Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT (AP) 12/31 "Candidates Want a Second Recount"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
EMunster Donating Member (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 01:40 AM
Original message
NYT (AP) 12/31 "Candidates Want a Second Recount"
Respectful...


By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Published: December 31, 2004

Filed at 12:08 a.m. ET

COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) -- Two third-party presidential candidates asked a federal court Thursday to force a second recount of the Ohio vote, alleging county election boards altered votes and didn't follow proper procedures in the recount that ended this week.

Lawyers for Green Party candidate David Cobb and the Libertarian Party's Michael Badnarik made their request in federal court in Columbus.

(snip)

`We've documented in this filing how this recount was not conducted in accordance with uniform standards throughout Ohio'' as required by the U.S. Constitution, said John Bonifaz, a lawyer from the National Voting Right Institute representing the candidates.

Ohio law requires an elections board to manually recount a randomly selected 3 percent of ballots. If the totals match certified results for those precincts, all the county's votes are then machine-counted. If the hand count is off, a county must manually recount all its ballots.

The filing, part of an ongoing lawsuit originally brought by a county board of elections to stop the recount, alleges counties did not randomly select precincts for the manual recount and some workers altered votes to prevent a full hand count.



http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Ohio-Vote.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Chili Donating Member (832 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. *applause*
This recount was irrelevant, and I'm so glad they're forcing the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thanatonautos Donating Member (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. Excellent. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 03:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. WOW!!! This is a good thing!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 03:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. Nice. "We asked/paid for a real recount. May we have it please?"
It's what the law stipulates as proof of fairness.

Pretty simple.

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jkd Donating Member (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 03:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. Way to go! Cobb and Barnarik
If 3% of the precincts in each county were truly selected randomly, it's likely that any fraud that took place would be detected. These two candidates are great. They are putting the pressure where it should be. They deserve our support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pauldp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 04:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. A kick for Cobb & Badnarik
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 04:20 AM
Response to Original message
7. Do it right the first time...
Didn't I learn that in kindergarten?

What Are They Hiding?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 04:23 AM
Response to Original message
8. Fraudulent Recount of a Fraudulent Election
Just keep rackin' up the felonies you fucking punks.

We're all looking forward to the forthcoming mug-shots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC