Will OHIO election Documentary be useful tool for next time?

[papau]

The Usual GOP message via a documentary that used 15 camera crews across Ohio to chronicle the final days of the house-to-house struggle between Republican and Democratic political organizers in OHIO with the NY Times saying it shows Bush's consistent message vs. Kerry no message, Kerry not attacking and restraining Democrats from attacking Bush at Dem convention vs. Bush attacking Kerry at GOP convention - all coming from a director whose Dad was prominent Democratic donor. It will be interesting to watch it in person to see how biased this write-up is. :-)

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/10/movies/10ohio.html


Is There a Hit Film in the Battle for Ohio?

Marissa Roth for The New York Times

To the lengthening list of political films vying for the attention of a polarized public, James D. Stern - a serious Hollywood financier and Broadway producer who dabbles at directing his own movies - hopes to add one that looks squarely at the 2004 presidential campaign between President Bush and Senator John Kerry.<snip>

While it lacks the partisanship and personality of Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11," the as-yet-untitled picture relies on a dispassionate, journalistic delivery - Mr. Stern's liberal leanings notwithstanding - to provide concise, pointed and even funny answers to anyone still wondering how Mr. Bush managed to defeat Mr. Kerry.

<snip>The resulting film, which the co-directors are still polishing in hopes of getting it accepted by the Sundance Film Festival, shows Republican campaigners functioning like a well-oiled machine and Democrats looking incapable of ordering lunch, let alone organizing a major get-out-the-vote operation. These scenes, interspersed with interviews with top strategists for both the Bush and the Kerry campaigns - with the glaring exceptions of Karl Rove and Bob Shrum - by and large leave the impression that the Bush campaign was run by major-league professionals and the Kerry campaign by bush-league amateurs.

One sequence is particularly memorable: After Tad Devine, a top Kerry consultant, is quoted earnestly explaining the Democrats' strategic decision to appeal to swing voters, or "persuadables," an unshaven young Democratic operative is shown knocking on doors of these supposed persuadables in Ohio. When a young man eating his breakfast says he is leaning to the Republican side, the hapless organizer meekly asks, "Can I persuade you otherwise?" but has nothing more to add as the door shuts in his face.<snip>

[blm]

1. Except it was Clinton who advised MacAuliffe and the DNC to not bash Bush

at the convention. He said the American people would only vote for ideas.

True.....if American people had a REAL media like they had in 1992.

Not with today's media. Clinton and his entire gang never mention the media's role in working with Rove.

The only way Clinton was impeached was because a news media allowed the GOP to define high crimes .

And by the time Gore ran the 24/7media was damn near controlled by the GOP and then 9-11 put the rest of the majors squarely in Bush's boat.

It took a category 5 hurricane to counter the category 5 mediaspin protecting the White House.

The documentary really succeeds at representing two basic truths - the RNC runs as smoothly as the Village of Stepford.when it comes to keeping its people in line.

And Dems are real people.