Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ohio lockdown a case of prima facie election fraud? Look at this:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
pointsoflight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 01:03 PM
Original message
Ohio lockdown a case of prima facie election fraud? Look at this:
Edited on Sun Dec-12-04 02:01 PM by pointsoflight
Ohio Revised Code, Section 3599.161 makes it a crime for any employee of the Board of Elections to knowingly prevent or prohibit any person from inspecting the public records filed in the office of the Board of Elections.

Ohio Revised Code, Section 3599.42 states: "A violation of any provision of Title XXXV (35) of the Revised Code constitutes a prima facie case of election fraud within the purview of such Title."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gyre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good find!
You have a brilliant future in the law.

Gyre
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. You have of course sent this to Arnebeck and Cleveland Plain Dealer :)
arnebeck@aol.com

I don't know CPD's addy

Don't forget to send it to the man, KOlbermann@msnbc.com

Excellent find. Thank Gawd you don't work for the "other side" :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. No need to email it...
They already have it. It is posted at the end of the original article (all over the internet, and posted on DU several times) about the Ohio volunteers being prevented from examining the books in Greene County.

No need to clog the inboxes of these guys with information they already have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Well, excuse me
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dzika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Yep. Arnebeck has it.
He was on the phone many times yesterday afternoon with the GP Recount Coordinator at the Greene County BOE. They are the ones that wrote the original "lock-down" press release (with the consent of Mr. Arnebeck) that was posted by Ray Beckerman:
http://fairnessbybeckerman.blogspot.com/2004/12/blackwell-locks-out-recount-volunteers.html#110273375598353734
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pointsoflight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Sorry for the dupe, must've missed it in the article. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
read the law first Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
30. Maybe I'm missing something.
I thought that we were all posting a week ago that somebody make sure that these ballots were locked down and under tight security until the recounts and not available to any potential mischief. I don't want the pukes messing with the ballots but it seems somewhat silly to say pukes can't look at the ballots but we can. I think it is better for these ballots to be under lock and key and good security until the recounts. Now, if the point is that non-governmental employee pukes DO have access and we don't, then we need to storm the Bastille right away.

Let the recounts begin! NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VTGold Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm sure it says in tiny print "Except for the Grand Poobah" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
7th_Sephiroth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. complain ot the FBI about blackwell
they WILL investigate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Higans Donating Member (819 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. For our Children
This isn't just about this election, It is about the next one too. It's about 06 and 08 and 10. This is about our children's Children. If election reform is not completed No one may ever have the right to vote again.

It's so obvious a cause. we need paper trails and real Auditing. I'm doing this for you and your children. I'm doing this for my birth Mother who I haven't scene since I was born. Thats what this is about.

The truth is this. For the last 3 elections if not more the computer ballot boxes have been rigged. Large scale rigged. If this is not obvious to you, your not paying attention. Even if I can't get a fair game this time, I want a fair game next time. Thousands of people around the world are protesting.

the constitution grants All Humans the right to vote. not just the two or three who control the central tabulators. The reason it was not fixed in 04 after 2000 is because no one said anything after 2000. The only way it will ever get fixed by 06 and 08 is if we stand up and say something NOW.

Do the people of this country ever want their right to vote? I'm starting to wonder. So far Crowds are showing up in the 100's at multiple state capitals. I'm going now. I hope all the peace loving people join me there.

I :heart U Human Race. Happy Holidays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dzika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. Update - Conyer's Press Release about Greene County "lock-down"
FROM: Ohio Election Fraud Blog
http://fairnessbybeckerman.blogspot.com/2004/12/congressman-conyers-alarmed-at-efforts.html

December 12, 2004

CONGRESSMAN CONYERS ALARMED AT EFFORTS TO OBSTRUCT OHIO RECOUNT EFFORT, CALLS WITNESSES TO MONDAY HEARING


PRESS RELEASE
CONGRESSMAN JOHN CONYERS, JR.
FOURTEENTH DISTRICT, MICHIGAN
RANKING MEMBER, COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY
DEAN, CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS
__________________________________________
IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
December 12, 2004
CONTACT:
Dena Graziano (202) 226-6888

-snip-
Conyers Alarmed at Efforts to Obstruct Ohio Recount Effort, Calls
Witness to Monday Hearing to Detail Such Efforts

Yesterday, it came to the attention of the House Judiciary Committee
Democratic Staff that efforts to audit poll records in Greene
County, Ohio are being obstructed by County Election officials
and/or Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell. According to Joan
Quinn and Eve Robertson, two election observers researching voting
records, Greene County officials initially gave Quinn and Robertson
access to poll records, and then abruptly withdrew such access.
Greene County Director of Elections Carole Garman claimed that she
had withdrawn access to the voting records at the direction of
Secretary Blackwell. Regardless of who ordered the denial of this
access, such an action appears to violate Ohio law. Later, at the
same office, election observers found the office unlocked, and what
appeared to be locked ballot boxes, unattended. Prior to the
withdrawal of access to the books, observers had found discrepancies
in election records, and possible evidence of minority vote
suppression.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. More from the press release:
Because of the urgency of the Greene County matter, Congressman John Conyers, Jr., Ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, has requested that Ms. Quinn testify at a hearing scheduled Monday in Columbus, Ohio. Ms. Quinn has agreed to do so and will also present sworn statements from corroborating witnesses.

Conyers issued the following statement:

"The Recount effort is simply a search for the truth of what happened during the 2004 Presidential election in Ohio. We have now repeatedly seen election officials obstruct and stonewall this search for the truth. I am beginning to wonder what it is they are trying to hide."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. w00t!
Conyers doesn't take any shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IAMREALITY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Ya Know, I'm Reallllly Startin to Think Kerry Will Be Inaugurated Jan 20th
A thought to which a repub aquaintance said "Good for you. * will just run in 2008 and whip your asses!"

Never thought of it like that, and actually paused for a moment, only a moment, to think about the ramifications of that.

But then the moment passed, and it hit me "Wait, No He can't, Convicted Felons aren't even allowed to vote let along run for President"

hehe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. Sad things is, Reality, I already thought he was a convicted felon. His
arrest for DUI in Kennenbunkport, Maine. (Sigh) I think he's been the only (un)president to have a record! Or, has there been anyone else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frictionlessO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. been following this since it broke out big on DU yesterday morning
This is what Ive been waiting for. If Conyers is releasing on it to the press, theres going to be action taken. No friggin' doubt about it now, Monday is the day we find out how truly scewed we are, versus how badly we get to screw them.

Im still wondering what the two observers picked up on yesterday, that was being kept hushy? Ayone feel like PMing what they think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Read my comments above. I spoke by phone with one of the
observers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. On Saturday the lights were on and the door unlocked to
one of the precincts in Dayton. I personally spoke by phone to one of the recount group who told me that on Saturday morning when they arrived at the precinct, the lights were on and the doors unlocked. They called the police who came, looked around and declared that nothing was missing. Shortly thereafter a man claiming to be a locksmith for the Shawnee lock company, made a new key and left. That's all I was told. Think about it. On Friday, the precinct office was giving out the information that the voting records were being locked down, but one day later, anyone in the world could have walked in and stolen anything thing, including computer disks, and paper documents. This stinks!

I still have the number of the lady with whom I spoke and intend to call her again today for an update.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frictionlessO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Thanks ladjf!! give us an update if ya get one!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. what I'm afraid of is that they used the time period between the lockdown,
and the finding of the unlocked precinct to alter or completely substitute the ballots. Any chance they could have done that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Of course. If they are going to walk off and leave crucial
documents unattended, anything could happen. They could then claim a burglary. A Boston Post reporter has said that there will be an article in the paper about the Greene County lock down. I doubt that he has heard the story about the doors being left open. I tried to contact the Globe today with no success.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. I believe I must send another heads-up to Mr. Olberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyPriest Donating Member (685 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
11. You know what really pisses me off?
Laws about election fraud are real. They've got teeth. But are they EVER enforced?? Geezus...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liam97 Donating Member (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Where is the article
which acknowledges the prima facie case? I missed it too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyPriest Donating Member (685 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Liam: look up, top of this thread! - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. Here is the address of the article about the shutdown
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Only if you're a DEM
Edited on Sun Dec-12-04 02:17 PM by DoYouEverWonder
apparently.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
16. How I love prima facie statutes.
It makes things so easy. Now where is that silly ole rethug Attorney General of Ohio? Does party loyalty override his sworn duty to uphold the laws of his State?

IMPEACH - impeach - impeach!

Prima facie -- what a lovely term!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pointsoflight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
34. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
18. Don'tcha have to ask
What the hell are they doing? I mean really, if you want to look guilty in addition to probably being guilty, wouldn't you do something like this? This is almost as stupid as the guy that went to get the deposit on the van back after the first WTC bombing. !*%$# Darwin Award candidates. WTF?

I have a theory:

All of this BS is about getting JK to come out of the corner. The BFEE is not going to waste its time fighting the small fish. They are going to do everything they can to stall and block until the only recourse is for JK himself to come out and make a public request for the recount. Then, the gloves are off. Thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyPriest Donating Member (685 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Give the lady a cigar!
I've thought all along that Cobb and Badnarik are Kerry proxies. And if I've thought that, I can't imagine it has escaped entry into Rove's crafty peabrain. The sweet thing is that if Kerry can keep his head down, BushCo is going to have to face the LAW, not Kerry. They've LOVE to draw Kerry into this to make it personal. The MSM would make it into the bar fight they love. A major distraction. Bush vs. Gore, round 2. Hah, not this time. Amazing to think that the "small fish" are the ones who will bring down THE MACHINE. The strategy is VERY good -- C and B initiate the recount, Kerry supports. Arnebeck initiates the lawsuit. C and B and Arnebeck share info. Arnebeck, Kerry's longtime good bud, keeps Kerry up-to-date. It's a one-two punch. That's the way I would have done it. And damned if it doesn't look like that's the way it's working.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Yes
If it's true, it's brilliant. No BvG this time. This may be my Perfect Storm.

What's been killing us is the deafening silence, suspect in itself. That video with its "man in exile" feel and innuendo-heavy wording, the entire DNC and its leaders repeating the same mantra -- Rovian-style psyops. It's all indicative of something. If not, where the hell are all the pods?

The Rs have sent out only Stepford Wives and a junior criminal congressman to fight. So unlike them. There is a larger game going on. I feel it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Maybe that is why he hasn't come out yet, he wants to make
sure that his gloves are the proper weight and are on tight. He knows they will go gunning for him, so he wants to be well trained and well armed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandem5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
28. good find! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC