Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New York Times

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
dogindia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 07:31 AM
Original message
New York Times
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
indy_azcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. As Questions Keep Coming, Ohio Certifies Its Vote Count
For those w/o registrations:

<SNIP>
WASHINGTON, Dec. 6 - The Ohio secretary of state officially certified on Monday that President Bush won that swing state by roughly 119,000 votes, but an array of Democrats, third-party candidates and independent groups continued to question the results, issuing new demands for a statewide recount and a formal investigation of the vote.

Even before Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell, a Republican, issued the final tally, the Democratic National Committee said it would appoint an expert panel to review voting problems in Ohio - including long lines, voting machine errors and understaffed polling stations - that it said had disenfranchised voters in predominantly Democratic urban districts.

Democratic officials, walking a fine line between their angry liberal base and centrist voters who consider the election over, said they were not contesting the results. But they said they planned to use the results of their investigation, which is to be completed by the summer, to demand changes to the electoral systems in Ohio and other states.

<SNIP>

Summer?


<SNIP>
The final vote count showed that the margin had shrunk to 118,775 votes, or 2 percent of the total, after absentee and provisional ballots were tabulated and some Election Day counting errors were corrected, according to the certified results released by Mr. Blackwell on Monday
<SNIP>

Under Ohio law, the recount must begin within 10 days of the formal request and groups calling for a recount have to pay for part of the cost.

Ohio's presidential electors are scheduled to meet next Monday to cast their votes for Mr. Bush, though it is virtually certain that the challenges and recounts will not be completed by then.

<End Snippage>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I wonder if anyone is going to try to get a court order
to stop Ohio's electors from meeting on Monday? Under the circumstances and especially considering Blackwell's actions and conflicts of interest, maybe it's time to get the courts to intervene?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truehawk Donating Member (797 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Controversies have to be settled before the electors can be chosen
However unless someone gets off their ass and says that the result of the election may change, there is NO Controversy and time is NOT of the essence. Recounts in Ohio have taken 6 weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bones_7672 Donating Member (558 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Doesn't the article also say they'll be done in the spring
with the investigation? Seems like they have no plans on stopping the electors or inaugaration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. If we hadn't raised a fuss
would the DNC have done ANYTHING? They did a weak-kneed study last time about widespread discrepancies and fraud and then proceed to weakly let the GOP game phony baloney "reform".

Is our party full of GOP infiltrators on the top or what? That is one investigation I would like to see, not this Johny come lately going through the motions- with apologies and bowing to King Fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good morning, and welcome to DU, dogindia.
Thanks for the heads-up on The Times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogindia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. TY. notice no mention of Conyers hearing
Guess they can only do so much. I sent all the nyt news people the letter and follow up letters. The lack of MSM coverage is outrageous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clutchcargo Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. caps lock
Sorry about the caps lock thing--It drives my kids nuts also---I am not sure i get the guarding bridges thing --But then I am probably a little slow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clutchcargo Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. FALSE HOPE
I SO MUCH WISH THAT WE COULD SOMEHOW CHANGE WHAT HAS HAPPENED BUT WITH THIS VOTE CERTIFIED AND OUR OWN NATIONAL PARTY SAYING THE ELECTION IS OVER I JUST THINK THIS IS FALSE HOPE MY WIFE HAS READ SOME OF MINE AND OTHERS POST AND THINKS THAT THIS IS THERAPY FOR US --SORT OF LIKE MICHAEL MOORE STAYING IN BED FOR THREE DAYS AFTER THE ELECTION ----I FEEL I SHOULD BE WEARING BLACK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. You don't have to shout
Please turn off the caps lock. Thanks.

BTW: Welcome to DU :hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. I feel you should be guarding bridges.
Bye bye...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Say hello to Spinner and Paddlefoot on your way out

Bye, now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tngledwebb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
12. Good old nyt lib bias in action.
Burying a top story, then spinning it into oblivion. But it's not going away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
14. It is good that it has hit the NYT...
This is a huge improvement over the first article in the NYT - "Conspiracy theories inspired by blogs are quickly buried" - that one ticked me off BIG time.

I am relieved to hear that Blackwell certified yesterday and I am ANXIOUS for Arnebeck to get to court -- I am pretty sure he is taking the Kerry/Connally discrepancy argument with him <http://www.freepress.org/departments/display/19/2004/944> and according to one article I read he will present the case to one member of the Ohio Supreme Court who will rule. If needed he can appeal to the entire Ohio Supreme Court.

I can wait as long as is necessary - more interested in a just resolution than in a quick one - nonetheless this kinda hurts.

:hurts:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC