Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What would the electoral vote be if all states divided them proportionally

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
bobweaver Donating Member (953 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 02:45 PM
Original message
What would the electoral vote be if all states divided them proportionally
Edited on Tue Jan-04-05 02:46 PM by bobweaver
instead of winner-take-all? What would the electoral vote totals be in that hypothetical case?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Do you want to assume the numbers are accurate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobweaver Donating Member (953 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Knowing that they are NOT accurate, but they are all we have, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Since the Bush won the pop vote by a decent margin
I suppose it won't make much difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Bush STOLE the pop vote by a decent margin (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. LOL! Good point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
righteous1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Now that is an excellent question n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. I believe that's how it should work anyway
Each state should put up the slate of electoral votes based upon a percentage of the popular vote in the state with the extra two electoral votes going to whichever person takes the most votes in the election.

Unfortunately, under the constitution that would require fifty seperate eefforts in fifty seperate states and very few states are going to be willing to forgo electoral strength for fairness, thus the only way to accomplish this would be via amendment and the politicians in Washington simply will not do that.

Under that scenario, Bush still would ahve won in 2004, but would have lost in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemis12 Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Should be much like the popular vote
51%-48% Bush

Approx 274 EV's for Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. small state bonus always puts Bush over the top - if electorial votes
are also allocated based on total pop vote without looking at per state numbers it becomes a simple win the popular vote game.

Actually in the standard Electorial vote game, the GOP winning really big the small states could end up giving the Dems an edge in the standard Electorial vote game if the Dems come in second in pop vote but get a small winning split in the large states. But that is just the effect of concentrated vote losing.

I suspect this possibility is deminished with proportional allocation

I believe proportional would make it harder to overcome the small state bonus, and may well make it harder for the pop vote loser to win the electorial vote - but in the end I believe the concentration thing still screws up the result in a win a state contest.

But someone should run the numbers!

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
righteous1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. What will be interesting is when a certain amount of states go to the
Edited on Tue Jan-04-05 03:42 PM by righteous1
proportional allocation and the rest stay as is. Man the possible scenarios will be mind boggling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC