A tidbit from Clermont, OH results.

[skids]

(EDIT: just figured out why people aren't getting it: I wrote
"10%" when I meant to write "10 times" fixed.)

Just a little morsel I found while hunting for OH precinct data:

                      Absentee	Nov2	Prov	Total	Percentage
Bush & Cheney 	        5647	56278	1021	62946	70.60%
Kerry & Edwards 	2684	22752	449	25885	29.03%
Badnarik & Campagna 	7	141	1	149	0.17%
Peroutka & Baldwin 	6	80	1	87	0.10%
Write In Votes 	        11	76	3	90	0.10%
Total Votes Cast 	8355	79327	1475	89157	100.00%

Note the totals for Badnarick.

In all other categories, the votes cast on election day are around
10 times more or less, usually less, than the Absentee votes. In
Badnarick's case, it is twice that. Curiously, the only other one
above 1000% is also a 3rd party candidate. The next highest: Bush.

[spooked911]

1. please re-explain

what you wrote isn't making sense to me.

[skids]

3. The long and short of it is...

That for some reason, it looks like Badnarick may have gotten some
votes "by mistake" on Nov 2. His numbers in the absentee ballots
are out of line with his numbers on Nov 2.

[EMunster]

2. I'm not getting it either

[Quakerfriend]

4. I do see what you are saying

And, it also appears that perhaps some votes were skimmed from Kerry, too---If you go by this trend. However, this does not provide solid proof of anything.

[skids]

5. Agreed. It just points out what to look for and where. n/t