Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My letter to Senator Kerry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 01:31 PM
Original message
My letter to Senator Kerry
I agree with the recent post by planetc, which praised Senator Kerry, and in fact I wrote a very similar post a couple weeks ago. However, I feel that it is not inconsistent to admire someone greatly and yet strongly disagree with them.

I am posting this letter that I wrote yesterday to Senator Kerry, in response to a form letter from him about the importance of "election reform", expressing my disagreement with the way he has chosen not to be highly visible in his objections to this election. The reason I am posting this is that I thought that it might contain some ideas that some of you might wish to use in writing similar letters to Congress, or for use in arguments with your friends about why our efforts on this issue are so important. Here is my letter:


Dear Senator Kerry,

Your services to our country have earned you the ever-lasting gratitude of your fellow citizens, and I mean that with all my heart. As someone who vigorously supported your efforts to be elected President, I and millions of other Americans were bitterly disappointed by your "defeat."

However, I strongly believe that you made a grievous mistake by your decision to concede the 2004 election and not publicly fight to "have all the votes counted", as your running mate said shortly before you conceded. I say this now, because it is possible that it may yet not be too late for you to correct this mistake. Here is why I say this:

In my opinion, the evidence is very strong that you won this election, by carrying Ohio, and the popular nation-wide vote too, and that the election was stolen from you by a vast election fraud conspiracy. If I and hundreds of thousands of others are correct in this belief, then the failure to correct this problem will constitute the end of our democracy.

Your decision to not publicly fight this (regardless of what you may have done behind the scenes) has resulted in a virtually complete lack of news media coverage of this issue. Consequently, the good majority of Americans do not understand the problem. Therefore, there is little public pressure on Congress to fix the problem. And as you well know, without a tremendous amount of public pressure, this President and this Congress are not going to be interested in fixing this problem. Therefore, the Democrats will lose more seats in Congress in 2006 and 2008, and again fail to win the Presidency. With an even further right wing Congress, there will be even less interest in fixing the problem, etc., etc., etc., and we have a vicious cycle, with no evident means of breaking it -- at least not in our or our children's life time.

I understand that you believe that massive fraud was not required to defeat your bid for the Presidency. Here is why you should not believe that:

As I think you are aware, exit polls showed you winning both the electoral and the popular vote by comfortable margins, and there was a large discrepancy between the exit polls and the official vote count. It is very important to consider this issue carefully, among other reasons because in some countries (such as the Ukraine) exit polls serve the very important purpose of assuring a fair election.

There are only three possible reasons for a discrepancy between an election exit poll and an official vote count:
A. Random error, or chance.
B. Exit poll inaccuracy, or bias.
C. Faulty integrity of the election.
Let's consider the likelihood of each of these three possibilities:

Random error:

1. You won the Ohio exit poll by 4.2%, a difference of 6.7% from the official results. The odds against this happening by chance are 1,000 to one.

2. You won the national exit poll by 2.6%, a difference of 5.4% from official tally. The odds against this happening by chance are nearly a million to 1. (See Jonathon Simon’s report).

3. In 18 states, the discrepancy between the official vote and the exit poll was outside of the margin of error. All were in favor of Bush.

4. In 6 of the 11 major swing states, the discrepancy was outside of the margin of error, all in favor of Bush. The odds against the total discrepancy in these states alone exceeds 25 million to 1.

Conclusion: Random error is effectively ruled out as a cause of the discrepancy between the exit polls and the official vote tally.


Exit poll inaccuracy, or bias:

I highly recommend Dr. Steven Freeman’s excellent discussion of this issue. He brings up numerous reasons why exit polls, especially as conducted by experienced pollsters, are likely to be more accurate than official vote tallies. I will just mention a couple of salient points here:

1. Exit polls conducted by experienced pollsters are rarely or never off by the 5.4% margin noted above, except when massive fraud takes place.

2. Although numerous theories have been put forth to explain why the exit polls were not accurate in this election, most have been disproved, and those that haven’t been disproved are supported by no evidence other than the fact that the exit polls disagree with the official vote tally.


Faulty election integrity:

Having indicated why the first two possibilities are unlikely, let’s consider the likelihood that massive election fraud could have accounted for your defeat:

1. Numerous reports of compromised election integrity noted in Rep. Conyers’ report, including a computer programmer who testified that he was asked to (and did) write a computer program in Florida to switch votes from Kerry to Bush.

2. Secret computer software, under the control of Republican operatives, to count our votes.

3. Every effort made by Secretary of State Blackwell to obstruct a complete recount of the Ohio vote.

4. You yourself were several months ago caught on tape saying something like “These are the crookedest bunch of …” I for one was glad to hear you say that. But if that’s what you think, why would you think that stealing an election is beneath their honor?


To me and numerous others, the logic is inescapable, and we hope that you will agree with it. Now that the election has been formally challenged in the House and the Senate, maybe there is a second chance to reverse the problems that your silence up to this point has caused. I hope and pray that you will reconsider your position on this matter and join with us in an effort to save our democracy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nice Job!
You would get a gold star (if I had one to give). For JK :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abbiehoff Donating Member (356 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. I believe Kerry is going to continue to investigate.
Maybe only because I need to believe. Two months is not a lot of time to do a thorough and complete investigation of what happened on November 2. The whole story may be months, even years, getting out, but I trust John Kerry to get the story out. When (not if) there is actual, concrete proof of massive fraud, the MSM and the sheeple will have to listen. I know that this will happen, because it has to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I agree with many of your points, but here's what I'm worried about
Yes, if there is a complete investigation I feel confident that Kerry will win. But they are putting up numerous barriers to a complete investigation. I question whether a complete investigation will ever be done, despite the efforts of thousands of us to get one. And I believe that our best chance, perhaps our only chance, to get a complete investigation is to get massive public pressure to bear on this issue. The more people who know about this, the more likely that is to happen. The Democratic leadership needs to be more assertive in making this public, I believe, in order to allow that public pressure to be brought to bear on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rsmith6621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yawwwwwwwwwwn!!!!!


Face it......Its over........

Boxer should be nominated for President in 2008.....she is the only Senator who really has balls. If your DEM US Senator did not stand get rid of them.

What a shame.....74-1 where the hell was the other 25 Senators????..Golfing?????....how many of those twenty five were DEMs.

We who supported Kerry need to move on and fight our battle in the streets and figure out a way to get the media off their butts and notice us. If Kerry would have really cared yesterday he would not have been speaking to the troops in Iraq he would have brought his case before his fellow memebers of the Senate. Yes I agree Kerry QUIT to soon but why????I dont think because mathematics either.

McAllife must go and Dean must take the saddle of the party.....the party will go no where sitting in the middle.

Democracy as of Yesterday is now on a Break.....enjoy the fascism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. I agree that Senator Boxer should have the lead
in the fight for the '08 nomination. Maybe if we make that widely known some of the other Democrats will start to fall in line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. Great letter!
You made some excellent points there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. He knows they stole it and he knows there is nothing he could have done..
short of civil war. Our government is corrupted, if you haven't come to this conclusion by now, well, there's not much we can do about that. He did the smartest thing he could do. He stood back and let the issue take center-stage not him. He did a good job. Hell, if you examine the evidence, it's clear he won and won decisively. What more can you ask of your candidate? Kerry won, get over it... Instead of allowing the Repubs to destroy him in the eyes of the millions who voted for him, stand with him. You may say that he didn't stand for us but he did. Do you honestly think Sen Boxer would have stood if Kerry had asked her not to? No. No way, no how. Support him again. Don't lose heart. Let's change the system.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I do support him
I just believe that he is using the wrong strategy, and I hope that if enough people express that opinion to him, he will reconsider.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Agree. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC