Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Let's look at classic Rove disinfo techniques

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 05:08 PM
Original message
Let's look at classic Rove disinfo techniques
Edited on Tue Dec-07-04 05:09 PM by Stephanie

Planted a bug in his own office, blamed it on his opponent.

Fed stories to Hatfield about Bush's cocaine conviction, then completely discredited Hatfield. Cocaine stories were discredited in the process and never mentioned again.

Of course there has been no proven connection between Rove and the "forged" Killian docs, but it fits the pattern. Put genuine info in the hands of a vulnerable messenger, then kill the messenger. Presto, the info is disappeared in the process.

Any others?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. why the hell didnt he go to jail for that bug thing?
i never understood that

you cant just report fake crimes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. dont forget the bush debate tapes that got mailed to gore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. A classic
And I believe the advisor who received them had to recuse himself? Is that correct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mak3cats Donating Member (489 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. This was one of my first posts...
(I would have referenced the thread but the archives are currently unavailable for searching.)

Can anyone tell me what the sources were for the Republicans’ assertion that the “morals issue” was the reason for Bush’s unexpected “mandate?” It seems odd that with all the pre-election scrutinizing of voter sentiments (poll after poll after yet another poll) that this issue never came up as a priority before? (And, if I’m not mistaken, current polls show that the issue has sunk again to being a non-priority.)

That means either (a) the “morals issue” spiked as an area of concern for a large segment of the voting population on Election Day only, or (b) the story was conceived and ready to be trotted out as an explanation for the unexpected election results. (And, of course, the sheep in the mainstream media picked it up without question and ran with it, as usual.)

As (a) seems unlikely to me, let’s assume for the sake of argument that it’s (b). Look what the strategy has done for the GOP:

1) It offers a quick sop to their base, leading the group to believe that their strength is growing.

2) It demoralizes the opposition. Look at all the hand-wringing going on in the Democratic Party. “We need to focus on bridging the cultural divide.” “We need to talk values, values, values.” What better than to get the Democrats to expend energies and resources to fix a problem that’s been, if not entirely invented, certainly exaggerated?

3) It gave the ever-lazier (and ever more corporate-controlled) news media a reason not to investigate anomalous election results.

And, last but absolutely not least,

4) With all the attendant media attention on the topic (even NPR has devoted several hours this past week showcasing religious figures), it has planted the notion in the minds of a generally unquestioning public that Republicans are morally superior to Democrats. And (hence my opening statement) this makes it all that harder for the allegations of vote fraud to be accepted; would such a “moral” group actually (gasp!) CHEAT to win an election?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truehawk Donating Member (797 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Response to an exit poll that lumped Moral Values with Iraq
Go ask TruthIsAll and stand back. He has the best scoop on the exit poll thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Helga Scow Stern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. KKKarl also told the Republican Governors' klavern that they had a mandate
because of the minority vote. Now it has been shown that Latinos voted for Kerry by Latino exit poll conductors.

He tries to coordinate his lies, but arrogance always brings people down. That's usually how the smartest serial killers get caught.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. The thing about rove is that they are always remarkable simple
Act like a bug was planted, or send a paper to a guy and tell him it is authentic (without the source). Allways sooo simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. A movement swells, a sparkly bandwagon appears, "gets ahead of"
the push, momentum herded toward it until it can be spun to define the movement, then is exposed to be something so lacking in substance that the entire movement, and any amount of real evidence, is tainted beyond any future credibility.

Over and over again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. exactly
Great summary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleiku52cab Donating Member (674 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. the flawed messenger gambit seems to be KKKKarls favorite
recently. Watch his minions jump all over Curtis as a 'tin foil mad hatter' who is only trying to sell books.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zan_of_Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. weapons inspector Scott Ritter was smeared too.
Didn't find weapons in Iraq, so his personal life was immediately smeared.

And, hey, did we forget Joe Wilson -- he debunked the yellowcake uranium story, and whoa, his wife is outed as undercover CIA. By whom? Well, we're still waiting, aren't we.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. Don't forget the smears of Roger Clark.
Edited on Wed Dec-08-04 12:30 AM by merh
But if you want to have fun, go to the thread at the link below and read the complaint filed in 2002 with the FEC naming Feeney, Yang and NASA. Funny how those names come up.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x126092

(Oh yeah, Feeney's counsel before the FEC was none other than Ginsberg.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smirking_Chimp Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. exit poll snafu
How about sending out the message "when you go in that voting booth, don't let your family or friends influence how you really feel." the night before the election, and having everyone on their side saying "I don't trust the exit polling! People lie about who they vote for." giving them enough cover to defend against the voter fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truehawk Donating Member (797 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. What was the Proof the memos were "fake"?
Somehow I missed it.
I saw a jave animation that preported to show spacing and font, but did nothing of the kind.
I overlayed the two and the finals on Times Roman did not align.
There was a uneven base line, and there were a couple of different sizes of a, which puzzled me. But I have yet to find a computer font that matches, so Just what WAS the proof that the memos were fake now?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. No such proof, that I'm aware of
And everyone involved testified that whether the docs were genuine or not, they DID reflect Killian's true sentiments as he expressed them at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. And, yet, everyone thinks that
Dan Rather and his producers lied regarding the report.

The documents were phony, but the sentiments were true and backed up by real life people. But, everyone thinks the whole story was wrong. Why? Because the press hasn't clarified it.

What we need is a public relations expert just for the party.

I can be as mean and sneaky as KKKarl... and I look a lot better (and am tons more healthy). :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truehawk Donating Member (797 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Again what proof was ever offered that the docs were fake?
I looked at a bunch of font and never found anything like that "a". Their spaceing thing with the animation did not work if you tried to replicate what the guy said he had done.

Did anyone find the font? Did I photoshop it wrong, do it wrong? or we just plain out BLUFFED??

And now they are going to bluff us out of the presidency AGAIN, and our jobs, health, air, water, peice of mind, VOTE< COUNTRY, DEMOCRACY and FREEDOM. OUT BLUFFED!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dargondogon Donating Member (78 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #20
27. They were faked
Edited on Wed Dec-08-04 12:30 AM by dargondogon
I'm sorry, but as soon as I
saw them I knew they were
faked. And it really puz-
zled me why Rather didn't no-
tice, considering he'd used
both typewriters and com-
puters in his career.

The best evidence is the lack
of word breaks at the end of
lines in the memos. Evident-
ly Mr. Rather doesn't remem-
ber what we used to do when
we reached the end of our pa-
per back before computers
broke the lines for us.

Worse, these fakes were in-
tended to be discovered.
Look at this font, the
one that shows up while
you're typing in the mes-
sage window. A faker deter-
mined not to get caught
would have used a type-
writer font like this one
instead of the most com-
mon font available in word
processors and computers.

By the way, when comparing
fonts, print out the document.
Printed fonts are slightly
different than screen fonts.

Killian's typist called them
fake but accurate. That's
the perfect signature of a
Rove operation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truehawk Donating Member (797 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. And he has a lot of people so defensive that they eat their own fellows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Bone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. Could he be tied into...
The Toldeo Democratic Headquaters Break-In this year?

Hmmm..time may tell...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kk897 Donating Member (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Or maybe the Republican HQ break-in
Check this out:

Clipped from http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/26/politics/campaign/26breakin.html?pagewanted=print&position= Wednesday, October 27, 2004 10:53:01 AM:

Republicans Claim Democrats Are Behind Office Attacks
By DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK

Citing incidents of violence at Bush campaign offices around the country, Republicans are asserting Democratic partisans have deliberately tried to intimidate voters, potentially storing ammunition for future arguments about the fairness of the election.

Yesterday, the Bush campaign provided a list of more than 40 examples it said had occurred since July, including the burglary from campaign offices of several items: two laptop computers in Seattle; a banner in Thousand Oaks, Calif.; petty cash in Spokane, Wash.; as well as break-ins last Friday in both Flagstaff, Ariz., and Cincinnati.

(snip)

The Bush campaign is much more focused on the issue. It has set up a hot line to collect information about any examples of "intimidation or harassment" of Republican voters or "destruction of Bush-Cheney property."

A group of 50 Republicans in the House led by Representative Tom Feeney of Florida sent a letter on Oct. 7 to Attorney General John Ashcroft suggesting the existence of "a plan to intimidate volunteers who were supporting their candidate" and requesting an investigation.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDemGrrl Donating Member (786 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #18
34. Tom Feeney's name sure seems to be popping up on a lot of threads..
Maybe someone should start a FEENEY THREAD. This guy is looking more "interesting" by the minute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kk897 Donating Member (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
16. In "Bush's Brain"...
it says that Rove did this thing when he was a College Republican. He broke into a Dem's campaign headquarters and stole letterhead. Then he put out a release on it that invited a bunch of hippies (it was the early 70s) and homeless shelter patrons to a fundraiser (or some other important function for this candidate). When all these fringy types showed up, there was chaos.

Sure it was almost a practical joke, and he was reprimanded for it, but it brought him to the attention of Poppy Bush, and the rest is history.

(Please forgive me if the particulars are a little off... I don't have such a great memory).

The stealing letterhead thing is what made me realize that he was obviously setting Rather up on the memos thing.

I thought the upshot of that incident was that the memos CBS had in hand may or may not be genuine, but that the content of them was accurate according to all sorts of other testimony given by people who knew Bush then, commanders, etc.

It wouldn't surprise me if Madsen's famous check was a Rove move, and he was almost taken in by it, then saw through it.

So common threads: Discredit the messenger. Produce bogus documentation that looks official. The truth is put out there in a package of disinformation.

So I guess we could start looking at the people who are being discredited lately (perhaps even a criminal past revealed, a la Hatfield) and look at their stories a little more closely.

Just a thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truehawk Donating Member (797 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Please see my post up thread, if the Memos were a Rove setup
What proof was there? other than Bluff?

Nope WE let them BLUFF THEIR WAY OUT OF IT.

And we let a good man down.



Lord if someone had made 19 billion min on insider trading on tenets of a building destroyed by terrorists while the interceptor wings were stood down, during a Democratic Presidency, what would the hue and cry have been?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kk897 Donating Member (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Rove and co. don't need any kind of proof at this point, it seems
in order to be believed by the credulous Redumblicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
19. None of Rove's tricks would work without a complicit media.
With their collaboration, even his most sophomoric tricks are given a pass.
That's why he doesn't have to think of anything new.
He makes me sick, but the collaborators make me sicker.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dargondogon Donating Member (78 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #19
38. They're more timid than we can imagine
One story recently suggested that Karl Rove was on the phone Nov. 2, urging Tom Brokaw to declare W the winner. A real journalist would have put the jack ass on the air and let us all hear it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Razorback_Democrat Donating Member (756 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
21. We need to keep this thread kicked
as I believe that after tomorrow's hearings begin, the MSM will start paying attention and the Rovian media (RW) will be in full swing.

That's the other thing, he's got his own mouthpieces in Limbaugh, Hannity, and others on talk radio and on Facist News Network
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #21
29. Do you know that the weed that would be king's admin calls
those members of the media that get to fly with them or get the coverage as "earned media"? On the georgewbush.org site (satire site) can be found the dead letter files. They are emails that idiots working for the weed's campaign mistakenly sent to the satire site's catch all mail box by mistake. (instead of typing the email address as johndoe@georgewbush.com, they typed it as a .org)

