many complaints of election "irregularities"

background on Arnebank? (sp)in Ohio

the Ohio recount by GLibs

lack of media coverage, why?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC