Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We CAN STILL WIN, and legally too

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:18 PM
Original message
We CAN STILL WIN, and legally too
One of the people asking questions at the hearing brought this up, and it's smiply brilliant.

There are 15 RED states that DO NOT legally (or otherwise) require the Electors they send to the Electoral College to vote for the candidate their state voted for. That's 155 EVs. We only need to convince 18 of them to cast their vote for Kerry and we are done. That's less than 20% and it's ONLY 18 people.

We need to get the list of these people and contact them to see if any of them do not want Bush back in office, then make sure they are aware of their rights to cast their vote they way they see appropriate.

I know one of them from WV (some mayor) has already stated he would NOT cast his vote for Bush.

What does everyone think?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bertha Venation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think those 18 people would probably fear for their lives.
JMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Vote or die? (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Of course, those 18 people
are all bigwig Republicans IIRC. Good luck with all that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes, they are picked for their extreme party loyalty.
You would probably have better luck convincing Dubya to dump Cheney, nominate Kerry as his new Veep, and then resign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Question: What are the 15 states?
Edited on Wed Dec-08-04 01:26 PM by crispini
And is there a good case to be made for rampant vote fraud in any of them?

That would help a lot.

Edit: I think it's worth trying, especially if you manage to build a convincing case. For example, show cogent examples of vote fraud in their state, or in ohio. Do a lot of research on the electors. Figure out who is more middle of the road. Pick good targets, people who have proven themselves to be sane, ethical, intelligent people.

Go for it --- build us a list, make the case elector by elector, and I bet you can get a campaign started here. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VTGold Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. He was great!! And easy on eyes too... . hubba hubba....
Seriously though - not only was that a great issue to build on.

Those electors haven't been appointed yet have they?

Maybe we could start with the House reps from Counties which went for Kerry.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. Have you ever tried to convince a bushie, it's in the koolaid-strong stuff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Actually Yes I have
I convinced a handful to withhold their vote from Bush in the election. I agree that there are many who are die-hard loyalists. But we need less than 20% to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. Here are the 15 states (and their EVs)
AZ 10
AR 6
IA 7
MO 11
VA 13
GA 15
ID 4
IN 10
KS 6
KY 8
LA 9
ND 3
SD 3
TN 11
TX 34
UT 5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. That was fast! Where'd you find them?
Here in OK, it's a crime not to vote for the "winner", although a fairly minor misdemeanor...but I'm familiar with some of them and they'd never ever cast a vote for JK even if it weren't "illegal"
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. The list of states where law/no law on EC is here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Thanks! I found another list too,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. Virginia almost went blue, if it wasn't for the shaving it probably would
have. I'll bet that's a good place to try and convince electors, also Georgia, where they stole Max Cleland's election from him in 2002. Daschle's state might have electors that feel badly that the election was stolen from a 20yr. veteran Senator, because it was. Am I up to 18 yet? Definitely the guy from WV is ripe, has he been apprised of all the fraudulent and disenfranchising shenanigi? Lots of people in Texas did not vote for Bush, and maybe electors can be convinced there. I must be up to 18 by now.

Toodles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Razorback_Democrat Donating Member (756 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
28. How can you find names?
I googled Arkansas electors and got nothing about names

any suggestions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. Man with determination like you gusy have
No wonder Kerry's gone dark.

I don't get it. Here's a perfectly good way to win and you all are whining and bitching that it would be too hard.

CMON PEOPLE! Do you really want to win or what?

This is a real shot at winning. There are plenty of republicans that are NOT happy with Bush. In fact, this is a foundation of Arnebeck's lawsuit in Ohio: that no one would suspect buffering bush's vote in heavily republican districts when in fact, there are many republicans that would vote for Kerry.

We only have to convince 18 people to do the right thing. These republicans definitely aren't getting what they voted for. Look at the mass exodus from the cabinet. Look at the continuing chaos in Iraq. Look at the continuing downward spiral of our economy and the dollar. I think many republicans may have doubts since Nov 2. Bush has certainly given them plenty of reason for doubt.

We already have one EV who is going to withhold his vote. We can also win by having 35 EVs withhold their votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
operafred Donating Member (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
27. i totally agree with you.
this is a real possibility and needs to be pursued. if we fail, we fail but if we try and fail we can never say we didn't try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Her Blondness Donating Member (156 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. Issues which could sway a moderate red elector?
Things even a republican may be pissed off about:

1. Dismissal of Colin Powell

2. But no dismissal of Rumsfeld

3. Condi Rice appointment

4. With bush as president, the gop will take big losses in congress in 2006 because of the backlash. If Kerry is president, they will probably keep both houses.

5. Imminent supreme court appointment, some republicans are actually pro-choice

6. Proposed privatization of social security

7. The evangelical conservative christian mandate. Not every republican wants a theocracy, some are only pragmatic fiscal conservatives.

8. Invasion of Iran being trial-ballooned.


9. And the fact that the country is pretty much going to hell in a handbasket, wiser heads should see that regardless of party affiliation.

I know there's more. If we are going to write letters in a attempt to persuade electors, these are some topics we might bring up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paula777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. I know for a fact Republican are really pissed off about ...
That 9/11 Intelligence reform bill that passed yesterday. They were very angry it didn't have illegal alien reforms in it and would continue to allow illegals to obtain drivers licenses. Even though the majority of them voted for it, 75 did not. Of the vast majority that did, they did so ONLY because they were promised a major overhaul of illegal immigration laws in the next session. The repukes are so pissed that it passed and the senior ones know that the promise of an overhaul is just bullshit. They feel bush strong armed them. I can't think of an angle to use this though, because all the dems voted for the reform bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ahyums Donating Member (348 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. there is no such thing as a moderate red elector
The electors are at the very core of the base in terms of support. Issues are simply not going to be sufficient to get them to change their mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Her Blondness Donating Member (156 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #19
43. There is one in WV
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gothmog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. This was tried in 2000 when we only needed one vote
An attempt was made in 2000 to get one or two GOP electors to be faithless and vote for Gore. It did not work.

There was one West Virginia elector who was talking about voting for Kerry. Is he still on the slate? I have not heard anything about him for a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Do you have any links to news items regarding this effort?
That would be helpful. The WV elector said he would withhold his vote from Bush, not necessarily give it to Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Secret Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. We Can't Win Without 100% DNC and/or Kerry Support n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyPriest Donating Member (685 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
29. Why, indeed!
Bernie,I'm willing to give it a shot. Which of those states has electors most likely to even think about this? Probably not ID, ND, SD, UT, GA, TX or ID. I'd bet there are possibilities in AZ, AR, IA, MO, VA, IN, and LA. What's your bet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xtreme69 Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
20. So let me get this straight...
It's ok for the Electors to vote against the peoples will that they represent, so long as you agree with their vote. Hrm...I'm going to need a little more time to think on this one, but there may be something wrong with the logic. Think the pubbies would tear that apart, if it went anywhere at all (which I doubt).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renaissanceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. We're talking about proportioning the electors
in the states that do not mandate a winner-take-all approach.

That is representing the will of the people in those states. Don't forget that there ARE people who voted for Kerry in the red states.
--------------------
Buy liberal and progressive buttons, bumper stickers, and shirts at www.cafepress.com/liberalissues
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ahyums Donating Member (348 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
23. Unfortunately this is virtually impossible.
Electors are extremely unlikely to be persuadable, they represent the core of the base of the party, they are not swing voters. About the only thing that could possibly get them to change their vote would be solid demonstrable and absolute proof of fraud widespread enough not only to effect the electoral vote but also the popular vote, without that (and if that did/will exist there are other legal remedies anyway I think) getting 20 odd electors to change their votes would be a feat equivalent to getting George Bush Snr. to vote for Kerry, it's next to impossible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Yes. I think the losing party contemplates this strategy every election,
but to my knowledge, it has never happened in modern history. The parties make sure that their slate of electors are unswayable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
24. I think you have lost your way, berni_mccoy
If the will of the people truly is to keep George W. Bush in the White House, who are you or I to attempt to make things otherwise?

It seems to me the height of hubris, to impose MY will on others even if they are misguided.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyPriest Donating Member (685 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. Slack, the whole point of the fraud issue...
is that the "will of the people" may be MUCH different than we imagine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #30
45. Two word reply
"Or not."

I want the actual vote counted accurately, whichever way it turns out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. WIll of the PEOPLE? Are you Serious?
Edited on Wed Dec-08-04 02:27 PM by berni_mccoy
The evidence shows that the will of the people was misrepresented on election day doesn't matter to you...? 10s of thousands of cases of irregularities, thousands of cases of voter disenfranchisement, and Blackwell's (and others') blatent attempts to disallow large groups of the population a right to vote? That's not even getting to the FRAUD issue.

With all the above the side, have you ever thought our system was about the will of the people? Incredible if you did. Our system is not about that, and if we move forward with the current administration in power, the will of the people will be denegrated even further. Less than 1/2 of the voting population voted, so doe the other 1/2 of the people not have will? Are we sure they didn't try to vote?

We aren't playing a fair game here. And if we can convince 18 people to turn this election by doing the right thing, then I think that speaks LOUDLY to the will of the people. It has been done in the past, by both sides. And the will of the people have not demanded a change in the system. Here is some reading for you: http://www.fairvote.org/e_college/faithless.htm

And slackmaster, I mean no disrespect, but it is not I who have lost my way. It is you who has not found your way yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #31
44. Let's deal with concrete facts
The evidence shows that the will of the people was misrepresented on election day doesn't matter to you...?

I am not convinced that whatever fraudulent activity was involved in the 2004 election was sufficient to change the outcome. If it was, then the result needs to be changed. So far it has not been proved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. Don't just quote part of what I said
That's taking it out of context.

As I said:


"The evidence shows that the will of the people was misrepresented on election day doesn't matter to you...? 10s of thousands of cases of irregularities, thousands of cases of voter disenfranchisement, and Blackwell's (and others') blatent attempts to disallow large groups of the population a right to vote? That's not even getting to the FRAUD issue."


We don't need to get to Fraud to show that this election does not represent the will of the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
32. Maybe we could bribe them with that $29M check... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keepthemhonest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
33. i am so glad you started this thread
Conyers was very impressed with that man ,did anyone notice. This is definately exciting news. Please everyone keep us updated on what Conyers thinks about this, he said if it was true that we could win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
34. You're forgetting one thing
all of those people are registered republicans. they all want Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IAMREALITY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
35. Yeah, Good Luck On That One
This has been brought up multiple times on DU already. I know it is asked with good intentions, but the reality of it is that we have a better shot at the shrub conceding then overturing 18 extremely loyal republican electors.

Let's put it in perspective. The task is the same size as trying to convince not one, not two, but eighteen friggin Sean Hannity's to walk in a cast their vote for Kerry instead.

Look, I'm with ya on the heart, but in the reality-Ain't Gonna Happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gothmog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
36. Here is an article on Faithless Electors Watch
Edited on Wed Dec-08-04 03:22 PM by Gothmog
See http://slate.msn.com/id/2110786/

Four years ago, it struck me as a very real possibility that three Bush electors would betray the Republicans and cast their votes for Al Gore, thereby aligning Gore's popular-vote plurality with an Electoral College victory. After all, I reasoned, in recent presidential elections there had more often than not been a "faithless elector" (and if you count the "Greeley faithless," of whom only a tiny elite of Electoral College bores is aware, then going all the way back to George Washington there have been more faithless electors than presidential elections). Perhaps the trauma of Bush's popular-vote loss would persuade two Republicans outraged by the antidemocratic workings of the Electoral College to jump ship. There was, after all, no federal prohibition against their doing so, and state laws binding electors to the popular vote within their state are generally thought unconstitutional. The Nation magazine very naughtily urged that three Republican electors step forward to spare the nation four years of George W. Bush, which in retrospect sounds like an excellent idea. But it was not to be....

The magic number for 2004 is 18. If 18 Bush electors betray both their party and the popular vote and cast their votes for John Kerry on Dec. 13—when, as we Electoral College bores like to point out, the real presidential election takes place in state capitals around the country—then John Kerry will become president. It isn't remotely likely, and it would violate the principle of democratic government (just as the Electoral College itself does). But it remains in the realm of the possible.

The one presidential elector who has threatened to go faithless this year is a Republican. He is Richie Robb, mayor of Charleston, W. Va., and three months ago he was threatening to withhold his electoral vote from Bush to protest the president's policies. A little more than a month ago he reaffirmed that threat. After the election, Robb said that Bush's margin of victory in West Virginia was sufficiently great that he would probably vote for Bush after all, but he still refused to say so for certain. Today is the deadline for states to replace electors and still keep their electoral vote count "presumptively valid" when Congress formally tallies the votes on Jan. 5. (Yet another argument against the Electoral College: This ceremonial crap takes more than two months to wrap up.) Yet Robb, bafflingly, has not been dropped as a Bush elector. So that may be one faithless elector right there.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #36
47. that faithless elector article you posted - You may want to start a new
thread about it---Its very interesting, and might be a chance for us that we are overlooking (richie robb)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
37. Don't the State Legislators pick their electors
That's how it works in FL. Unfortunately, both houses in FL are REP. What is the status of the states on your list? If any of them are DEM we might have a chance.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
38. I think that would be a good idea if the 18 electors in the states
where fraud was proven (or Kerry got the most votes) would switch their vote. It's the right thing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
39. I suppose it's nor more difficult a path than impeaching ** Heck, let's go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VTGold Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
40. Did you notice that Conyers was exited too? His little face lit up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keepthemhonest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. yeah and of all people he should know what might be possible
or not, he seemed very impressed with the guy and that not any lawyers had mentioned the idea yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malatesta1137 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
41. if only Kerry
had a backbone and actually WANTED to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EMunster Donating Member (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
48. Pull it off and you might finally see some FBI action -- all 18 electors..

...and whomever else would be arrested under some RICO act, maybe even for treason. THAT would become the new FRAUD! story of the right. Those 18 would have to expect a hailstorm. At the very least, they'd be facing years of litigation defending themselves...lots of death threats...destroyed careers, etc.

That's how these people work.

You might find one brave, courageous and principled person among those electors willing to go the distance. Maybe even two. But 18? To repeat a comment upthread -- THEY ARE ALL REGISTERED REPUBLICANS. Anyone who's been supporting Bush's lies up to now isn't likely to suddenly become principled.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
49. Here is the current list of electors from Wikipedia
Edited on Wed Dec-08-04 04:46 PM by berni_mccoy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_electors%2C_2004

Of course, it's not complete yet, but definitely gives us a start on some of the states we are interested in.


2004 U.S. presidential electors, by state:

Alabama - Republican -
http://www.sos.state.al.us/downloads/election/2004/general/electors-bush.pdf

Beth Chapman (b. 1962) of Birmingham, at-large elector. Chapman is the Alabama State Auditor; a public relations and politcal consultant, she worked with several Republican campaigns in Alabama, serves as press secretary and campaign manager for Steve Windom, and was elected state auditor in 2002.
Marty Connors of Alabaster, at-large elector. Connors is the chair of the Alabama Republican Party.
Martha Hosey of Gulf Shore, elector for the 1st Congressional district. Hosey has been an officer in the Alabama Federation of Republican Women.
Will Sellers of Montgomery, elector for the 2nd Congressional district. Sellers, an attorney, is a veteran of multiple Republican campaigns.
Mike Hubbard of Auburn, elector for the 3rd Congressional district. Hubbard represents the 79th district in the Alabama House of Representatives, first elected in 1998.
Floyd Lawson of Cullman, elector for the 4th Congressional district.
Elbert Peters of Huntsville, elector for the 5th Congressional district.
Bettye Fine Collins of Trussville, elector for the 6th Congressional district.
Martha Stokes of Carrollton, Alabama, elector for the 7th Congressional district.


Alaska - Republican -
http://www.gov.state.ak.us/ltgov/elections/forms/2004electorslist.pdf

Gloria J. Tokar of Palmer, Alaska.
Frederick H. Hahn of Anchorage, Alaska.
Roberly R. Waldron of Anchorage, Alaska


Arizona - Republican

Linda Barber
Malcolm Barrett
Jim Click
Cynthia J. Collins
Webb Crockett
Elizabeth Wilkinson Fannin
Ross Farnsworth
Ira A. Fulton
Bernice C. Roberts
Phillip Townsend


Arkansas - Republican

California - Democratic - http://www.ss.ca.gov/elections/elector_list_2004.pdf

Robert H. Manley of Los Angeles, at-large elector.
Barbara Schraeger of Sausalito, at-large elector.
C. Paul Johnson of Napa, elector for the 1st Congressional district.
Gary Simmons of Chico, elector for the 2nd Congressional district.
Paul Batterson of Fair Oaks, elector for the 3rd Congressional district.
Diana Madoshi of Rocklin, elector for the 4th Congressional district.
Kyriakos Tsakopoulos of Granite Bay, elector for the 5th Congressional district.
Donald Linker of Tiburon, elector for the 6th Congressional district.
Paula Sandusky of Vacaville, elector for the 7th Congressional district.
Adam Woo of San Francisco, elector for the 8th Congressional district.
Chloe Drew of San Francisco, elector for the 9th Congressional district.
Karl Sliferv of San Ramon, elector for the 10th Congressional district.
Gary Prost of Livermore, elector for the 11th Congressional district.
Joseph Cotchett of Burlingame, elector for the 12th Congressional district.
John Smith of Fremont, elector for the 13th Congressional district.
George Marcus of Los Altos Hills, elector for the 14th Congressional district.
Mark Hsu of Atherton, elector for the 15th Congressional district.
Adele Bihn of San Jose, elector for the 16th Congressional district.
Darrell Darling of Santa Cruz, elector for the 17th Congressional district.
Amarjit Dhaliwal of Modesto, elector for the 18th Congressional district.
Rocco Davis of Roseville, elector for the 19th Congressional district.
Kenneth Costa of Fresno, elector for the 20th Congressional district.
Barbara Pyle of Fresno, elector for the 21st Congressional district.
David Johnson of Los Angeles, elector for the 22nd Congressional district.
Andrew M. Siegel of Santa Barbara, elector for the 23rd Congressional district.
Michael Carpenter of Lake View Terrace, elector for the 24th Congressional district.
Lynda Von Husen of Palmdale, elector for the 25th Congressional district.
Randy Monroe of Running Springs, elector for the 26th Congressional district.
Lane M. Sherman of Northridge, elector for the 27th Congressional district.
Moreen Blum of Sherman Oaks, elector for the 28th Congressional district.
Yolanda Dyer of Norwalk, elector for the 28th Congressional district.
Paul I. Goldenberg of La Habra Heights, elector for the 29th Congressional district.
Lenore Wax of Los Angeles, elector for the 30th Congressional district.
Mitch O'Farrell of Los Angeles, elector for the 31st Congressional district.
Franklin A. Acevedo of Los Angeles, elector for the 32nd Congressional district.
Gwen Moore of Los Angeles, elector for the 33rd Congressional district.
Pedro Carillo of Los Angeles, elector for the 34th Congressional district.
Karen Walters of Inglewood, elector for the 35th Congressional district.
Ted Lieu of Torrance, elector for the 36th Congressional district.
Valerie McDonald of Long Beach, elector for the 37th Congressional district.
Marvin Kropke of Pasadena, elector for the 39th Congressional district.
Douglas E. Hitchcock of Garden Grove, elector for the 40th Congressional district.
Barbara Kerr of iverside, elector for the 41st Congressional district.
Salvador Sanchez of Los Angeles, elector for the 42nd Congressional district.
Joe Baca, Jr. of San Bernardino, elector for the 43rd Congressional district.
Grant Gruber of Riverside, elector for the 44th Congressional district.
James T. Ewing of Yucaipa, elector for the 45th Congressional district.
Louise Giacoppe of Huntington Beach, elector for the 46th Congressional district.
James G. Bohm of Irvine, elector for the 47th Congressional district.
N. Mark Lam of Fountain Valley, elector for the 48th Congressional district.
Chuck Lowery of Oceanside, elector for the 49th Congressional district.
Susan Koehler of Carlsbad, elector for the 50th Congressional district.
Mary Salas of Chula Vista, elector for the 51st Congressional district.
Andrew Benjamin of Spring Valley, elector for the 52nd Congressional district.
Margaret Lawrence of San Diego, elector for the 53rd Congressional district.


Colorado - Republican
Connecticut - Democratic
Delaware - Democratic
District of Columbia - Democratic
Florida - Republican

Georgia - Republican - http://www.sos.state.ga.us/elections/presidential_electors_04.htm

Anna R. Cablik
Fred Cooper
Nancy N. Coverdell
James C. Edenfield
Karen Handel
Donald F. Layfield
Carolyn Dodgen Meadows
Sunny K. Park
Alex Poitevint
Joan Ransom
Nardender G. Reddy
Jame Raynolds
Norma Mountain Rogers
Eric J. Tanenblatt
Virgil Williams


Hawaii - Democratic
Idaho - Republican
Illinois - Democratic
Indiana - Republican
Iowa - Republican

Kansas - Republican - http://www.kssos.org/other/2004_Presidential_Electors.html

Ruth Garvey Fink of Topeka.
Bernard "Bud" Hentzen of Wichita.
Dennis Jones of Lakin.
Wanda Konold of Pratt.
Jack Ranson of Wichita.
Patricia Pitney Smith of Overland Park.


Kentucky - Republican
Louisiana - Republican
Maine - Democatic

Maryland - Democratic - http://www.elections.state.md.us/current_election/index.html

Norman Conway
Delores Kelley
Lainey Lebow Sachs
Pam Jackson
Dorothy Chaney
John Riley
Wendy Fielder
Daphne Bloomberg
Tom Perez
Gary Gensler


Massachusetts - Democratic
Michigan - Democratic
Minnesota - Democratic
Mississippi - Republican
Missouri - Republican
Montana - Republican
Nebraska - Republican
Nevada - Republican
New Hampshire - Democratic
New Jersey - Democratic
New Mexico - Republican
New York - Democratic

North Carolina - Republican

Joseph W. Powell, Jr.
Ann Sullivan
William B. Carraway
Sandra Carter
William H. Trotter
Thomas D. Luckadoo
Judy Keener
Marcia M. Spiegel
Dewitt Rhoades
Davey G. Williamson
Theresa Esposito
Elizabeth Kelly
Larry W. Potts
Joe Morgan
Robert Rector


North Dakota - Republican
Ohio - Republican
Oklahoma - Republican
Oregon - Democratic
Pennsylvania - Democratic
Rhode Island - Democratic

South Carolina - Republican - http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/electoral_college/2004_certificates/ascertainment_south_dakota.html

Dennis M. Daugaard
Larry Long
Mike Rounds


South Dakota - Republican
Tennessee - Republican

Texas - Republican - http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/electoral_college/2004_certificates/ascertainment_texas.html

Marcus Anderson
Bennie Bock
Bill Borden
Larry Bowles
Sue Brannon
Charles Burchett
Marjorie Chandler
Tom Cottar
Christopher DecLuitt
Jan Galbraith
Martha Greenlaw
Barbara Grusendorf
Kathy Haigler
Royce Hayes
Kim Hesley
Kristina Kiik
Lance Lenz
Loyce McCarter
Frank Morris
Dan Mosher
Roger O'Dell
Jay Pierce
Mike Provost
Anna Rice
Rhealyn Samuelson
Nancy Stevens
Cheryl Surber
Mike Ussery
Glenn Warren
Susan Weddington
Jim Wiggins
Morris Woods
Peter Wrench
Sid Young


Utah - Republican

Vermont - Democratic - http://vermont-elections.org/elections1/2004GEPresElectors.pdf

Billi Gosh of Brookfield.
Paul Highberg of Woodstock.
Jeffry Taylor of Clarendon.


Virginia - Republican
Washington - Democratic
West Virginia - Republican
Wisconsin - Democratic


Wyoming - Republican - http://soswy.state.wy.us/election/2004/elector.htm

Linda Barker of Cheyenne.
Jack Van Mark of Torrington.
Mike Baker of Thermopolis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC