Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Summit county same in 3% hand recount-rest hit the machines at 8:00am

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
kuozzman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 05:02 AM
Original message
Summit county same in 3% hand recount-rest hit the machines at 8:00am
http://www.ohio.com/mld/beaconjournal/news/local/states/ohio/counties/portage_county/10429392.htm

By law, counties must recount by hand 3 percent of the total number of ballots cast. In Summit County, 276,296 votes were cast for president, resulting in the 8,289 being counted by hand. The votes represent 14 of the county's 475 precincts.

Elections Director Bryan Williams said that because the hand count matched certified results, the remaining 461 precincts will be counted by machine beginning at 8 a.m. today.

Hanna said she was concerned that observers weren't allowed to stand closer to the board employees doing the counting, to better observe. Hanna said she shared her concern with Deputy Director John Schmidt but was told the observers are not allowed to stand over the shoulders of the board employees. Hanna believes they had a legal right to stand close enough to see the ballots.

She said she will voice her concern to lawyers for the Green/Libertarian recount but did not know if any legal action would result.

The Portage County Board of Elections conducted its recount Tuesday. Elections Director Lois Enlow said the recount added one vote for Kerry from Brimfield Township's Precinct C.

Medina County held its recount Monday. The vote totals were unchanged, Elections Deputy Director Janet Pilat said.

Stark County's recount also was taking place Wednesday. Elections Director Jeff Matthews said 13 precincts were counted by hand, and the results did not change. The machine tabulation was expected to continue into the evening, he said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. who picked these counties? Awfully weird there are NO differences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 05:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. this is a joke.
so you run a bunch of ballots thru a machine that tells you the count is the same.

I just don't get how we are to get fraud out of that.

It's like having a change machine, you have say a bunch of quarters and dimes. you easily can go grab 3% of your pile in quarters, run them thru and see that you have quarters.

This is a bogus old law that was made to let the 3% come out on average,....who has access to the ballots before....thats where they are setting it up. DUH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrUnderhill Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Who has access?
Only people who can convince two Democrats that it's "OK".

If the election was stolen, there are a number of ways that it could (in theory) have been done. The one most often alleged lately (that the COUNTING machines are the culprits) would be adequately checked by randomly selecting 3%+ of ballots.

Variations between ACTUAL votes and what was counted would have to be spread pretty thin to avoid easy notice - there would likely be several miscounted votes in each precinct. If you hand-count dozens of precincts and they match the machine totals - you at least know that the machines are counting correctly. So if the election was stolen, it was done at another level.

We aren't at the point of knowing that yet, though we're getting closer. A handful of counties showing little/no change is possible in either situation.

We'll know more fairly soon I'd imagine. It's unlikely that ALL of the counties will be able to just count 3%, so we'll probably get at least a few total hand-counts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rjbny62 Donating Member (203 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. the recounting could be a red herring
it seems that whenever anyone tries to dig deeper into the polling books or other background information, it seems to raise the hackles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirandapriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Yes, if they can't look at the polling books
or dig deeper, I am afraid they won't find anything. I doubt Katherine Blackwell will let them go anywhere where they will find anything
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 05:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Hmmmmm
wonder what brand the machines were?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. Kerry Won Summit County.
Kerry 152,897 - 57%
* 116,184 - 43%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kuozzman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 05:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. How do we know he didn't win 64% to 36%????
This machine recount business is bullshit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. SO THE OBSERVERS COULDN'T SEE THE BALLOTS?
Hanna said she was concerned that observers weren't allowed to stand closer to the board employees doing the counting, to better observe. Hanna said she shared her concern with Deputy Director John Schmidt but was told the observers are not allowed to stand over the shoulders of the board employees. Hanna believes they had a legal right to stand close enough to see the ballots.

Oh yeah, babe. Completely fair. :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
9. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duncan Donating Member (498 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
11. I thought a rep from each concerned party
visually insepcted each and every ballot! WTF is up with that? I saw a news clip of a recount (in FLA?) once where there were atleast 2 people inspecting each ballot. This sounds illegal to me. Every thing I read about the "recount" so far sounds like the BOE is just covering its ass every step of the way with obstructions that sound illegal to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsascj Donating Member (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
12. No differences in all of these precincts?
I just don't believe it. A little TOO perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
13. Did they check for a cheat sheet on the wall somewhere?
Don't think they only tried that in one precinct!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC