free republic DC on Cspan whining about the violent, violent protesters

[Skip Intro]

coming...the violent left wing....

they are whining that they can't secure the space they want at the inauguragion, that they need to give safe haven to the bushies from the violent, violent left wing protesters.

making it clear that these violent left wing people want to attack the navy memorial, which is where they'll be, btw, and that they will do all they can to protect the memorial from the troop-hating lefties.

hippocrite just stopped slandering the "left" long enough to brag that he was part of the protest outside the Gore's residence. I remember reading horror stories about those people.


oh, now we're professional anarchisits

what are these people on?

[LynnTheDem]

1. Do they include all the REPUBLICANS who oppose bush's bullshit invasion?

And all the REPUBLICANS who voted AGAINST bush?

Of course not.

[Gothmog]

2. They are projecting

If Kerry had won, they would be planning violent protests and therefore we must be doing the same. You can tell a great deal about what someone is afraid of.

[bettyellen]

3. same bullshit they said about the repug convention

ohmigosh, they had the whole city on lockdown for no good reason.
what nonsense.

[SnoopDog]

4. It is amazing,

They are *all* so ignorant....

[JMac]

5. LMFAO

They just panned the camera around the room and there were 4 people there.

[lonestarnot]

8. hehehehehehee LOL

[knowbody0]

6. proud anarkist here

hard to not get radical these days eh?

[lonestarnot]

7. saw the intro and as soon as they dogged the big dog I came back to

the dur board! They look alike don't they all but Tom Fenton President of Judicial Watch. What is judicial watch? Anyone know?

[Carolab]

16. Judicial Watch

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_Watch

[lonestarnot]

42. Tanks Carolab!

[McCamy Taylor]

9. sound like a bunch a wimps to me, these neo-conservatives...

...John Wayne and Barry Goldwater are probably rolling in their graves, dont know why "real men" like McCain associate with these crybabies.

[prodigal_green]

10. Well, there is evidence for this

after all, remember how violent the anti-war marches around the country were, or the half-million rioters in NYC during the RNC?

:eyes:

[bowens43]

11. The DC chapter is a particularly vile bunch of right wing nut jobs

They are also the biggest bunch of cowards I've ever met. They are so afraid of confrontation that if you even approach them in a non-threatening manner they whip out their cell phones and dial 911. If this bunch thought there was a chance of violence they would run away with their tails tucked between their legs.

[fearnobush]

12. They just helped the protests. If it bleeds it leads.

Just the news of violence will send the camera crews if thats what we want. We don't have to be violent at all, just the Freeps threat of it will send the news crews to air all that art and truth. Bring flowers all.

[Carolab]

17. So true

My fiance had this experience doing GOTV. He was approached by one of those Nathan Sproul creeps outside our neighborhood grocery store and he announced that he was working with MoveOn. This guy (in his 20s) turned and literally ran down the block, with my fiance (55) yelling after him "we've gonna kick your ass!". Hysterical.

[SueZhope]

13. what the hell country are they from those freepers?

Shut them up & send those freepers to the front line to go fight Bushes unjust war
NOW!!!:puke: :puke: :puke:

[bleever]

14. Looks like a heads up: they're shopping out the "violent lefties" story.

Which makes me suspicious that they might need to start some violence to blame on somebody.

Heads up!

[steelyboo]

15. If they are going to label us Radicals, lets start calling them

Reactionaries, as that is the exact opposite on the political spectrum as a Radical, and to me, sounds far worse. Plus, if it ever caught on, some of the sheeple who are too dumb to look something up might think 'radical' means cool! :) (hey, they bought that Bushilter was a "compassionate conservative", those idiots will fall for anything you tell them. so long as you appeal to that hatred they all seem to harbor deep inside.)

[Carolab]

20. Actually, I have seen Bush described

as a "radical". He IS. Radical implies "extremist". We are NOT extremists.

[steelyboo]

23. actually, in the classical political definitions, a Radical is someone so

Far to the left as to be past even Communism/Marxism, whereas a Reactionary was defined as someone even farther right than Fascism.
This page has a chart that shows it.

http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2003/6/14/45425/6208

[Carolab]

24. Thanks

we're still not radicals.

[steelyboo]

31. Oh, I wholeheartedly agree, but since they only understand name calling

and God knows if I can agitate a Rethug a day with something so simple as a silly label that don't mean shit in the long run, but gets under their skin, especially after you explain to the idiot that a reactionary sits to the right of HITLER, i.e. you make a NAZI seem like a good guy; well, then I might get to use my black belt, and since the election, I've been dying to break a freeper in half for therapy :P(kidding)

[Chimpanzee]

39. I'm just a concerned American

We are pro-democracy. The freepers are pro-republican.

[Carolab]

19. Time to document

all of the violent actions they have staged. Stealing signs, keying cars, burning crosses, Brooks Brothers riots, etc. Pots calling the kettle black.

[Pithy Cherub]

18. The massive protests at their terror convention in New York is burned

into their collective brain cell. They have a sign up sheet for who gets to use it on which day...

[GetTheRightVote]

21. Now, Now, don't be to hard on them, they are all crazy anyhow

[Pithy Cherub]

28. Let * use them for his mental health initiatives.

Can't be too hard on people who have shown they are beyond trusting...
:)

[rumpel]

22. Saw a little of it, had to change channel! They said: to protect the Bush

supporters. Please.
I did not know that liberals are violent and destructive, but notice the difference in attendance of the 2 press conferences?

[txindy]

25. What are they doing on television?

Why aren't they in Iraq? They keep claiming that they'd go if their Dear Leader called on them to go, but surely they've seen the news on Faux and know about the troop shortage. Surely they've seen the Faux news about the Mosul attack and understand that Dear Leader is too shy to ask his loyal goose-steppers to march to Iraq.

If those guys were REAL republicans, they'd be in boot camp, right now. Protect democracy! Enlist!

[leftynyc]

38. Somebody should have given the 6 maggots that were

at this press conference recruitment papers while the cameras were rolling. It would have been amusing to see them lose control of their bladders.

[Carolab]

26. First of all, why do they fear us?

Is it because they know that we are right? Why else would we be angry? And of course, we are. Do we also fear them? If so, then we are in a spiral of fear, pitted one against the other. In such a situation, one side must decide to remain rational and calm in order to keep the peace. If we take the "high road", and direct our fear and our anger constructively, we stand to gain.

I like the advice of a pastor who is a close acquaintance of a friend of mine, who wrote:

We know that the first thing to do in a situation of fear is, as a leader, to model calm resolution, and be as unflappable as possible. Vibrations of fear can tear apart a congregation or a nation, so our first order of business is to be steady and calm, thereby both avoiding yet more fearful vibration, and opening folks to some possible hopeful alternatives.

Our best bet as Progressives will, as it seems to me, to be “centered” within ourselves, and focused on the calm peacefulness that we want to prevail in this situation. That is not a Pollyanna approach, but realism about how to cope with fear. It’s a very demanding realism that is difficult to approximate, much less achieve. But the alternative is worse, for then fear conquers us and destroys us. We have to turn our realistic fear into constructive action, and move steadily forward toward the kind of nation we envision for ourselves, our neighbors, and for the grandchildren of us all. Sure, we could fail. But not to try at all is to make failure inevitable and fear our fate.

[rman]

34. they've been told we hate them

and they listen only to people who tell m that. darn liberal media.

[rumpel]

27. We should embarass the paranoid right, by proving the protesters

are peace marchers, always were....

[NVMojo]

29. if this was an honest election ....why are they afraid???

[mod mom]

30. funny, but we weren't the hawks who wanted to go to war,

we weren't the racists who suppressed the vote, we weren't the crooks who stole the election. We are the patriots defending what our forefathers sacrificed for: DEMOCRACY!

[colonel odis]

32. they feel free to hang the "violent" tag on democrats because they know

that democrats aren't the violent types. they know they can push and push and say things about us and we fight back by maintaining our dignity, something they don't understand.

here's what i think democrats/protesters should do. when there's a confrontation like that, grab some freepers and rip their clothes off of them.

don't punch them. don't kick their teeth in or shatter their kneecaps, much as it would be justified. just tear their clothes off of them. send them running naked or in their underwear back to their side of the picket line.

nothing would humiliate them as much or make them look as silly when they're standing before the cameras whining about how awful we are.

it's one thing to stand before the eager news reporter showing off your bloody nose and black eye. but standing there naked, with your flabby, pink manteats for all the world to see, makes you look like a great big weirdo.

:-)

[Chimpanzee]

41. Or if you expose their 1 inch willie - how hilarious!!!!!!!!!!

[mzmolly]

33. Violent? Were not the ones dropping bombs on brown people "just because"

F-them.

[genieroze]

35. If there were a drug called hypocrisy, they would be addicts. eom

[mattclearing]

36. Let him come down to DC.

We will show those nutty freepers the definition of hospitality.

One egg at a time.

[genieroze]

37. Eggs cost $, the finger is free. eom

[progressoid]

40. I had to quit watching. I lost track of how many times he said

liberal and left-wing with that sneer in his voice. But it was funny that there was almost no one from the press there. tehehehe.