One of the emails has attached to it the "earned media list" which provides the information regarding what the shrub's campaign would be doing on a given day. If you piss them off, you don't get to know what they are doing and you definitely don't get a seat on the press plane.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dargondogon Donating Member (78 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
25. Printed hateful flyer about his own guy
I think it was Sci American that profiled him before election, reported that in a small race early in his career, Rove hand delivered a hateful flyer against his own candidate on doorsteps late one night. Of course, voters blamed the oppponent for the obviously false accusations Rove printed in the flyer. Rove's candidate won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. beautiful
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #25
30. Rove doesn't stray from his M.O.
So why doesn't somebody catch him in the act?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rehema Donating Member (184 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
31. Legend of Rove as "Evil Genius" dates back to 1973
The legend of Rove as "evil genius" dates all the way back to 1973, with a Washington Post story that appeared after the Watergate break-in, reporting that Rove had taught "dirty tricks" to college Republicans. According to Bad Boy, a biography of Lee Atwater, these included sifting through opponents' garbage to gather intelligence. The RNC chairman, the elder George Bush, conducted a month-long investigation and cleared Rove, which helps to explain Rove's career-long loyalty to the family. Another story in Bad Boy—Rove acknowledges that this one is true—tells how Rove had once stolen an Illinois state treasurer candidate's letterhead and put out flyers for a party that offered "free beer, free food, girls, and a good time."

But these were mere preludes to the real stuff of Texas political legend brought up in 1991 during a state Senate confirmation hearing for (former Republican Texas Governor Bill) Clements' nomination of Rove as a regent for East Texas State University. A previous Rove nomination, during Clements' first term, as a regent for Texas Woman's University, had been rejected by the Senate on the grounds that Rove was "disruptive" and "abrasive."

To be a member of the East Texas
State University Board of
Regents for a term
to expire February 15,
1995: Martha H. Whitehead,
1908 North Fourth Street,
Longview, Texas 75601. Ms.
Whitehead will be filling
the unexpired term of
Karl C. Rove of Austin
who was rejected by the
Senate.
http://texinfo.library.unt.edu/texasregister/text/1991/0830.txt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reality_bites Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
32. Maybe Rove is a bad guy, but...
... he would have to be superman to be involved in the number of conspiracys he is charged with on DU. Honestly, when someone says "Rove" on DU, I stop listening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. hmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txindy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. Hey, Faye
Edited on Wed Dec-08-04 02:07 AM by txindy
When I'm not interested in a subject, I don't seek out the threads addressing it and post in them. A lot. Do you? Didn't think so. I wouldn't waste my time. Weird.

I think I'll go read in our favorite forum/group for a while. Clear my head. Plan a birthday greeting. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. yup, and a happy birthday to someone special
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boi1946 Donating Member (175 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:21 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. Found another one...
Rove was in Washington as leader of "College Republican" organization 1971--1973, also worked on re-election campaign for Nixon. John O'Neill, of Swift Boat Liars, was also a member of "College Republicans", and Nixon was so pleased with him after debating JK that he stayed on for awhile and also worked on campaign. They had to have known one another. And O'Neill had carried a grudge for JK for a long time. Don't know if Rove put it into motion, but sure is suspicious...





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quakerfriend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Hey, does anyone remember
the terrorist threat that appeared 2 days before the Bin Laden tape came out- just prior to the election??? Dkos had photos from the video of the guy, supposedly an American terrorist speaking in Arabic....Anyway, DKos compared the photos of the guy to KKKRove and they looked identical---right down to his glasses!! It was quickly overlooked as soon as the BIn Laden tape appeared. I swear it was Karl himself!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. i remember the video
dont' remember exactly what he looked like. i figured even at the time it was put out just to instill some fear before the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrat Dragon Donating Member (699 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
40. I heard KKKarl Rove used marketting techniques
Edited on Wed Dec-08-04 09:56 PM by Democrat Dragon
like those used by big corporations. I've seen some stuff here on DU about using demographics and other marketting strategies ofr campaigns.

BTW, where's the link to those KKKarl Rove look-alike terrorist-guy pictures?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quakerfriend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. I'll see if I can find it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
43. you nailed it
That is Rove overworked technique. Makes you wonder why the hell couldn't the Dems keep pace with this 1 trick pony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC