Future Presidential Elections
Note: Since it is a Press release I will copy the entire thing - hope it's ok
11/10/2006 12:56:00 PM
To: National Desk
Contact: Robert Brandon of Robert M. Brandon & Associates, 202-331-1550
WASHINGTON, Nov. 10 /U.S. Newswire/ -- As expected, voters casting ballots in the mid-term elections were confronted with significant obstacles to voting, including ID requirements, inadequate poll worker training, deceptive practices, problems with voting equipment and database/registration problems. Unlike past elections, there was no single "meltdown" confined to a particular state. Instead, nationwide, there were widespread systemic problems in our voting system that, in the aggregate, disenfranchised tens of thousands of voters and impacted many more.
Below, is a list of the most common problems that voters across the country faced on Election Day, some of the states where they most commonly occurred and solutions to these problems. The level of Election Day dysfunction requires the attention of state and local election officials now so these problems can be solved or minimized prior to the 2008 Presidential elections.
-----
Voter ID Requirements
While there is little evidence of voter impersonation, many states have implemented new voter ID requirements, creating a new obstacle to voting. New voter ID requirements plagued citizens across the country, especially in Arizona, Georgia, Indiana, Missouri, Ohio and Florida.
Strict voter ID requirements in Indiana and Arizona disenfranchised large numbers of eligible voters, many of whom had been voting their entire adult lives but found that they were unable to meet stringent new rules. In the past, these voters, like the rest of us, confirmed our identities by signing our names at the polling place, where poll workers compared the signature to the one on file to verify identity.
In Arizona poll workers were uncertain about the requirements they were actually enforcing, leading to inconsistent results. For example, many voters in Maricopa county who had proper ID were turned away or told to vote by provisional ballot while other who lacked proper ID were allowed to vote.
Despite the fact that voter ID requirements were found unconstitutional by courts in Georgia, Missouri and Ohio, poor poll worker training and public confusion about what forms of ID were acceptable resulted in large numbers of eligible voters being forced to vote by provisional ballot or being turned away from the polling place altogether. Even in states where expansive forms of identification are accepted, including Ohio, Colorado Michigan, Florida, Missouri, and South Carolina, confusion reigned among voters and poll workers alike as to what kind of ID would suffice. This lack of clarity resulted in the large numbers of eligible voters being improperly required to vote by provisional, as opposed to regular ballots. Other problems included poll workers in states like Maryland and Wisconsin improperly requesting ID, even though an ID from people who have voted in previous elections is not required.
--
Inadequate Pollworker Training
Inadequate poll worker training significantly contributed to the breakdown of the election process in many jurisdictions and across a number of states, especially Indiana, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio and Pennsylvania.
The breakdowns felt in virtually every area of election administration, including ID requirements, equipment, voter rolls and use of provisional ballots, exacerbated problems voters faced on Tuesday.
In Pennsylvania voters in Philadelphia indiscriminately distributed provisional ballots to persons who were eligible to vote by regular ballot while in other parts of the state poll workers refused to provide provisional ballots to voters who were clearly entitled to them. Similarly, in Ohio poll workers mistakenly told voters that they lacked required ID when in fact the IDs presented were sufficient; these voters were instructed to return with proper ID. Having already been turned away despite having the proper identification, returning with other ID would have simply barred them from voting by regular ballot. In other parts of the country, poll workers who determined that voters were not at the correct precinct were erroneously told to vote by provisional ballot, instead of being redirected to the correct precinct.
Human error resulting from poor training caused equipment problems in Michigan, Maryland, Pennsylvania and Indiana that resulted in delayed polling place openings.
--
Equipment Problems
A wide range of problems with voting machines in Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Maryland, Michigan, Pennsylvania and other parts of the country resulted in an unprecedented number of complaints to election officials and voter protection organizations.
Problems with machines delayed poll openings in Maryland, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Florida and Indiana. Other significant problems included inadequate numbers of machines assigned to polling places around the country including Florida. Improper screen alignment in some states, including Missouri, resulted in improper recording of votes or requiring the voter to vote multiple times. Other problems included confusing ballot screens, machines failing to record votes as cast, lack of disabled access and periodic inoperability and machine failures.
Colorado experienced periodic equipment shutdowns due to the fact that traditional precincts, merged into large vote centers, were all linked to one server, which could not handle all the traffic. As a result, voters were required to wait in lines for as long as three hours, leading to many people not voting at all, including those who could only take a limited amount of time off from work to vote, were disabled or elderly, had pressing family or other obligations that prevented them from waiting for lengthy periods of time. Colorado also experienced problems with ballot scanners which delayed the counting of absentee ballots in the state.
In Indianapolis, paper ballots were used to record votes for part of the day because poll workers were unable to attach cables linking optical scan voting machines to touch-screen equipment for physically impaired voters.
--
Registration/Purge Issues
A number of voter registration problems linked to state implementation of voter databases mandated by the Help America Vote Act of 2002 surfaced on Election Day. For example, in Texas and California, people who registered to vote discovered at the polls that their names were not on the rolls for reasons including human error in entering registration data and compiling databases. Many of these problems also resulted from the failure of state DMVs to properly forward registration to election officials. In many parts of the country newly married voters whose names on their drivers license did not match the names on the registration form were told they could not vote by regular ballot.
In Arizona, the state issued new voter registration cards that contained confusing information, resulting in large numbers of voters in Maricopa County going to the wrong precinct to vote.
--
Provisional Ballots
As expected, poorly trained poll workers, confusion about ID requirements, registration problems and database issues resulted in large numbers of eligible voters being forced to vote by provisional ballot. Problems were particularly acute in Ohio, Arizona, Georgia and Maryland. In addition to poor poll worker training about when provisional ballots should be used, the circumstances under which they are counted is often unclear. For example, in 2004, of the 2 million provisional ballots cast, only one-third were counted.
--
Absentee Ballots
Voters in a number of jurisdictions experienced significant problems with absentee ballots. Thousands of voters in Maryland, Ohio and Pennsylvania who had requested absentee ballots never received those ballots. When they arrived at their polling place to vote poll workers instructed them they could not vote by regular ballot.
--
Deceptive Practices/Voter Intimidation
Voters in numerous jurisdictions encountered instances of deceptive or intimidating conduct, most notably in Virginia, but also in many other states, including New Hampshire. In Virginia, voters received computer generated phone calls, or "robocalls," that improperly told them that they would be arrested if they showed up to vote because they were not properly registered; other voters were threatened with arrest if they showed up at the wrong polling place. Similar practices occurred elsewhere in the country In Georgia voters were improperly instructed at the polling place that a photo ID was required to vote, even though that state's photo ID law had been invalidated earlier in the year.
-----
Solutions
Many of these problems could be minimized, or eliminated altogether by 2008 if the following steps are undertaken by officials:
--
Election Day Registration (EDR)
Permitting eligible voters to register at the polling place on Election Day would minimize or eliminate many problems that occur. EDR eliminates confusion about voter identity, whether a person is properly registered to vote or was inadvertently removed from the rolls, virtually eliminating the need for provisional ballots. This year Montana implemented EDR, which, when combined with its expansive voter ID laws could serve as a model for other states.
--
Improved Standards for Poll Workers and Training
The vast majority of poll workers undertake this important civic task intending to carry out their obligations to the best of their ability. Their intent should not be undermined by inadequate training. Training should be improved so there is less likelihood of error or misinformation. Poll workers should receive uniform, consistent training about voting equipment and any legal requirements for voting, including ID and the use of provisional ballots. This training must be updated. In addition, election officials should adopt minimum, uniform standards for poll workers, employ them in greater numbers and increase their compensation.
--
Voting Machines that Meet Demand
Widespread problems in many jurisdictions due to inadequate numbers of fully operational machines at each polling place resulted in long lines and waits of up to three hours. Such waits disenfranchise significant numbers of voters who cannot wait. Officials must adopt appropriate formulas for purchasing and assigning voting machines. Better testing and maintenance of equipment, along with policies that encourage competitive bidding and discourage close relationships between election workers and equipment and software manufacturers are also necessary.
--
Appropriate Use of Statewide Voter Databases
Officials should adopt sensible, flexible matching criteria so these databases are not used to keep eligible voters off the rolls. Voters who are flagged as potentially ineligible should be given adequate notice to allow them to provide additional information in a timely manner in order to be included on the roll.
--
Adopt Measures Targeting Deceptive Practices
State and federal officials should adopt strong measures prohibiting deceptive practices, including intimidation and the dissemination of misinformation through telecommunications devices or the mail. Until then, existing consumer protection laws should be enforced, and persons responsible for such conduct should be prosecuted under new and existing laws.
-----
Experts and Resources
--Dr. DeForest Blake Soaries Jr., former chair, U.S. Election Assistance Commission
Soaries is the senior pastor of the First Baptist Church of Lincoln Gardens in Somerset, N.J. He chaired the U.S. Election Assistance Commission from 2004 to 2005 under the appointment of President Bush and served as New Jersey's Secy. of State under Gov. Christine Todd Whitman.
--Mary G. Wilson, president, League of Women Voters
Wilson is the 17th president of the League of Women Voters and an attorney with 30 years of experience in diverse fields of practice.
--Ray Martinez III, former vice chair, U.S. Election Assistance Commission
Martinez serves as a policy advisor on election issues to the Pew Center on States. He was a commissioner and vice chair of the U.S. EAC under the recommendation of former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle and the nomination of President Bush.
--Miles S. Rapoport, former Secretary of State, Connecticut
Rapoport served as Secretary of the State of Connecticut from 1995 to 1999. From 1985-1994, he served in the Connecticut House of Representatives, where he chaired the Government Administration and Elections Committee, leading efforts for election reform.
--Tova Andrea Wang, democracy fellow, Century Foundation
Wang is the executive director of The Century Foundation's Post-2004 Election Reform Working Group. She staffed the National Commission on Federal Election Reform, co-chaired by Presidents Carter and Ford and is a member of the New York City Bar Assoc. election law committee.
--Gracia Hillman, commissioner, U.S. Election Assistance Commission
Hillman was nominated by President Bush and confirmed by unanimous consent of the U.S. Senate to serve on the U.S. EAC. Hillman chaired the EAC in 2005 and serving as its first vice chair in 2004. She also directed the League of Women Voters, the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation and the National Coalition on Black Voter Participation.
-----
NOTE: Media representatives interested in scheduling an interview should contact Robert Brandon at 202-331-1550 for more information.
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=76136