Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question about possible Rove-Blackwell contact election day

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 05:51 PM
Original message
Question about possible Rove-Blackwell contact election day
Edited on Wed Dec-29-04 05:55 PM by McCamy Taylor
I seem to recall reading something about a White House plane being seen in Ohio on election day or election eve. I know I have read denials that Rove had any contact with Blackwell on those days.

I hate to start another thread if there is already one can someone direct me to it and I will delete this one.

I have been wondering since election morning who told Blackwell to try to keep exit pollsters away from polling places in Ohio and when the decision was made and how the order was given to him. Did it come straight from Rove in advance or was it a last minute decision made when it became apparent that the election was not going to be close and that there would be a noticeable exit poll/vote tally discrepancy. Attempting to block exit polls was a BIG RISK. It certainly caught my eye on election morning. It was like waving a big red flag that said

ELECTION THEFT IN PROGRESS IN OHIO :wtf:

The fact that Blackwell tried to hinder the exit pollsters was the number one reason why I began sending letters to Congresspeople the very next day.

Anyway, I have been wondering if Rove or a trusted underling was dispatched to Ohio to tell Blackwell that Operation Stop Those Exit Polls was going to have to be implemented, even if it meant taking a chance that the press would notice that something wierd was going on. It isnt the kind of thing you would want to send by email or over the phone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Absolute Truth Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm obviously being dense here, but....
...what would be the benefit for the GOP to stop EXIT polls.

I understand voter suppression (fewer booths in black districts and other even dirtier tricks). By why would Rove or anyone else care about exit polls. They don't really mean anything in the final analysis, after all.

AT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The exit polls
were showing Kerry won, and won big, that's why
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. to discredit them and so they would not be used in future election thefts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. ?? I had never heard of exit polls being hindered????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
s-cubed Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. The Nevada Secretary of State told me he did not allow exit
polls. I don't know what he did to prevent them, or if it mattered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Wow. That is strange, huh? But interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
17. ...and tie that in with the fact that the asshole has never corrected
even one media source on the fact that Nevada did NOT have statewide Sequoias with printers ....you think he might be honest?? NOT!!! This asshole has been pushing the machines like there was no tomorrow and yet never tried to find a way to get rid of the ten year old Sequoias in Vegas that can't prove individual votes ...only totals in a recount ...that's why the jerk kept the pollsters away ...they rigged parts of the election in Nevada but no one gives a shit.

http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2004/Oct-20-Wed-2004/news/25041510.html

in his mind, election polling screwed up the 2000 election yet ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
s-cubed Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. The Nevada Secretary of State told me he did not allow exit
polls. I don't know what he did to prevent them, or if it mattered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
s-cubed Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. The Nevada Secretary of State told me he did not allow exit
polls. I don't know what he did to prevent them, or if it mattered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
34. MSM sued Blackwell for restricting exit pollers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoWantsToBeOccupied Donating Member (413 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Blackwell denied meeting Bush
I'm virtually certain I watched Keith Olbermann ask Kenneth Blackwell whether he had met Bush on Election Day, and Blackwell denied meeting Bush that day. This was a few weeks back when Blackwell was a guest on "Countdown." (I was confused by Keith's question because I thought I had read that they had met the day before the election. I also wished Keith had broadened his question to include all of Bush's White House aides.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #5
20. Keyword is "on Election Day." Perhaps at 11 pm the night before ...
Sometimes how the question is phrased is a great gift to the obfuscator. A good reporter would have asked, "When did you meet with Bush, Rove, or other campaign officials on or just before Election Day?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreepFryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. Here's the info:
Nov. 2 (Election Day):
"Air Force One landed in Columbus about 11:30 a.m., delivering the president straight from Crawford, Texas, where he had cast his vote earlier. The president's motorcade immediately headed for the Bush-Cheney campaign headquarters at 580 S. High St., where Bush thanked the staff and volunteers for their hard work and encouraged them to get out the vote throughout the day."

from http://columbusdispatch.com/election/election-local.php?story=dispatch/2004/11/02/vote.html

If i recall correctly, Olbermann asked if Blackwell met with Bush on Election Day in his capacity as SoS of the election, which Blackwell denied. He did not specifically deny meeting with Bush in his capacity as campaign mgr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenmutha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Hi Freep Fryer!
Welcome to DU! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Not really concerned that Bush gave him any orders, Bush is too dumb to
orchestrate anything.

The attempt to hinder exit pollsters in the state of Ohio occured in the early morning hours of election day and was over almost as soon as it started because the networks got restraining orders...they do not take that kind of thing lying down.

I have wondered why more people dont mention this, because this is the single most suspicious thing that Blackwell has done in my opinion. It got wide press on election morning, because all the newspeople were major pissed off about it, but afterwards they all develeoped collective amnesia about it...just about the same time they developed amnesia about the exit poll results.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sepia_steel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #7
19. WWWWWWWTTTTTTTTTTTTFFFFFFFFFFF??????????
Edited on Thu Dec-30-04 02:17 AM by sepia_steel
I forgot all about that!!!! There is NO FUCKING WAY that Bush/Rove and Blackwell didn't speak that day. PLEASE.

The more I'm reminded, the more obvious it is and the more pissed off I am. This just fucking reeks to high heaven!!! But 80% of us find this perfectly above suspicion?

WTF?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
euler Donating Member (515 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. We seem to be surmising that they spoke.
I'll simply assume that they did speak. If we don't know what was said between them, how does this help us ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
25. What's with that link you posted?
I keeps crashing my computer and my compter rarely gets hung up on anything.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreepFryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. No clue...
try a diff browser, clear yer cache, change yer JavaScript properties, bla bla bla! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Last Lemming Donating Member (806 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
13. And the fat man
I think this is actually an interesting episode that few people have talked about Bush flew all the way from Texas to Ohio on election day to wave to his supporters? Actually, I read that some supporters showed up at this "campaign rally" only to watch him get out of the limo, go into a building and then come out again a half an hour later

Bush at the scene--could they be so stupid as to have POTUS put the fix in--in person? I think they may have--

Bush is mentioned specifically in Arnebacks suit re: election fraud--he's being subpoena'd--or they've tried anyway--

Was a fat man at the meeting? (In my dreams he wears a wire)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. In my dreams
he sits at a laptop in the Old Family Dining Room with a spreadsheet or Access database and a modem. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Last Lemming Donating Member (806 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. wrong fat man
Edited on Thu Dec-30-04 01:22 AM by Last Lemming
for my particular fantasy

There was a big fat guy--picture floating around one of the message boards before the election. He was billed as a "may or may not be a team player--republican asset" sort of guy I don't know why I remember him--he worked with Blackwell--how closely is anyone's guys

I know someone could have been standing somewhere in that building Bush visited on election day and if he was wearing a wire then Kerry will be president

These guys--I mean Kerry et al-- haven't shown us any of what evidence they've got All they've cited is a deposition by someone reporting on a post election event
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Ah So
I like mine, but I hope yours comes true, too.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. Yeah, I read that too. Supporters said he just wisked by, did not talk
to them. My (paranoid) guess is he (or someone on Air Force One) dropped by in person to hand off some sort of 'payment' or 'cash' as gratitude for the 'deed to be done' that day...that he did NOT want lost in the 'mail' or otherwise documented. Plus an in-person, last-minute hand-shake to those 'doing his deed' ensured it would be done, as promised.

The Ohio lay-over was suspiciously short...and certainly NOT to impress last-minute voters...since he seemed to rush by them. And after all, he didn't really NEED their actual votes.

I keep hoping that someone had some sort a 'camera' or 'surveillance' recording the hand-off. But that's just my hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Machiavelli05 Donating Member (335 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
21. I must say...
I dont like the fact that the head of elections in Ohio and the campaign manager for B/C in Ohio is the same person.

However, any fraud that results from this will be difficult to prove... unless the Head of elections for OH (SoS) wrote any letters to the Camp Man for B/C in OH... ;) Then he'd just be a certifiable nutcase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IStriker Donating Member (408 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #21
38. But it's not even a little bit unusual. Rendell in PA...
ran Kerry's campaign and made all these strange rulings about sending people to polls that worked for him (stuff that had never been done for an election in PA and set a lot of people's suspicions off especially since any Democrat from Philly is pretty much assumed to be involved with election fraud.) We don't really have someone comparable to Sec. of State position. There is some appointed board that sets parameters and the elected people in each county run elections under the Governor's instructions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quakerfriend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
22. There was some video of his visit to OH
He was in the campaign HQ thanking folks. I can't remember where I saw this! I know it was on cable though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quakerfriend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
23. I just remember him making some stupid joke
and looking at him and thinking: He looks so tired, face all red and blotchy......why go to OH.......when you can take a rest now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Not a Sheep Donating Member (199 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
24. Let's get serious...
Assuming Blackwell was following various orders from Rove, do you really think Rove is stupid enough to meet with him on election day?

Assuming there was a plan to commit fraud or to deter voting for Kerry, Rove would not have had to meet face to face with Blackwell at the 11th hour.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rjbny62 Donating Member (203 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. excellent point
it doesn't seem reasonable that he would have waited until the last hour
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KerryOn Donating Member (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
27. Bush, Blackwell and Damschroder Did Meet!
... acording to the Free Press. I new I had read it some where, just took me forever to find it. It may have also ben covered on a AP story.

Sources close to the Board of Elections told the Free Press that Damschroder and Ohio’s Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell met with President George W. Bush in Columbus on Election Day. The idea was to discourage turnout in Democratic wards by forcing voters to wait in long lines at the polling places.

http://www.freepress.org/departments/display/19/2004/972

Here is a U thread that has a little on it as well:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x95767

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Two words:
Criminal Conspiracy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
righteous1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. "Sources close to the BOE" told.... cmon
think we can get a bit more substantive. If it happened it ought to be quite easy to verify and prove, without relying on heresay from a nobody as your main sustantiation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KerryOn Donating Member (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. Agreed because as I said: "According to the Free Press" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
righteous1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #33
40. I was actually directing my comments to FP article rather than you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #33
41. One of many good reasons to put Blackwell under oath for a deposition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IStriker Donating Member (408 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
31. I'm finally going to go out on a limb and ask my DUMB question...
that I have resisted asking since election day. What on earth do exit polls have to do with the outcome of the election? Four years ago, the networks couldn't use them because they were screwy and did not predict the outcome. I read someplace that pollsters admitted to polling too many women this time and that Republicans admitted to lying to the pollsters just to screw up the polls, so why are people basing their belief that there must have been fraud if the results of the election didn't match them? Some American company did the exit polling for the recall election in Venezuela and their results were badly off too. Why is this being used to try to prove fraud? I just don't understand. Can someone please help?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
righteous1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. That is not a dumb questions, there is
a lot of validity in what you ask. Some of the exit polls were extremely skewed ie Kerry +12% in PA. There was not a poll in 6 months that showed even half that lead in PA for JK. There were some serious problems with the proceedure and models used to be that far off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IStriker Donating Member (408 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. That's what I fail to understand. How can this be used as proof...
that fraud occurred? Not only does exit polling not match the voting, but it doesn't match the previous polling done either. I think I heard that the exit polls showed Kerry +19% in PA at some point in the early evening. Other states mostly in the south had Kerry up in exit polling when he had never been anything but so far behind he didn't bother to campaign in them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. good points and questions
but the exit polls are still not to be entirely discounted either, or why would the media companies spend so much money for them?

Keep in mind that pre-election polls did not poll cell phone users as far as I know, nor new voters, so may have been skewed by that alone.

Also, the "polled too many women" excuse doesn't work when they have the polls broken down by male/female already.

Finally, altough the polls are not the end-all be-all of info that some think they are, they are used as one indicator of fraud - if the polls are blocked, there is one fewer indicator (and in some precincts, the only indicator) if there was monkey business.

Hope this helped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Last Lemming Donating Member (806 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #31
43. As I understand it
exit polls are very accurate and have been used for years to cue early election night reporting Come year 2000, exit polls didn't seem to work as well--they kept favoring Democrats like Gore when the "real" winner is Bush--

Note--they get revised in real time and this revision can be very interesting in and of itself---I heard a news analyst commenting about the sampling problems--he said they had to go back and recalculate because "it seemed they had overestimated the number of minority voters--this of course is what vote supression and targetted vote manipulation is all about

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IStriker Donating Member (408 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Wasn't the exit polling always done for years up until 2000...
by Voter News Service the consortium of the networks plus CNN (or something like that)from at least the '70's on, and beginning in 2000 where it has been inaccurate ever since has been done by some other new group? How do we know this new group isn't the problem? I don't know if this is the same group who screwed up the exit polling for the Venezuelan recall or if it was a different American group that was involved, but they were certainly wrong or else there was voter fraud there too. I understand what you are saying but it strikes me that the only poll that counts is the one on election day where people actually go and do it. They either wait in line or they leave and say it's not important enough for me to stand here; they either show up or they don't; and until the actual vote is in and counted all other polls are "guesstimates."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreepFryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
37. kick
Edited on Thu Dec-30-04 04:18 PM by FreepFryer
and refocus - the topic isn't the accuracy of exit polls, it's what meetings took place between one half of blackwell's mind (the SoS part) and the other half (the Campaign Manager part).

In other words, whether there was improper conduct, interference or influence by one party (the GOP) on the OH election.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Last Lemming Donating Member (806 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. Abso--f*ing--lutely
Someone above wrote: Assuming Blackwell was following various orders from Rove, do you really think Rove is stupid enough to meet with him on election day?

Maybe Rove isn't so stupid but it may not be a stretch for Bush--Even so--Can you imagine how stupid it could be to send the POTUS to put the fix in ON ELECTION DAY!! But that may be what happens when you aren't reality based--and haven't had to be reality based for a long time--maybe if you have been getting away with murder for years, you think you can send the president of the United States as bag man on an election fixing scheme

I remember long ago when they nailed Spiro Agnew, Nixon's VP --Some guy testified that he walked out of an office shaking because he had just handed over $20,000 cash to the Vice President of the United States (who stuffed it in a drawer)

A friend of mine from Eastern Europe doesn't know American electoral process--I remarked to him that a campaign stop by the president on election day was very unusual and not really proper protocol--but it wasn't a campaign stop

The Big Question remains: Why would BUSH have to go to Columbus--why not Rove, or other little Rovettes go? And was Blackwell there? If someone can pin Blackwell in that building when Bush was there then you've got one very important question to ask KBlackwell on his deposition Why on TV did you lie about whether you met Bush on election day?

Are there still investigative reporters that find these things out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 03:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC