Could this be a good example of why there is
so much effort to discredit the exit poll discrepancy evidence lately?
Think about what this could mean for the Bush administration. An independent, highly respected, international election monitoring group begins investigating OUR 2004 presidential election? Looking for the possibility that, just as in the Ukraine, the "winning" candidate didn't actually win?
And meanwhile, our own Carter/Baker Election Reform Commission won't even allow the USCV exit poll discrepancy evidence to be presented at either the first hearing in April, or the upcoming one on June 30th? Could this begin to look like
a CLEAR DOMESTIC COVER-UP?
Check out this post that was coincidentally(?) made yesterday.
These are mighty strong words. It really does make me wonder...
"USCV's Working Paper - and this analysis of WPE - is
fatally flawed" <bolding mine>
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x372464#374259Are things beginning to heat up? Stay tuned folks,
June could turn out to be the most important month since the election was stolen.