Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scripps Howard: "In Ohio 1 in 50 votes for president don't count"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
EMunster Donating Member (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 05:26 PM
Original message
Scripps Howard: "In Ohio 1 in 50 votes for president don't count"

In Ohio, almost 1 in 50 votes for president don't count

By MICHAEL COLLINS
Scripps Howard News Service
December 22, 2004

- Here's something that has been largely overlooked amid all of the complaints about voting irregularities in Ohio during the Nov. 2 election:

Nearly 97,000 ballots, or 1.7 percent of those cast across the state, either did not record a preference for president or could not be counted because the voter selected more than one presidential candidate.

An analysis by Scripps Howard News Service found that Ohio recorded the second-highest number of missing votes in the country, behind California. Elections experts say a large number of missing votes in a high-profile race like president should raise a red flag that something may be amiss.

Secretary of State Ken Blackwell said it's difficult to know what happened because the numbers don't include a breakdown of how many voters simply chose not to vote for president or how many picked more than one presidential candidate.

But he said the data reinforces his belief that the state must move away from punch-card ballots and toward electronic machines that prevent voters from picking more than one candidate in the same race.

Voters in 68 of Ohio's 88 counties used punch-card ballots in November. Electronic voting machinery must be in place in every county in Ohio by May 2006.

On the other hand, Blackwell said, some voters probably chose not to vote for president because they didn't like either of the major candidates on the ballot.

"Given human nature, when you're talking about 5.8 million people casting a vote, it wouldn't be too far-fetched to think that you have a small percentage of people who would say, 'A pox on both of your houses,' " Blackwell said.


more:
http://www.knoxstudio.com/shns/story.cfm?pk=MISCOUNT-OHIO-12-22-04&cat=AN


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh SURE Ken
On the other hand, Blackwell said, some voters probably chose not to vote for president because they didn't like either of the major candidates on the ballot.

"Given human nature, when you're talking about 5.8 million people casting a vote, it wouldn't be too far-fetched to think that you have a small percentage of people who would say, 'A pox on both of your houses,' " Blackwell said.

ONLY IN OHIO???????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The percentage is pretty standard.
For whatever reason, that's about the percentage. Hasn't changed markedly over time. Some don't vote because they don't want to; some screwed up when they voted; some voted for two candidates (most probable problem--look at how electronic voting tends to have lower spoilage rates when it's set up to check for overvotes). And in some cases they may have voted for "disqualified". Even with lever-machines in western New York we had undervotes: friends of local candidates would come out and vote for him/her, but otherwise bail.

I almost didn't successfully punch through the chad for most of the races the first time I voted in Calif. Got to the last couple of measures/candidates, and realized the stylus went in much farther than it had been going. Looked at the punch card: only two holes. So I put the card back in and proceeded to actually vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
righteous1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. True, actually the figure in 2004 is 93,000, it
was 97,000 in 2000 on significantly less voters. The best estimates I have heard are that ~ 8% of the votes might have a discernable presidential vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. As IF 2000 was a clean comparison
Come on, that election was a mess too.

WE NEED TO COUNT ALL OF THESE BALLOTS BY HAND. Everything else is just conjecture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
righteous1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Ohio was dirty in 2000? Had not heard that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Both types of punch card machines have bad chad spots
There are braces that obstruct certain ballot positions resulting in chad buildup that blocks the stylus from completing a punch.

See:
http://www.cs.uiowa.edu/~jones/cards/chad.html#chadjam




Looking into this, I disassembled a Votomatic voting machine made by Computer Election Systems Incorporated, and found that it has a horizontal steel brace across the back of the mechanism. This brace is behind punch positions 4 and 5 (assigned, respectively, to Pat Buchanan and Al Gore on the now infamous Palm Beach County butterfly ballot). As a result, while there was room for a huge volume of chad behind the other punch positions, probably more than the 50,000 pieces quoted, it seemed that it might be possible to block these positions after only a few hundred votes! This could explain the complaints from voters about their need to repeatedly force the voting stylus before it would punch through the card.


snip

Positions of obstructions inside the Votomatic (top) and Data Punch (bottom) mechanisms, relative to a 228 position ballot








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. A POX ON BLACKWELL
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. On the other hand, he's turning into a kind of Dick...
...Cheney comedian, sort of...I mean, consider...


"(Blackwell) said the data reinforces his belief that the state must move away from punch-card ballots and toward electronic machines that prevent voters from picking more than one candidate in the same race."

--ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, electronic... ha, ha, ha, ha, I'm on the floor dying here, stop! stop!.... ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha.... machines...

--what he really meant to say was, "electronic machines that prevent voters from picking the WRONG candidate."

And this...

"'Given human nature, when you're talking about 5.8 million people casting a vote, it wouldn't be too far-fetched to think that you have a small percentage of people who would say, 'A pox on both of your houses,' ' Blackwell said."

--ha, ha, ha some more...

--but nope, what they said was "a pox on YOUR house, Mr. Blackwell" --and it was quite the slambang percentage that said it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. God I hate my state of Ohio some days
If my family weren't here...I swear that is the only thing holding us back.

Oh well then Kathie Blackwell, maybe one of the selections on the new eLIEtronic machines should be "a pox on both your houses". I am sure you can get someone to swing those to the Republican candidate.

GET ME OUT OF HERE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC