VTGold
(438 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-04 03:02 PM
Original message |
Worried about backlash... |
|
Edited on Wed Dec-08-04 03:21 PM by VTGold
This is a real dilemma.
The biggest crime of November 2nd is also our best chance at getting the most attention - the disenfranchisement of African-American and other people of color in Ohio, Florida and elsewhere.
Plus there is more historic case-law on racism than anything else we could attack on.
It is also going to be very hard to prove to the great un-washed what the electronic voting scandal is all about. Its also hard to prove and probably easy to hide.
But - I'm very concerned about backlash against African-Americans. The panel we saw today was primarily African-American and the biggest voice so far is Jessie Jackson.
Did anyone else hear the caller on C-SPAN last week when Arnebeck was on? (you can watch it on C-SPAN site). He was so ugly - his voice shaking with rage - he said "I will not let you touch my president" or something to that effect. I thought then - "we're going to see violence from these people".
Maybe we can pass this concern onto our reps in the House and Senate too - extra incentive to get involved.
I was in tears listening to the Rally in Columbus last Saturday. Right then and there I wrote to Kerry and Biden on this very matter - saying that we as Americans CAN NOT accept this.
So that's my dilemma - the disenfranchisement of people of color across the country is the most painful aspect of what was done to us on November 2nd and we must pursue it to its conclusion - but I'm worried....
|
jsascj
(425 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-04 03:04 PM
Response to Original message |
Razorback_Democrat
(756 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-04 03:05 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Did anyone else hear the caller on C-SPAN last week when Arnebeck was on? |
VTGold
(438 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-04 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. Sorry - I should have described it better - there were a couple... |
|
...of negative called but one guy was just furious at Arnebeck and said he wasn't going to let Arnebeck, us Dems, whoever - touch his president - and his voice was shaking with rage. I was spooked - I'll tell you.
|
goddess40
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-04 03:05 PM
Response to Original message |
3. The right doesn't worry about backlash |
|
we need to stop worrying about the what ifs and do what's right.
|
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-04 03:08 PM
Response to Original message |
4. They SHOULD be worried about backlash. |
|
Fascists governments have a nasty habit of ending badly.+
|
VTGold
(438 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-04 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
9. Facists are also expert scapegoaters and I'm worried about.... |
|
...backlash against minority Democrats.
I can't help but think these neo-cons would LOVE a race war
|
w13rd0
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-04 03:12 PM
Response to Original message |
|
...still roaming the streets. They think they are on the verge of returning to their heyday, purging their neighborhoods of liberals and minorities and immigrants. Any threat to that will certainly be met with rage and gnashing of teeth. Backlash? Frankly, what kind of backlash do you think can occur? You think after 30 years of progress, fighting and trying to move two steps forward for every step pushed back, people concerned with equality and democracy and moving foward, you think some we're not ready? The knuckledraggers have evaluated the situation. The only way they can move us backward, to the place they want us, is through reactionary, non-democratic means. They know people are being disenfranchised. They are COUNTING on it. Can't go back to the 3/5th rule all of a sudden. But you can do it thru crafty equations.
A little nudge here, a push there, a story planted over there, and you've got plausible deniability and a perfect opening for a 3 pt bump. Oh, and you should be worried. Historic times.
|
Kolesar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-04 03:15 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I thought Arnebeck's response to that psycho-cspan-caller was great |
|
Arnebeck said that all Americans would want to know that the election was done lawfully.
|
VTGold
(438 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-04 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. Yeah - he was very calm and didn't allow himself to be baited n/t |
righteous1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-04 03:26 PM
Response to Original message |
10. If fraud can be proven with bonafide hard evidence there will |
|
be no significant problem. If it is not proven a backlash could definately come, but in the next election. That is why it is imperative that little doubt remain
|
DoYouEverWonder
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-04 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. In order to win the case for fraud in this election |
|
it has to be in terms that even Joe Six Pack can understand.
It will have to be simple and graphic and undeniable.
|
righteous1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-04 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
15. Precisely, innuendo, anecdotal evidence, likely scenarios etc |
|
aint gonna cut it. Need stone cold hard evidence
|
Straight Shooter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-04 03:28 PM
Response to Original message |
11. If the racists want to rear their ugly heads, then let them be exposed |
|
Let everybody see just how pathetic and rotten they are.
What a shining example to the world America is, to let a tainted election stand, one which was engineered through obstruction, suppression and intimidation of the minority vote.
When we lose our "moral authority" in the world, when the ugly hypocritical mask comes off, it's over. There will be no more telling other countries what to do with their elections, or how to conduct them, we will have no standing to judge.
And without the ability to interfere in the elections of other countries, America loses a tremendous amount of leverage. Look at the animosity between bush and Putin over the Ukraine. Putin says, "Who is the USA to talk about fair elections and exit poll results"?
Lots of reasons, both altruistic and selfish, for The Powers That Be to make sure this election proves to be based on democracy rather than plutocracy.
|
VTGold
(438 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-04 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
16. Yeah, but have you noticed that they aren't hiding their racism.... |
|
... and bigotry anymore?
Bigots used to at least whisper when they spewed their vile - now they're coming right out and trying to pass laws against gays and re-districting areas to keep African-American representation down.
They don't care anymore. They feel emboldened.
Puke
|
dogindia
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-04 03:31 PM
Response to Original message |
|
is what we have to embody. Fighting this thing is difficult. Some of the republicans are like pit bulls. They only know "what is good for me" is the only thing that matters and everyone else be damned. Not pretty. Perhaps that is why so many democrats are so quiet. They just don't want to have to fight. Their beings are peaceful and not very mean.
|
Shalom
(832 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-04 03:32 PM
Response to Original message |
14. If people worried about backlash, Civil Rights Movement would have died. |
|
Let us never hold back or be intimidated by Big Brother with the argument that we need to be careful and quiet in protesting the sodomy they are inflicting upon America, or "things could even get worse".
Let us instead fight with every atom of our being, let us "live free or die", because to live as slaves to the Bushitler dynasty is not a life worth living.
|
DemGa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-04 03:39 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Don't worry we are in this together n/t |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:29 PM
Response to Original message |