Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NY NewsDay: New Fix, But Voting Woes Linger

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 12:22 AM
Original message
NY NewsDay: New Fix, But Voting Woes Linger
As e-vendors undoubtedly know by now, New Yorkers are a tough audience.


New Fix, But Voting Woes Linger

One Long Island election official labeled it the start of "HAVA hell."

June 25, 2006

by Rick Brand

snip

Among the worries about the new systems are security, the amount of space needed, and whether counties will have to buy more machines because the capacity of computerized voting machines are far smaller than lever machines. The final question is whether Nassau and Suffolk can get delivery of 3,800 machines in time for next year's vote.

"The new systems are going to create more problems than they are going to solve," warned Suffolk County Executive Steve Levy, fearing the $14 million in federal aid to Suffolk will not fully cover putting a new system in place. "The $14-million is the tip of the iceberg," Levy said.

Beyond hardware, local election officials also worry that the new machines will require extensive training of election workers and a large number of new hires to replace inspectors, who may not want to learn the new system.

Others say the new systems may not do much for the handicapped for whom the machines are being made more accessible. William Biamonte, Nassau's Democratic elections commissioner, said a survey of 6,000 voters who use absentee ballots because of age or infirmity, showed little interest in new voting machines. "Their biggest response was lower my taxes," he said.

snip

http://www.newsday.com/news/columnists/ny-lipol264795520jun25,0,6192644.column?coll=ny-news-columnists

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Hava Hell"?? Welcome to the world. Please, take the time to
decompress. Don't try to take it all in at once, and we'll get you back to true atmospheric pressure.

You're doing great; we'll get through this okay. Keep breathing evenly, and keep your eyes open.

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimDandy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. Diebold: Draining Dollars and Democracy Day-by-Day.
Okay, don't know if they're Diebold machines, but "Diebold" was the only name that worked with my alliteration. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Diebold is so far little more than a bad joke in this part of the world.
When you have bi-partisan election administration, it's pretty hard to buy anything from a blatantly partisan seller. So far Avante seems to be leading the way in NY, but we are still early in the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Out here, Diebold is doing so well that my paper didn't even report
they were re-certified.

Now, THAT'S a big fat vote of confidence, isn't it? Or, maybe I meant confidence game.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimDandy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Diebold is a joke here too, an all too real one tho...
It sounds like your administrators are on the ball. I think real bi-partisanship (or multi-partisanship)is the key to a healthy democracy. When any party becomes excessively dominant, real oversight ceases to exist and corruption flourishes. When it's really bad, like here in Utah, even members of the dominant party, recognizing the illness, start to call for the kinds of changes that will bring more moderation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC