RaulVB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-04 03:30 AM
Original message |
Rural Christians are worth crap, Bush "won" in the city, Mitofsky says |
|
Edited on Thu Dec-09-04 03:32 AM by RaulVB
Taking a look at CNN's fixed exit polls, you can find some startling numbers:
VOTE BY REGION
BUSH KERRY NADER
TOTAL 2004 2000 2004 2004 Northeast (22%) 43% +4 56% 1% Midwest (26%) 51% +2 48% 0% South (32%) 58% +3 42% 0% West (20%) 49% +3 50% 1%
- VOTE BY SIZE OF COMMUNITY
BUSH KERRY NADER
TOTAL 2004 2000 2004 2004 Big Cities (13%) 39% +13 60% * Smaller Cities (19%) 49% +9 49% 0% Suburbs (45%) 52% +3 47% 0% Small Towns (8%) 50% -9 48% 1% Rural (16%) 59% +0 40% 1%
- VOTE BY SIZE OF COMMUNITY
BUSH KERRY NADER
TOTAL 2004 2000 2004 2004 Urban (30%) 45% +10 54% 0% Suburban (46%) 52% +3 47% 0% Rural (25%) 57% -2 42% 0%
* The source of all this info is Mitofsky's company.
THE TRUTH is that Senator Kerry's totals in ALL THE STATES HE WON WERE FAR BETTER THAN GORE'S NUMBERS.
Moreover, in Nevada Kerry "the flip-flopper" gained a dramatically LARGER number of votes over what Gore did in 2000.
BUT THE LYING BASTARDS OF CNN UNTIL TODAY INSIST THAT BUSH "WON BIG" IN THE CITIES.
The rural vote, according to CNN's numbers changed -2% for Bush respect to 2000!
And could you please tell me HOW IN THE HELL BUSH'S WEST TOTALS ARE BETTER THAN IN 2000 WHEN I LIVE IN OREGON AND KERRY BEAT HIS ASS HANDILY IN THIS STATE???
|
Carolab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-04 03:34 AM
Response to Original message |
|
We ALL know that * got the Yokel Vote.
This is an OUTRAGE.
Send this crap to KO and demand he ask for that data. I have asked him this once already. MSNBC is a subscriber, no? Then why can't they ask for the data? Anyone else want to try?
Kolbermann@msnbc.com
|
RaulVB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-04 03:43 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
I CANNOT BEGIN TO TELL YOU HOW ANGRY I FEEL!
SO WE ARE ALL A BUNCH OF MORONS LIVING IN THE USA!!!
|
bullimiami
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-04 03:39 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Lies. Trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. |
|
Bush won so we need to find the justification for it in our data.
Only problem is they dont fit.
|
ClintCooper2003
(629 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-04 03:51 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Yes Kerry's overall vote totals were better than Gore's, but his... |
|
percentage of the tallied votes went down in a lot of states, like New York, Connecticut, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and most notably, California. His percentages did go up in Oregon (fraud-proof?) and Washington, along with Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont.
|
RaulVB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-04 04:00 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Yes, OREGON IS FRAUD PROOF! |
|
Correct. They had to do "vote padding" in the states where Kerry won big, like California and New Jersey, so the "mandate" claim would have made sense.
THE PROBLEM IS THAT THE MSM IS BENDING OVER TO THE WH TO DEFEND THEIR CLAIMS ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF THE RURAL VOTERS AND MORAL VALUES, when that is clearly a full load of crap designed to convince the morons that still watch TV in order to get their "news"...
|
Griffy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-04 04:05 AM
Response to Original message |
6. NYCers... maybe we can get them to rally at his office n/t |
skids
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-04 04:53 AM
Response to Original message |
7. CHECK OUT THIS. This one is baldfaced. |
|
According to Mitofski, People who voted for Bush in 2000 turned out in droves this year. Even the ones that were dead. Even the ones that never existed in the first place. Must have been the ghosts of the unborn! http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x125913#126143
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:36 AM
Response to Original message |