Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's the 3+ million vote padding, Stupid!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:07 PM
Original message
It's the 3+ million vote padding, Stupid!
The most diabolical twist to their plan was the master stroke -- throw in the extra $3+ million. It would shut Kerry up. It would quiet the public. It would quiet the press. It would deem any minor infraction (i.e. mysteriously adding 3,000 + Bush votes in Ohio) insignificant in the big scheme of things.

And it is virtually unprovable, right?. Without a nationwide revote? Has anyone compiled evidence -- I suppose votes > registrants en masse? I've seen some isolated cases......

Evil incarnate. I say, let's hire some of them in 2008. Playing fair is not all its cracked up to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Exactly. We know it happened. Perfect proof -- b* 's approval
today at 49%. Hello ! We just have to prove. And trust me, we definitely will !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dlaliberte Donating Member (168 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Better than speculation, we have statistics
Edited on Thu Dec-16-04 08:30 PM by dlaliberte
The exit polls nationwide showed that Kerry should have won the popular vote. That is evidence that Bush probably (with a high degree of certainty) stole the election.

A statistical study is not, by itself, hard evidence, although in some cases, impossible odds make the outcome just as certain as hard evidence. With a weaker statistical result is should be enough to warrent further investigation to get the hard evidence. That is what Arnebeck is trying to do in Ohio, but given enough lawyers, we could do it in almost every state.

I'm not a lawyer, so I don't know the legal standing of statistics in courts. But as a scientist (of the CS variety) statistics are at the foundation of most of our scientific knowledge, and you can't break the laws of nature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. I estimate a minimum of 5.2 million votes in at lest 16 states
Proly more though 10 to 12 million votes in up to 23 states
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. WOW! I woke up this am thinking about PA. Do you think
that just let that one fall? Tell me how you came up with your estimate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quakerfriend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Yes, would love to hear how you came up with these #s
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. weeks ago I looked the exit polls and the states results
SOmeone here @ DU posted up a chart Showing a ---MArgin Of Error--

ANd how the odds that those 16 states could go for Bush were like astronomical---plus 23 states had a discrepancy of 2% or more--and there were about 112 million votes cast --Thats what they said at least
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Do I hear 25 Million?
Sold to the conspiracy theorist in the third row!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemis12 Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. My spreadsheet says 45 million votes stolen
in 64 states. It's PROOF I tell ya!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newscott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. Rove said it himself
He was hoping for about 4 million evangelicals to turn out for Bush.
Hmmmm..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Hmm. Interesting. Is that 4 million more than the regular voting
evangelicals? Interesting....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. i think he meant ANGELS
Edited on Thu Dec-16-04 08:37 PM by Faye
who would come down from heaven and cast invisible, magical, angelical votes

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Oh ya, I know they didn't REALLY vote. I just find the 4mill
number interesting. Like evil criminals have to leak something out - the number of true evangelicals plus the pad maybe equals 4 mill. They had to have thought about what they would say if they were asked about the big difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. LOL Funny ---but you may b VERY right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Uh angels from Lucifer maybe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-i-acs Donating Member (989 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
16. Here's how Turd Blossom engineered Chimpy's mandate:
Edited on Thu Dec-16-04 10:16 PM by Maine-i-acs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
17. You would only need half.
If you took half (say 1.7 million) and gave them to Kerry, we'd be tied. It had to be definitive -- so whatever Kerry was supposed to have been ahead, just add that many to *. If it was going to be as close as everybody thought -- like the polls said -- you wouldn't have to do that much fudging because no one EVER would have believed that * won by 10 million votes. 3 million, yes. He didn't, but you get what I'm saying.

Also, there's NO FRIGGIN' MANDATE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. duh - you only need half!! You're right! I think we should put
something together on this and blast it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seaclyr Donating Member (182 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
18. kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC