Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Experts concerned as ballot problems persist.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Stevepol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 10:06 PM
Original message
NYT: Experts concerned as ballot problems persist.
Here's a rundown of a few of the many problems experienced with the Electronic Voting machine scam and con game this past election cycle. Maybe we're a step closer to getting paper, at least for the national elections. Courtesy John Gideon and VotersUnite

But after awhile you just wonder if there is even a spark of intelligence in DC anymore. Kucinich understands a little bit about all this and Dean slightly less perhaps, but who else at the national level even catches a sniff of how important it is to get rid of these machines -- or REALLY AUDIT them, not just pretend. Rush Holt maybe. Anyway, this article details some of the problems and it contains some really good quotes.

Experts Concerned as Ballot Problems Persist
By IAN URBINA and CHRISTOPHER DREW
Published: November 26, 2006




After six years of technological research, more than $4 billion spent by Washington on new machinery and a widespread overhaul of the nation’s voting system, this month’s midterm election revealed that the country is still far from able to ensure that every vote counts.

Tens of thousands of voters, scattered across more than 25 states, encountered serious problems at the polls, including failures in sophisticated new voting machines and confusion over new identification rules, according to interviews with election experts and officials.

snip...

Voting experts say it is impossible to say how many votes were not counted that should have been. But in Florida alone, the discrepancies reported across Sarasota County and three others amount to more than 60,000 votes. In Colorado, as many as 20,000 people gave up trying to vote, election officials say, as new online systems for verifying voter registrations crashed repeatedly. And in Arkansas, election officials tallied votes three times in one county, and each time the number of ballots cast changed by more than 30,000.

“If the success of an election is to be measured according to whether each voter’s voice is heard, then we would have to conclude that this past election was not entirely a success,” said Doug Chapin, director of Electionline.org, a nonpartisan election group that plans to release a report Wednesday with a state-by-state assessment of voting. “In places where the margin of victory was bigger than the margin of error, we looked away from the problems, but in 2008 we might not have that luxury.”

Link: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/26/us/politics/26vote.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC