NC Committee to Improve Voting Laws/Machines now

[SaveAmerica]

Listen here, meeting is already in progress. Has anyone been listening and know if Chuck Herrin has already spoken?


http://www.ncvoter.net/alerts.html

[SaveAmerica]

1. Kicking, the meeting is still going on...

Very excellent discussion about NC's efforts to clear up voting problems.

[SaveAmerica]

2. Chuck Herrin pro. hacker speaking now

[seabeyond]

3. awfully fast, dont know if they have the true issues

might make sure not jsut a bandaide. i am feeling a lot is going to be pushed thru to say see we did it, yet covering their ass to cheat and not really fixing anything just feeding the animals

[SaveAmerica]

4. It's one of a series of meetings to decide best methods of

voting before new laws are made

[marions ghost]

5. can somebody report on this?

...if progress is made it might be a way for other states to go.

We should stay on top of this kind of thing.
thanks saveamerica

[SaveAmerica]

8. You're welcome...

David Allen is on the committee, he posts here as plan9_pub. I think he'd be the best contact for information on what the results are.

[Blue Pomegranate]

6. Thank you for the link.

Listening now in NC. Chuck is doing a wonderful job explaining the dangers of electronic voting.

[SaveAmerica]

7. "Sky is falling mentality about computers"

I don't think that person was listening to Chuck's presentation. I hope someone is filming Chuck because I think what he's saying could be the best form of education for anyone who doubts the fraud.

[Blue Pomegranate]

9. I agree that his speech would be a great educational tool.

They are breaking for lunch until 1:35. But audio is still on and you can hear someone discussing with Chuck how the senatorial and Presidental races in NC did not follow early voting patterns while all other races did.

[SaveAmerica]

10. I took a break too,

just came back and thought that I hope they realize the mike is live, what did they say?

[Blue Pomegranate]

12. I think they got started late.

Very interesting, most in support of paper ballots or a verification system. The only arguments against related to efficiency and speed, but I thought there were some good rebuttals on those points about a quicker/cheaper count should not be conducted at the expense of voting integrity.

[Wilms]

11. Very good news. n/t

[Bill Bored]

13. Chuck is the MAN!! And plan9 too? We can't lose!

And when it's over, see this thread:
<http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x264034>

[marions ghost]

14. thank Chuck Herrin

We should recognize everybody who sticks their neck out for this cause. I think Chuck is doing a great job. He is a computer security expert who knows what he is talking about. www.chuckherrin.com