Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

$13 Million No-Bid Sweetheart Deal with Diebold Draws Fire from activists

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Amaryllis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 12:26 PM
Original message
$13 Million No-Bid Sweetheart Deal with Diebold Draws Fire from activists
Press release from True Vote MD

Electronic Pollbooks Not Necessary for Early Voting
$13 Million No-Bid “Sweetheart Deal” with Diebold
Draws Fire from Election Integrity Activists

Takoma Park, MD: The implementation of early voting and of the federally mandated statewide voter registration database has been such a headache that the administrators of elections in several Maryland counties have recently resigned, including those in Prince Georges, Anne Arundel and Wicomico Counties.

Wednesday the State Board of Elections quietly tried to sneak a $13 million sweetheart deal with Diebold Election Systems, Inc., through the Board of Public Works to buy electronic pollbooks in time for this fall’s early voting. Since there are other vendors that sell e-pollbooks, the state would normally issue a carefully written RFP and thoroughly investigate each product available, as they do with other purchases of this magnitude. Instead they are trying to rush into a no-bid contract with a company that has been uncooperative lately in answering their questions about possible security vulnerabilities in Maryland’s voting equipment.

The haste with which the SBE is seeking to consummate this deal is in stark contrast to their protestations a few short weeks ago that there was no time to make major changes to our voting system before this fall’s elections. That was when the question was about replacing our paperless touchscreen voting machines with precinct-based optical scanners—a change favored by 57% of Maryland voters, according to a recent survey by Gonzales Research. One of the complaints the SBE voiced about the Voter-Verified Paper Ballot bill was that it might force the state into working with a specific vendor. But it seems that their tune changes when the vendor is Diebold.

“TrueVoteMD has no objection to the concept of early voting, but we have serious concerns about how it will be implemented in Maryland with our unverifiable electronic voting machines,” said Alex Zeese, State Coordinator of TrueVoteMD. “Specifically, our objection is to the rash purchase, untested use and of electronic pollbooks and the troubled implementation of the voter registration database.”

The federal Help America Vote Act (HAVA) of 2002 requires all states to have a statewide voter registration database in place by 2006. Like most other states, Maryland has struggled to meet this deadline, and the problems encountered in converting county databases into the new format have not yet been fully resolved. A recent study by the Brennan Center for Justice at the New York University School of Law found that nearly one-fifth of new voter registrations may be disqualified in the transition and dropped from the voter rolls. Operating the 2006 elections with this significant change alone presents major challenges. But on top of that, the State Board of Elections now wants to insert an additional new product into the mix: electronic pollbooks.

Paper pollbooks and Voter Authority Cards—the index cards each voter signs when checking in at a polling place—are some of the few remaining safeguards against voter fraud in Maryland’s otherwise paperless voting system. They provide an independent means to verify exactly who voted in an election and to determine how many votes should have been tallied by the voting machines. Replacing them with electronic pollbooks—which the SBE insists is necessary to implement early voting in Maryland—adds yet another layer of untested technology between the voter and the voting process.

Since these e-pollbooks would interface directly with the state’s voter registration database via the Internet, altering the database in the process, the potential to disenfranchise large numbers of voters through computer malfunctions, system crashes, bad programming, or even hacking or fraud, is enormous.

“Electronic pollbooks are not needed if early voting is done the same way it is in states such as Texas, where it is essentially treated as walk-in absentee voting,” said Linda Schade, Executive Director of TrueVoteMD. “Voters mark their choices on absentee ballots that are canvassed with all other absentee ballots after election day. If a voter has voted at the polls on Election Day, their early ballot is disqualified and not counted. That would be the safest, simplest method of providing early voting this year—and it would prevent the state from pouring millions more dollars into pork that enmeshes us more deeply with Diebold.”

http://truevotemd.org/content/view/467/82/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is a filthy, stinking outrage!
Edited on Mon May-08-06 12:45 PM by LiberalEsto
I am going to e-mail my legislators today.

Unfortunately, the Democrats haven't wanted to step on the toes of sleazebag Linda Lamone, a Dem who heads the Maryland Board of Elections. My husband wrote to Montgomery County Exec (and gubernatorial candidate) Doug Duncan last year about forcing her out, and he sent Dave a really nasty letter in reply. That's one reason we support O'Malley for governor.

I don't know why everyone is protecting Lamone. She's the one who brought Diebold into Maryland, after they wined and dined her on a yacht cruise on the Potomac River.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amaryllis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. But the gov of MD has not been so happy with her as of late, I thought?
He was calling for all paper ballots and said he had no confidence in MD elections...have you read Bradblog on all this? He has doing a lot of reporting on it in recent months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Maybe Brad should ask his office why the change of heart.
That must have been one really nice dinner. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R......nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
ARRRghhh! :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. What the hell happened?? I thought MD was so done with Diebold...
only questions now are who got bought off and for how much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nicknameless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Those are EXACTLY the questions that must be answered.
:grr:

k+r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anoraksia53 Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 03:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. who'dda guessed that the House
would pass a law for paper ballots unanimous, the Republican governor would support it, and then the Democratic-controlled Senate votes down the whole thing.

MD Democrats must need a good cleaning out. This smells BAD!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmarcus Donating Member (97 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
9. I think you can go in through the pollbook to get to the machine
those pollbooks are wireless and no one is looking at how someone might be able to get in that way. They aren't even certified. I started asking a whole bunch of questions about them at my county and they just act like "no worries"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC