Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CA: Riverside County Deceived Paper Ballot Voters During June 6th Primary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 03:38 AM
Original message
CA: Riverside County Deceived Paper Ballot Voters During June 6th Primary
I eat my words. I recently posted that while voting absentee is not the solution it's made out to be, it's reasonable advice if the alternative is using a DRE. Wrong.

Riverside County CA Deceived Paper Ballot Voters During June 6th Primary

Those Requesting Paper Ballots Had Privacy Violated and Votes Entered Into E-Voting Machines Anyway!

by John Gideon

6/25/2006

Many Riverside County California voters went to the polls on primary election day, June 6, with the plan that they would use their right to request paper ballots instead of voting on the Sequoia Edge Direct Recording Electronic (DRE, touch-screen) voting machines.

Those voters will probably be surprised to learn that the county Registrar of Voters thumbed her nose at them. The paper/absentee ballots they were given, Xerox copies of the ballot on 8 1/2×11 paper, were then punched into the DRE's by election workers later. The same touch-screen systems the voters had wanted to avoid by requesting a paper ballot in the first place. This was all done without their knowledge, without their permission, and without their ability to verify that their ballots were voted as they had voted them.

Moreover, the voters were forced to attach their names and addresses to the ballots! So much for private voting in Riverside!…

snip

Thanks to Art we also have a copy of the instructions that were used by elections workers to do this work.

snip/link to elections workers instructions

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=2996

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 03:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. More BS from Brad....
Edited on Mon Jun-26-06 03:45 AM by wakeme2008
The point of paper ballots are they CAN BE RECOUNTED MANUALLY...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 04:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Er, that would be John Gideon.

And one of the points of his article is that these voters not only have to worry about electronic vote counting (probably a given with an OpScan ballot, anyway) but they still have to worry about electronic vote casting on the DRE AND a poll worker casting the vote for them to boot.

BS?

And if the whole "point of paper ballots are they CAN BE RECOUNTED MANUALLY" what about VVPAT?

Oh. And "CAN BE RECOUNTED". Right. Can be. Don't hold your breath.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lindisfarne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. And the Democratic Party will ignore this, just as they are ignoring poll
workers taking home voting machines in San Diego.

Un=f=ing believable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lindisfarne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. This HAS to be illegally casting a vote for another person, I would
think? And unauthorized, at that. The voter did not authorize someone else to enter their vote into the machine. The voter wanted their vote to have a paper trail, and that the votes would be directly tallied from the BALLOT, not with an intermediary step.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. Riverside County election officials are lawless criminals!
When former CA Sec of State Kevin Shelley was elected in 2002, he found a situation of utterly compromised election integrity--wrought by the previous Sec of State, Repub Bill Jones and his chief aid Alfie Charles, the two reprobates who authorized these election theft machines in Calif, then jumped from "public service" into working for Sequoia, one of the three main election theft corporations. One of the first things Shelley did was to provide Californians with a PAPER BALLOT OPTION. The WHOLE POINT of this law was to respond to citizen concerns about electronic voting systems! Corrupt county election officials like those in Riverside defied the law by denying voters paper ballots, lying that none were available, forcing voters to vote on provisional ballots, and other tactics, reported in 2004.

Shelley is also responsible for Calif's early insistence on a "voter verified paper ballot" for all voting. But that is not all he did. He went after this whole corrupt scene of dirty deals between county election officials and Diebold for purchase of the worst of Diebold's election theft machines, the touchscreens (DREs). Diebold lied to Shelly about the security and certification status of these machines. He sued Diebold for their lies, and de-certified the touchscreens prior to the 2004 election (in March). He also demanded to see their source code (part of the lawsuit). He further withheld the "Help America Vote Act" (HAVA) federal money from the counties for purchase of these election theft machines. This was money from the $4 billion electronic voting boondoggle appropriated by the biggest crooks in Congress, Tom Delay and Bob Ney, for the purpose of larding Bush's buds at Diebold and ES&S, and corrupting election officials from one end of this land to the other. Shelley thus created havoc among the local crooks in Riverside and other counties, who couldn't make their payoff's to Diebold. They were furious. Led by Diebold shill Connie McCormack, head of Los Angeles elections--who testified to the state legislature that she wanted to "drive a bulldozer" into the Sec of State's office to get her blood money for Diebold--a group of these miscreant county officials (including Riverside) sued Shelley to get the money. That suit died of its own stupidity.

Calif proceeded with the 2004 election without Diebold touchscreens for the easy flipping of votes from Kerry to Bush (as reported in Ohio). Kerry won the state by a 10% margin*. But the criminals in Riverside, Los Angeles and several other counties were not done with Shelley--nor was the Bush junta. Charges of corruption against Shelley first surfaced just prior to 2004 election--in the crappiest newspaper in the state (and perhaps the world), the SF Chronicle. They seemed substanceless. And they seemed to go away. But then they resurfaced after the election. Chief among them was the charge that Shelley had "misused HAVA funds." This turned out merely to be Shelley's denial of Diebold's blood money to the corrupt county officials--his perfect right as Sec of State. It was a smear campaign--a "swiftboating." A "swiftboating" is where the guy who is honest gets shafted, and the dirtbags win--all done by the war profiteering corporate news monopolies by means of their draconian control of the newsstream. Another charge was that he used HAVA money to send personnel to partisan meetings. That turned out to be bogus as well. A third had to do with campaign corruption, which, it turns out, he was completely innocent of (as he was of all these "yellow journalism" charges). But a big stink was stirred up in the state legislature by Connie McCormack and her gang of election thieves--and by this time the other war profiteering corporate news monopolies were chiming in--the Sacto Bee, the L.A. Times--all repeating the bogus charges day after day. Hearings were held. Shelley was raked over the coals. The new state Dem leadership (the old guard had just retired) completely abandoned him. The Dems, with a 2 to 1 majority, hid under their desks, and some outright colluded with the corrupt county officials. The few who wanted to defend Shelley were strongarmed not to.**

The Tom Delay-created, Bush-appointed, federal Election Assistance Commission (implementer of the "Help America Vote for Bush Act") started making noises about a "thorough" investigation of Shelley and his "misuse of HAVA funds." Shelley had no personal money for his legal defense (--tells you something about Shelley). His mother died in the middle of all this, and he gave up and resigned (in Feb. '05). The state Dems then let Schwarz APPOINT a Republican as Sec of State, Diebold shill Bruce McPherson, who has now illegally RE-certified Diebold touchscreens.

In summary, Riverside county election officials SUCK, and it should be no surprise that they are messing with peoples' paper ballot votes. Scanning them into DREs! I mean, re-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-eally!

------------------------------------------

*(Kerry won California by 10%, statewide. Barbara Boxer, far to the left of Kerry, retained her US Senate seat by 20%, statewide. That might be explained by incumbency or other causes, except that the difference between these two margins of victory is entirely to be found in Republican counties. Go figure. A significant number of voters in Republican-controlled counties voted for Bush...and Boxer? What likely happened--since this weirdness does not seem to be related to voting machines--is that votes were switched from Kerry to Bush in the central electronic tabulators, and the counties chosen for this switch were the ones with the most corrupt and criminal county election officials, who could be counted on to look the other way--the Republican-controlled counties, like Riverside.)

**(The Dems were working deals with Schwarzenegger, and, basically, sold off our right to vote for whatever porkbarrel they were negotiating. They're doing the same thing with the recently introduced Bush-Cheney impeachment resolution--sidelining it for porkbarrel deals with Schwarz. The introducer of the impeachment resolution--which a state can submit directly to Congress as a privileged resolution (it has been discovered--Jefferson's Rules)--said as much, on the Randi Rhodes show. Why a 2 to 1 Dem majority in the Calif state legislature has to compromise with this illegitimately elected Bush Oil Cartel governor, whose disapproval rating rivals Bush's, is beyond me.)

-----------------------------------------

HOPE. Yes, the "thing with feathers," as Emily Dickinson wrote. There is hope. Although Schwarz and McPherson both face elections this fall (McPherson, first election; Schwarz, first real election), and apparently badly need the Diebold touchscreens to win, McPherson has a very strong challenger for Sec of State, DEBRA BOWEN, an expert on electronics in government and a veteran advocate of open government, who has seriously questioned the integrity of electronic voting systems, and who held state senate hearings on McPherson's crimes for Diebold. Bowen won support from 80% of the rank and file Dems at the state convention (against an Hispanic rival, with expertise on health care--but clueless or corrupt on electronic voting). And Bowen is a fighter. She won't take a stolen election lying down. Or at least I hope she won't. (Who knows about Dems these days?) She sure SEEMS like a fighter--and a brilliant woman. We couldn't have a better candidate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. But, but, but...
...we have it on 'good' authority that everything is ok with the vote counts, and they say the machines - although capable of stealing millions of votes - didn't steal millions of votes.

They say we are "foolish" to even talk about machine theft cause it makes us look 'bad'.

Gee, what am I to believe? Tales like this from Peace Patriot, or the see no evil, the M$M agrees with us, know-it-all, 'good' experts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. And I always thought it was illegal for someone to 'tamper' with another
person's ballot and to require a ballot to be 'non-secretive'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Einsteinia Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. This happens with ALL many disability access votes
where the voting machine is not compatible with the tabulator.

Alameda County's Sequoia voting systems and its Diebold tabulators

Marin County's ES&S machines and its Diebold tabulators

Yep, the machine tally is recreated on a Diebold ballot so that it can be tallied with the other votes

Outrageous!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC