Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Call to Action: The Second American Revolution

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Shalom Donating Member (832 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 09:20 PM
Original message
A Call to Action: The Second American Revolution
Edited on Wed Dec-08-04 09:35 PM by Shalom
While the struggle continues on a daily basis to uncover the truth behind the 2004 Presidential election, and others immediately preceding, these efforts are hampered by the lack of an objective strategy and game plan. The objective of this essay is to try to establish a framework for a logical understanding of the existing situation, and to help generate a manifesto in the future that will provide a compass to guide us in the Second American Revolution.

Based upon this dialog, it is hoped that a second Declaration of Independence be drafted and signed by those who are willing to pledge their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor.

This essay is structured in three sections: the first discusses the background of the current situation; the second looks at the immediate present, and the third looks forward towards the future.

I Democracy In America Has Gradually Been Usurped

The overall battle is based upon the belief that the control of America has been usurped in a major, unprecedented fashion, and that the electoral process has been dangerously, and perhaps fatally, compromised. Those who accept this premise may disagree over it’s inception. Some argue this usurpation began in 1963 with the gangland style execution of President Kennedy by a shooting gallery in Dealey Plaza in Dallas, followed by the immediate escalation of a small conflict in Vietnam to a full scale, protracted war, in which millions of Vietnamese civilians were murdered by the United States of America.

Others believe the usurpation of power dates back to the theft of the Presidential election by the Republican party apparatus in 2000. There are a small few who believe that Bush stole the 2004 election, and won the 2000 election fair and square.

Suffice it to say while there is disagreement over the time frame in which it occurred, ranging over a period of some 40 years, those who feel our previously flawed democracy has been replaced by a radically dangerous one are united upon a single principle: that what has been stolen from us must be returned. To do less is to dishonor the many who gave up their lives and their fortunes to establish this country, and protect and defend it.

II Our Federal Government Is Presently Completely Controlled by the Republican Party

The traditional two-party system in America is in danger of fragmenting for several reasons. One is that the Republican party seems determined to consolidate their control over all three branches of government, and to a large extent the media, as well as religious institutions, and while paying lip service to bi-partisanship, brutally suppress all opposition and dissent, even within their own ranks. Many who are concerned over the theft of the electoral process consider the Republican party to be guilty of trying to perpetuate their rule, analogous to the declaration of the 1,000 year Reich by the Nazi party.

The second reason the two-party system is in danger is that while the Republican party is guilty, the Democratic party is becoming suspect. It does not seem to want to fight the good fight down to the last soldier – the Republicans, becoming aware of this, sense that they should never compromise, but keep pushing relentlessly until the Democrats fold their tents and surrender.

For those who feel the 2000 election marked a watershed in what had been a gradual attrition of democratic rights, and the 2002/2004 cycle a radical extension of this trend, a very strong conclusion follows, based upon an extension of an old adage: Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame of me; fool me thrice, you are my enemy.

Applying this to the Democratic party, the message is very simple: either you are for us, or you are against us (this phrase has been used by the fascists in control of America, and needs to be reclaimed by decent people).

III A Second American Revolution Is Required

Much has been made of the advantages of modern technology to both allow external enemies to attack us, or to allow internal despots to control us. However, it is a simple and obvious fact that the American people have a tremendous amount of power, which if mobilized can sweep away the controlling powers in an instant. Consider what would happen if millions of people marched and protested, if tens of millions of citizens just engaged in passive resistance and civil disobedience, and if tens of thousands of our brave young men and women in Iraq just refused to be used any longer. The control of America is very much like the Wizard of Oz, who uses imagery, and smoke and mirrors, to be appear to be omnipotent, until discovered to be an empty shell.

The time frame for this second revolution cannot be predicted: there is a small, but a real chance that within the next 4 weeks dramatic revelations will surface to prove that that the 2004 election has been a complete and utter fraud, and that Bush and Cheney will be driven out of office in disgrace. No matter what the odds, those who believe that their government has been stolen must struggle for justice every hour and every day to correct this crime. At the 0conclusion of Hemmingway’s “For Whom The Bell Tolls”, Robert Jordan is dying, yet as he dies he focuses on a last effort to destroy the fascists. The same logic applies to the existing situation in the near term.

However, this effort would be foolish if it did not realize that victory may not come in the next 4 weeks. The first American Revolution certainly did not succeed so easily. As such, there must be an understanding that if Bush and Cheney are inaugurated in January 2005, that there will be a doubling of our efforts, beginning on the day of their coronation, and continuing for the next four years.

Consider this: will the battle hardened veterans of this struggle just give up, and allow the current situation to continue for perpetuity ? It is very doubtful. But to be successful, markers must be put done and realized, not just in time for the 2008 election, but the 2006 election as well. Consider this: will these battle hardened veterans accept any future election in which there is not complete transparency and verification ? Will these battle hardened veterans allow political appointees to continue to control and corrupt the voting process ? Will these battle hardened veterans allow our future elections to be governed by proprietary software and machines that cannot be examined ?

The writing is on the wall, and those in control may have succeeded in a way they will regret. This is the simple and eternal lesson of history, which has seen so many despots, from Ozymandias to Hitler to the Bush dynasty, decay and crumble, and be swept away by the winds and the sands.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
operafred Donating Member (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. well said!
for a similar statement see

WHY WE MUST NOT “GET OVER IT”


www.crisispapers.org/essays/get-over-it.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shalom Donating Member (832 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes, It Hits All the Same Buttons...
Thanks for pointing this out. The author documents the crimes we have suffered much better than I have, and shares my view opinion as a "grassy knoll" conspiracy theorist of the Kennedy assassination !

I think the only thing new I may be adding is pespective: that in order to win, we should not see it as a collection of minor corrections, but a second War of Independence, and that this will require a army of citizen soldiers to organize and mobilize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
operafred Donating Member (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. i second that
your core thought is what i've been feeling for a long time as you must have as well, and i'm so glad that you've been voicing it so strongly and well.

i'm convinced that when the thought has become VOICE, it starts moving people, "We, the People"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shalom Donating Member (832 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Great Minds Think Alike ! (Sing the Same Song ?)....
Welcome to DU - may your days here be rewarding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirrera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Agree!...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. Blueprints: The No Confidence Movement
I have been operating from the same essential framework laid out here. This has led to the creation of the No Confidence Resolution.

There are two central notions:

1. There is no BASIS for confidence in the legitimacy of the results reported from US federal elections.

2. Bogus elections constitute denial of the Consent of the Governed.

The resolution has to contend with the negative perception associated with its name. This is achieved by including in the resolution eight specific positive changes that would create a new BASIS for confidence. In this way, revolution is pursued through mainstream, non partisan appeals to democracy and fairness, usually presented under the guise "what would be better?"

The more macro view is for City Councils across the country to adopt the resolution, much like the 300+ anti-Patriot Act resolutions that have passed. Where No Confidence would differ is in its ability to generate cumulative impact. This is done by repeating the question, "has the Consent of the Governed been withdrawn, YET?" with passage of each new resolution. After the first one, two, several...the answer will be NO. But after 25 or 50 or 100 such resolutions, the answer will go from NO to YES, the Consent of the Governed HAS been withdrawn.

This will allow for leaders of No Confidence communities to begin coordinating and developing the architecture of the post-revolution America (which need not necessarily be 50 United/Divided States). For more on the overall strategy, plus talking points designed to assist with letter writing, phone calls, etc., please see the No Confidence Movement Primer. You may also want to get more background - the local media of Humboldt County, CA gave quite a bit of coverage to this over the summer when an earlier version of the resolution came before the Arcata City Council, only to be watered down and passed as a useless false alternative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Kick (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shalom Donating Member (832 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Thanks GuvWorld: Great Minds Think Alike !!
We need to leverage off your "No Confidence Movement" to provide a bsis for ACTION: HOW DO WE TAKE BACK WHAT HAS BEEN STOLEN FROM US ??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. re: HOW DO WE TAKE BACK WHAT HAS BEEN STOLEN FROM US ??
Results may not be immediate, but action has already begun. As I wrote in the GuvWurld blog, the No Confidence Resolution has been submitted to the Eureka, CA City Council. Get a group of people together in your area and take it to your City Council. Think global and act local.

Also, many things have been stolen from us. The first one we need to reclaim is reality. Try this on for a slogan and tell me what you think - Reclaiming Reality! This is not vague or empty rhetoric. I really mean that people must be shown the contradictions in their thoughts, specifically the ones brought on by the cognitive dissonance of everything Orwellian happening today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shalom Donating Member (832 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. Slogan Should Have "DEMOCRACY' in it, plus other ideas...
I understand your use of the word "reality", since the technique being used to deprive us of our democracy is to use images, pycho-ops, and double-speak to create a pseudo-reality that contradicts what we see and read with our own eyes.

But the fundamental message to me is that the 1st American Revolution was fought for democracy, and the techniques now being used are depriving us of this gift. I've tried to come up with a snappy slogan that doesn't sound stale, and couldn't settle upon a single one. Perhaps something along the lines of:

DEMOCRACY NOW !
RECLAIM DEMOCRACY !
DEMAND DEMOCRACY !
WE WANT OUR DEMOCRACY BACK !

Along the lines of your city council resolutions, this can seed the effort by starting in more progressive communities. Maybe you have ideas about a parallel effort to unite and mobilize those in communities that (at the moment) cannot reach the critical mass in their own communites to pass the resolution. Think about it: if we have 1/3 of the voters in every community behind us, we could not pass a single resolution, yet would have 10's of millions of people on our side.

This is why I believe we need to draft a 2nd Declaration of Independence, and have 100-200 leaders sign it, because we don't need approval from anyone to do so.

Furthermore, it would be neat to draft it..I imagine one could borrow the language of the 1st document, along the lines of:


"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to RESTORE the political bands OF DEMOCRACY which have connected them with EACH OTHER, and to RESUME among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, WHICH THEY HAVE ENJOYED AND LOST, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the RESTORATION OF DEMOCRACY."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Those are great suggestions
It is so hard to know exactly what phrase will be most likely to resonate and endure. In the business world, a lot of money is spent just to test market such messages. I'm certainly not attached to Reclaiming Reality as a top-line slogan, though I expect it will persist in a small talk sort of way in my daily interactions.

Regarding your suggestions, I appreciate that you are coming at it from a place of "what would be better?" (than my idea). With this same mentality, I say to your suggestions that I like having the word NOW in there. However, it seems to me that restoring democracy where currently only a myth exists is going to take time and likely be the struggle of our lives. We can DEMAND DEMOCRACY NOW but that doesn't in any way mean that we can expect the revolutionary process to be shorter.

So, what else do we want now, that can actually happen now, pending only arrival at a critical mass tipping point? That is, what message is most likely to move people to an immediate action most likely to feel as if success is contingent only on getting others to join? Again, that is, how to give new movement members the genuine optimistic hope that we are just a few more members away from hitting our magic number, making our NOW demand a reality? Could it be: REVOLUTION NOW! ??

Regarding the 1/3 of a community point, this actually came up in a meeting last night. We resolved to seek cooperation from disparate community groups, the less partisan the better, all behind the "what would be better?" notion that stems from the No Confidence Resolution and the explicit changes it calls for to create a new BASIS for confidence in elections. Even the most "patriotic" Bush fan ought to be open to elections that leave less or no real grounds for doubt about the outcome and its legitimacy. The deal to be made with such people is, if you think people should stop challenging or complaining about the outcome, work with us to create conditions that will make it unnecessary to do so.

Finally, I am all for drafting a new Declaration based on the original and I think you are off to a great start! Please pursue this further and continue to share your work here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
operafred Donating Member (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. what about
Democracy Rising
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. Absolutely agreed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaulVB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. Well said! (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
11. Kick (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4democracy Donating Member (285 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 03:08 AM
Response to Original message
13. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Town Jake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 04:00 AM
Response to Original message
14. Well there's five minutes of my life I wish I had back...
...more grandiose horseshit ramblings whose sole effect (if not intent) is to provide grist for the freeper mills, a' la "look what those nasty liberals are saying over at DU! Isn't it just outrageous!!"
Tsk, tsk, la de da, and all of that. Get real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Griffy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 05:19 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. and some DUers will be inspired in these tense moments...
before the battle... for those like me that are about to march this weekend.... will I be alone, or will other stand with me... I believe more each day that I am not alone! the time for action is upon us... mobilize and march!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Town Jake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Ah-yeah - right...whatever you say...
... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shalom Donating Member (832 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. You Are Worried About Ridicule from the Freepers ??
If so, we are dead as a doornail.

The people who established this country had grandiose visions that were ridiculed by many, but they knew they were right, and kept on a 'comin.

If we are not their children, we have lost the spirit that makes America a free country.

Imagine Thomas Jefferson and George Washington worrying about what a bunch of fucking freepers would say on their blogs !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KnowerOfLogic Donating Member (841 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
15. Secession. The North will rise again! We hold these truths to be.... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC