Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NBC with Brokaw just had a report

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Action Jackson Donating Member (103 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 06:59 PM
Original message
NBC with Brokaw just had a report
I gotta run, but it was a negative report. What frustrates me most about these latest reports is that nobody is mentioning the insecurities of the machines and how vulnerable they are to hacking.

They never interview the computer scientist experts. We need to get more of the nonpartisan computer scientist experts on the air to explain how bad these machines are and how easily they are hacked into. And nobody is mentioning the lack of a paper trail which leaves recounts impossible. I really don't understand why these basic facts are being ignored in the current crop of mainstream stories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Brokaw is a TOOL
of this administration.

Pay no attention to him. Do not watch him.

I doubt that writing to him and telling him where he is wrong would do a damn thing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nordic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. they're ALL tools. Except for Olberman
they're all just corporate mouthpieces
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GuardingVirginia Donating Member (80 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. W Post
The Washington Post mentioned Caltech-MIT was working the issue. I wonder what they've come up with? I keep hoping an accountant or statitician jumps in. Can't you just see a group of college students up all night pouring over the data!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dancing_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Avi Rubins Students at Johns Hopkins Already Are
Going over the Diebold source code, and have found major hole which could facilitate fraud:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/11/10/1172/9052
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Step one is proving that it's possible.
Edited on Thu Nov-11-04 07:38 PM by NRK
It's step two we need--proving that it happened.

On edit: By that I mean, if we know it was done via modem, we should be able to prove it with phone records.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. This isn't news and it was only the code for the DREs, not
the GEMS code, which tabulates the votes centrally. Their contribution is important, but I wanted to point this out.

Here's another really good article, even tho Rubin dismisses the idea of fraud and, again, doesn't make it clear he and his team didn't look at anything but the Windows-CE based DRE code.

Jewish Times link 10/29/04: http://www.jewishtimes.com/scripts/edition.pl?now=10/29/2004&stay=1&SubSectionID=48&ID=2435
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. DAMN!!
All commercial programs have provisions to be encrypted so as to protect them from having their contents read or changed by anyone not having the key..The line that staggered the Hopkin's team was that the method used to encrypt the Diebold machines was a method called Digital Encryption Standard (DES), a code that was broken in 1997 and is NO LONGER USED by anyone to secure prograns.F2654hd4 was the key to the encryption. Moreover, because the KEY was IN the source code, all Diebold machines would respond to the same key. Unlock one, you have then ALL unlocked.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/11/10/1172/9052
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedonkey Donating Member (644 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Don't take their
reporting to heart.Listen to them.YES! But DON"T let them get to you!
MSM is the enemy! Sounds dramamtic and coocoo,but I'm neither.They try to make us give up!
Don't let up!Keep going til THEY get the message.Remember THEY screwed us in 2000!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. because they don't care. they WANT this to be discredited
because their ownership wants to continually have the finger of control on the results between two somewhat bland candidates and the LESS business-friendly one will lose every time from now on.

Believe me, there will come a time very soon when the federal regulatory agencies STOP dealing with companies who lie to customers or prosecuting those who make a faulty product.

It is going to be one big "fuck Americans" decade. The USA is a mature market. Just like with mature products in a product life cycle. It's all about no more innovation on the product. Only on maximizing profits and minimizing expenses.

We are going to see the cases go up by a factor of 1000 where American citizens are well and truly fucked by faceless corporations with no one sitting in a seat of accountability.

The NETWORKS' owners WANT THIS. So to their advertisers in increasing numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Verve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. Please someone email Chip Reid and Tom Brokaw
about their one sided story. I'll be able to later tonight but gotta put dinner on the table. Chip Reid had the nerve to infer that the 4000 extra Bush votes in Ohio was just a story, along with other inferences. Why didn't he do his work and actually call up the county? Also, when he finds out that this is actually true and finds out that the county has no idea why this happened maybe he can take that little brain of his and infer that just maybe it happened in other areas. Especially if they don't know what caused it.
As frustrating as this story was at least it's starting to be covered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack_Dawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. chip.reid@nbc.com
Get him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Here's a point to share --
They consistently don't do anything but promote the "official story" rather than report the news. The "official story" is that there was nothing wrong or untoward about this election. The FACTS are otherwise, and they are apparently either too lazy or too indebeted to the power structures in this country to report anything but the easy, and often wrong, "official story."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. Tom Brokaw is a stooge. Was he all teary tonight about
"the Greatest Generation?" I wish he'd gather up his oedipal problems and take a hike.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. NBC / Brokaw
What has happened to good ol' fashioned "Journalism"? Does anyone practice that anymore, or do they just hear one story and add their spin to it?

I am so f*cking sick of these people dismissing stories before they have even looked at the evidence. What a bunch of dipshits.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. ALWAYS they ignore
any real details about the horrible premises of GOP private companies and their sh&tty software and the GEMS and everything. They always meme it to kid hackers and other "repairable "glitches". Diebold might as well be writing the reports I've seen in the media who betray invincible ignorance and parroting the corporation for the most part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimmyp Donating Member (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
16. Names of Computer Scientists?
I totally agree with you. Do you have names of computer scientists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackstraw45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
17. I thought Brokaw was GONE after the election...what a rip-off!
General Electric Propaganda Network hasn't retired him off as promised yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmyCrat Donating Member (721 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
18. Here's the Article on MSNBC's website

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6463505/
<snip>---
Internet theories on election abound
Even Democratic Party officials discount claims of unfair practices

President Bush declared victory eight days ago, but in the parallel universe known as the Internet, the presidential campaign is still raging. Web sites hostile to the president claim massive vote fraud, that the election was stolen, that Sen. Kerry really won.

Presidential candidate Ralph Nader says Republican officials in Ohio skewed the election towards Bush.
---<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC