I just wrote the following after getting slightly annoyed about an editorial in the Cincinnatti Enquirer.
Regarding...
http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050416/EDIT01/504160357/1020/EDITDear Editor,
Regarding your latest editorial on the voting technology debate.
To describe the debate over voting technolgy as a "fruitless" debate is an astonishingly short sighted view of events in your own state.
I am more than 10,000 miles away in New Zealand and I can clearly see that the debate is not fruitless. Rather, it is vital. Not only to the future of your state, but your nation and indeed the world.
As you probably well know, your recent recount was to all intents and purposes rendered a pointless exercise by jiggery pokery by election officials and machine manufacturers. And even you regard the recount as the work of troublemakers, it would be truly foolish not to acknowledge that your state has serious issues to address.
Rather than pointing the finger at so-called "conspiracy theorists" and intimating that the voting technology debate is an "inconvenience" your paper ought to be looking after ensuring that democratic process in your backyard is conducted to the best possible standards.
If the news media in any country has any task that is more important than all others it is safeguarding democracy. In a free and democratic society the role of the media is to inform the public so they can hold their elected officials to account. Clearly if the election part of the equation breaks down then the system does not work.
Finally as regards Diebold Election Systems, rather than approving of any decision to purchase their machines, if your editorial writer has eyes let them read.
http://scoop.co.nz/features/usacoup.htmlThere is more than enough material linked off this page, and many other websites too, which shows clearly why rather than purchasing voting equipment off this company your Secretary of State ought to be suing them.
California has done so and received a significant settlement from the company as a result of false claims made about the security of Diebold products. It is extraordinarily unlikely that similar false claims have not also been made in Ohio.
In the spirit of trans-pacific defense of democracy.
Alastair Thompson
Scoop.co.nz
New Zealand