Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NY Times/ Intl. Herald Tribune Article- Long, detailed and not bad!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
KaryninMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 02:29 PM
Original message
NY Times/ Intl. Herald Tribune Article- Long, detailed and not bad!
This is not a bad piece actually- very long, lots of info and it seems to be making it's way around many different news sources. No mention of conspiracy or theory anywhere AND it says the F word-- without being patronizing!

"Notice the wording in the 2nd paragraph- "Even before Secretary of State Blackwell, A Republican, issued the final tally on Monday"...

The fact that the writer found it important to remind people that Blackwell is a Repug is I believe, an important (yet subtle) message...

Progress? Let's hope... pray...


http://www.iht.com/articles/2004/12/07/news/ohio.html

Ohio certifies 119,000-vote Bush margin, but fight goes on
By James Dao and Albert Salvato The New York Times

WASHINGTON The Ohio secretary of state has officially certified that President George W. Bush won that crucial swing state by 119,000 votes, but an array of Democrats, third-party candidates and independent groups are continuing to question the results, issuing new demands for a statewide recount and a formal investigation of the vote.

Even before Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell, a Republican, issued the final tally on Monday, the Democratic National Committee said it would appoint an expert panel to review voting problems in Ohio - including long lines, voting machine errors and understaffed polling stations - that they said had disenfranchised voters in predominantly Democratic urban districts.

snip

"Like Florida in 2000, which gave us a lot of information and evidence that we used later on to improve our election system, Ohio will play that role for us this year," said Donna Brazile, chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee's Voting Rights Institute. "There's no question that there's been a long pattern, a chilling pattern, of voter intimidation, voter suppression across the country over the years."

Snip
.
And on Wednesday, lawyers from the Alliance for Democracy, a nonprofit group, plan to ask the Ohio Supreme Court to throw out the election results and declare Kerry the winner. Officials with the group, which is filing the request on behalf of 25 Ohio voters, contended they would be able to demonstrate widespread irregularities and fraud in the heavily Republican counties surrounding Cincinnati.
.
"We will allege in the complaint that the result should have been Kerry winning," said Clifford Arnebeck, a Columbus, Ohio, lawyer who is co-chairman of the alliance.
.
Carlo LoParo, a spokesman for Blackwell, called Ohio's voting system one of the fairest in the United States because each county board of elections includes two Democrats and two Republicans. "People would be alleging a conspiracy of both Republicans and Democrats to commit fraud," LoParo said.

Snip

Still there is clearly a perception among many Democrats and members of third parties around the country that the Ohio election was riddled with technical problems and fraud. The anger with the results has fueled fund-raising drives by groups that contend that widespread irregularities occurred.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks! It's a good general update on Ohio.
And Arnebeck and his group are the ones to watch IMO. I don't have much faith in the dazzlingly over-the-top conspiracy theories of Madsen. Neither do Keith Olbermann or Bev Harris.

I really, really hope Arnebeck has a solid case to make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. "a conspiracy of Republicans and Democrats"
Carlo LoParo, a spokesman for Blackwell, called Ohio's voting system one of the fairest in the United States because each county board of elections includes two Democrats and two Republicans. "People would be alleging a conspiracy of both Republicans and Democrats to commit fraud," LoParo said.

Umm, Carlo, that would be Democrats like Zell Miller, ya think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Razorback_Democrat Donating Member (756 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. And with what has been brought forward as possible ways to "hack"
an election, it might have been done remotely, or even with a program that just needed to be activated to change the votes.

Blackwell is a loser.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. The NY Times actually decided to bring attention to....
a corrupt Rethug is a good sign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Related thread -- article by same authors in NYT
I haven't check to see if the articles are identical, but it's the same authors and same subject. Here's the thread:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x121361
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC