Don't let Carl Weiser of the Cinti Enquirer /Warren County lockdown get

[roseBudd]

away with this.

In Editor and Publisher Weiser said regarding RFKs article in Rollong Stone:
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/search/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002651747

Weiser of the Enquirer adds that Kennedy's obvious Democratic leanings do not help the validity of his story. "If a major Republican was saying this, I might be paying more attention to it," he says.

Contact:

Tom Callinan Editor 513-768-8551 [e-mail]
Liz Dufour Planning editor 513-768-8457 [e-mail]
Hollis Towns Managing Editor 513-768-8311 [e-mail]

Ray Cooklis Assistant editorial page editor: guest columns 513-768-8525 [e-mail]
Tony Lang Editorial writer: Kentucky issues 859-578-5569 [e-mail]
Byron McCauley Deputy editorial page editor 513-768-8473 [e-mail]
David Wells Assistant Managing Editor: Editorial page 513-768-8310 [e-mail]

Most important of all CALL Weiser until he picks up his phone:

Carl Weiser Assistant editor: Government/public affairs 513-768-8491 [e-mail]

[kster]

1. K&R......nt

[roseBudd]

2. The reporters and editors of the Cinti. Enquirer are infuriating yet...

they are still in the best position because of sources and geographic proximity to break the real story of the Warren County lockdown, the stickers on ballots in Clermont and the so-called 91 precinct "moist ballots in Clermont in the Hackett/schmidt race. Perhaps they can be shamed.

[liam_laddie]

3. K & R

for everyone in the Enquirer's (shrinking) readership area.

[roseBudd]

4. My comment to that blog entry...

That Weiser would use the excuse that if a Republican had called attention to the many questionable aspects of the Ohio 2004 election is laughable.

From Editor and Publisherr

Weiser of the Enquirer adds that Kennedy's obvious Democratic leanings do not help the validity of his story. "If a major Republican was saying this, I might be paying more attention to it," he says.

Uh, Carl why in the **** would a Republican admit to things like putting stickers on ballots in Clermont County or devising a story about an FBI/Homeland Security level 10 threat against Warren County so that the right for independent observation of the ballot tabulation could be subverted.

And don't forget Clermont County's problems with "moist ballots" in 91 precincts. Fortunately Hamilton, Warren, Sciota and Pike counties were blessed with a cold front on that hot August day.

And what Republican would admit to this:



Or this:



What Republican official would divulge purging eligable voters, denying provisional ballots cast at the right polling location but the wrong table/precinct?

Is suppression a Cincinnati Enquirer SW OH conservative value?

This paper has failed the citizens of this country.

Where is our Woodward and Bernstein? Not at the Enquirer

[autorank]

5. Well, this guy should edit a professional journal for a few months.

I don't know if they do it any more, but some professional journals used to have a policy on
new submissions. They would tear off the fact page leaving the abstract and the body of the paper
then commence the review. That assured that the reviewers would make their selections for
publication based on the content and not the author's reputation, connections, etc. It's a
great policy if you think about it.

So here is the solution for the analytically challenged Weiser: download the article, remove
Kennedy's name, and read. That should do the trick.

Of all the stupid criticisms I've heard of Kennedy's fine work, this ranks right up there.

Weiser should work for Salon!

[EFerrari]

6. It is a great policy and antithetical to crony capitalism, ain't it?

I wonder how much the Enquirer cost?

[autorank]

7. Probably doing it gratis;)

[roseBudd]

8. Let Tom Callinan, Hollis Towns, & David Wells know what you think about

Weiser's ignorant comment to Editor & Publisher. They still have egg on their face from Grandma in Iraq.

http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?Category=CONTACT