Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

UPDATED (2): Widespread Cheating & Vote Suppression by Clinton Campaign in Clark County, NV

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
DaLittle Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 12:30 PM
Original message
UPDATED (2): Widespread Cheating & Vote Suppression by Clinton Campaign in Clark County, NV
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/1/19/162953/644/790/439573


If It Walks Like A Republican, Talks Like A Republican... Jiggers Batman... It MUST Be A Republican!

Another exampale of the absolutely unethical standard set by this first female candidate and her likewise ethically challenged supporters. THIS STUFF NEED STO BE REPORTED! :nuke:

UPDATED (2): Widespread Cheating & Vote Suppression by Clinton Campaign in Clark County, NV Hotlist
by thereisnospoon
Sat Jan 19, 2008 at 02:19:31 PM PST

.
*


Also, word on the ground is that caucuses on the Strip and in Reno were clean.

For all you doubters out there, all I can do is tell you what I directly experienced, and heard firsthand from other volunteers at the campaign office. As further corroboration, the Obama hotline to report irregularities was busy for a full ten minutes.

Finally, Obama supporters: please listen to Markos. He's right: Edwards people are not necessarily Obama 2nd choice: in fact, it's closer to the opposite. You're not doing us any favors.]

Hey everyone,

I'm reporting in from one of the Obama field offices in Clark County, NV. My girlfriend and I just came back from being the precinct captains at our caucus, and the scene here is ugly.

Everyone is reporting election irregularities on the part of the Hillary campaign. There is widespread cheating and voter suppression going on all over Clark County--and it's obviously coming in from the top down. Whether it made enough of a difference to swing the election is another question--but there is no question that Hillary was running a scorched-earth, no-holds-barred campaign in which all of her surrogates were instructed to cheat in every way possible.

To be clear about the caucus process here: caucus doors opened at 11am today; people are allowed to file in and register on location until 12 noon, at which time the doors close and no one else is admitted. Those registering were given non-binding ballots to fill out to help assess in case of problems with head count. At this point, the total number of people in the room are counted. Viability is determined (15%), and then the viable sections have 20 minutes to convince the uncommitteds/unviables. Final counts are then made.

Here are just a few of the irregularities from the Clinton campaign that have come to my ears, before I tell my own story. Word on the ground is that we have video of some of these shenanigans as well.

* UPDATE: The wording of the actual Party rules are unclear. At this point, it appears that the Hillary campaign may simply have interpreted the rules differently, rather than deliberately engaging in voter suppression. Regardless, however, the State Party interpreted the rules in our favor. No less than foureight Obama captains (including myself) have reported that Clinton operatives tried to close the doors at 11:30--a full thirty minutes before the doors were supposed to close. In some cases I am hearing they actually succeeded, and voters were turned away before more knowledgeable people could get there to reopen them. The Clinton campaign had obviously told their people to be there by 11:30--and they knew that the higher the turnout, the worse for them.
* At least two reports of Clinton operatives telling the uncommitteds and Edwards supporters, once their numbers were deemed not viable, that they had to leave. Whether these tactics succeeded or not, I do not know. Obviously, the Clinton campaign knew that voters not already in her camp were unlikely to join her camp (I know from my own experience that I convinced many more undecideds than my opponent Hillary operative), so they attempted to suppress their vote.
* At least one report of Clinton operatives telling Obama supporters with viable numbers that they were not viable, and had to leave. From what I hear, some of those voters did in fact leave.
* At least two reports (including my own) of disabled voters being coerced into the Clinton camp against their will, or even having their voter card filled out for them against their will.
* A few reports of probable out-of-state Clinton operatives being counted among the voters--though since checking ID is illegal, and other Hillary operatives from in-state would vouch for them, it's impossible to say.
* At least one report of two large men standing outside the door checking voters for whom they would support, and telling all Obama people they were at the wrong location.
* At least one other report of Hillary operatives doing the check-in, and telling all Obama supporters that they were not on the list, could not register at the location (not true), and that they could not caucus.
* At least one report of ballots being filled out in advance for Hillary in mass.
* At least one report of Hillary supporters saying that the caucus location was just the Hillary room--and that Obama supporters had to go to a faraway location.
* At least one report of a voter registration list only in Spanish, and only with Hillary supporters on it. Obama supporters later found the registration list with the rest of the people--in the garbage can of the ladies restroom.
* Several reports of Hillary signs on the registration table, and Hillary supporters in Hillary shirts doing registration.

And there's much, much more. It's only just getting started to come through. How many of these tactics worked is unclear. Certainly, aggressive Obama volunteers like myself should have nipped many of these in the bud, but we're actually counting on concerned citizens who care--not machine operatives trained to cheat and brought up in the nearly criminal Nevada machine and the ruthless, conscience-less Hillary campaign.

Here's my story:

I got to the location at 10:30am and set up. The Hillary people were already there. In charge of them was a 60-ish woman with a slight Brooklyn accent. Here were the irregularities in my precinct alone:

* The Hillary operative tried to force the doors to close at 11:30am. KK was outside greeting people, and she overheard the Hillary campaign mention that the doors would be closing at 11:30am, and she went to talk to the precinct chair. So we intervened and said that that was absolutely not legal by the rules. She then started screaming at the chair to close the doors. When he read the rules that they were open until 12noon, she said that "that's not what I was told, other campaigns were spreading misinformation." We stood our ground, and the doors remained open.
* A man in a wheelchair came in with his daughter, and said he was an Edwards supporter. When his daughter began to wheel him to the middle of the room, the Hillary operative tapped her on the shoulder, took the wheelchair and took him to the Clinton corner. I rushed over from talking to an undecided voter and objected loudly, but his daughter was a Hillary person. The Clinton operative said, "I don't control what he does; she does." At that point I said to the man, "Nobody controls you. If you want to vote for Edwards, you have every right to go to the center of the room. Do you need help?" He looked at me plaintively, but said nothing as his daughter dragged him farther back into the corner and just shook his head.
* The Clinton operative herself had a Brooklyn accent and I overheard her mention having been from New York. When she stood to be counted in the middle of the room, I objected and asked her if she was actually from Nevada. She said yes. I talked to the chair and asked him to ask her name and find her on the list. He asked her her name and checked the list, and she was not on it. At this point the chair said, "well, I can't ask for ID." I said, "She can't participate if no one will vouch for her." At this point a Hispanic man wearing a Hillary shirt said she was his wife. While that's not impossible, it was also improbable--but I had no way to verify or object further.
* One voter who hadn't even finished registering said that she was undecided, and the Hillary operative physically escorted her to the Hillary side. I went to talk to the woman, but she was immediately surrounded by 3 Hillary supporters who would not let me in, and I had to attend to others registering at that point (our operatives were outnumbered by hers 2-1).
* Hillary supporters were doing check-in, and a Hillary sign was behind them. I forced the sign off the table, and I went to the front desk to verify that everything went according to the rules at checkin--but if nothing else, the necessity of doing so prevented me from doing other needed work.

Even so, KK and I managed to convince 6 undecided/Edwards voters (Edwards & uncommitted both lacked viability in my caucus), while their cheating, ruthless operatives only convinced two--and our caucus outperformed the field, garnering 4 delegates to her 5. It was intense--and it was war. I knew what the Clinton operatives were up to, and they knew I knew. It was bloodless war; I almost feel pity for the goodhearted Obama volunteers who were unprepared for the level of sociopathy that I expected--and encountered--from the Clinton campaign.

--------------------------------------

After being a part of this campaign, doing this work, and seeing this level of viciousness from a supposedly Democratic candidate, it will be a cold day in hell before I do any work for anyone in any way associated with Hillary Clinton. At this point, even my general election vote is in question. I am furious almost to the point of nausea. There are so many young, idealistic activists here who are absolutely crushed--not because we lost here, but because of the way we "lost." Disillusionment is running extremely high--and I doubt very much of many of them will be back in 2008, or ever again. Illegal and immoral campaign tactics like this aren't just reprehensible: they also come at a cost to the party in the long run.

Leaving behind the triangulating, DLC politics of the Clintons, this crap leaves me with just one question: with Democrats like these, who needs Republicans? Good Point but fact is these people are Republicans. Ya don't need to be registered as one to act like one.... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. People who work against fareness are low life scum bags and that includes Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Precinct captains from the other campaigns - now there's an unbiased source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's an eyewitness account.
If I had to pick between the veracity of a total stranger and Hillary "a candidate shouldn't tell everything they're thinking" Clinton or Bill "I did not have sex with that woman" Clinton, I'm thinking I've got to give the total stranger at least a moment's benefit of the doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. wow - it was not "great" at all in my caucus - but from the description that is horrible...
we were downright picture perfect by comparison...

Obama AND Hillary supporters worked TOGETHER to do the best we untrained persons could do in the circumstances...

I fault the Democratic Party for not having enough TRAINED representatives or volunteers present.

It seems to me, as a Hillary voter, that NOBODY should have been allowed to wear their shirts at the registration/check-in process.

The Hillary persons were there for almost an hour before ANY Obama staff showed up at all...

If the Obama people want to make sure they have as big an impact, they need to get there EARLY also.

It seemed "unseemly" at the least to see all the directional signs posted with Hillary campaign signs attached to it.

I looked around an couldn't see a single Obama sign. I showed up at around 9:30/10:00 to make sure I could vote in the right place - to just vote - but as soon as I got there - a Hillary supporter pasted a Hillary sticker on me - I didn't "mind" because I was gonna vote for her anyway - but it seemed rather odd.

Then, it seemed - just the Hillary people were running the check-in/registration process - they were all nice and such - but everyone ssemed as clueless to the correct process as me - there seemed to be only one person - a Hillary supporter - who knew what they were doing.

I tried to make sure if I made a directional sign, that I made one for the Obama side and the Hillary side - but I didn't see any Obama people trying to do what I was doing.

Now, to their credit - the Hillary people were very helpful to ALL, and all camps were very friendly and coordinated things with one another - but it was strange that the Hillary supporters were so out in front on things and manning all the tables in our two precints room.

But then again, noone from the Obama side took the iniative to try to "lead" either - in fact, until I volunteered to step into the MC/moderator spot to help announce what was being done next, I think we'd all still be there trying to figure out what to do next!

Why wasn't there some neutral party official there (is that an oxymoron?) to oversee things - how about an elections official. I guess it was a party affair so no impartial officials were avialiable or required.

I'll give the Hillary people one thing - they were extremely ORGANIZED as much as it was - but that is where it fell down, IMO.

Maybe I'm partly to blame - I hoped to just skate by and "vote" without really "participating" - they had announcements for MONTHS to get people to the training - you can only ask then people like me have to either step up to the plate or skate by like I did...

But I am sooo impressed with ALL of us - I've said it before and will say it again - ALL of us - Obama AND Hillary persons were just NEIGHBORS trying to DO THE RIGHT THING even without much direction - and at that I think we succeeded...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thanks for your very thorough and UNBIASED reporting, Tank.. hopefully this will
all boil down to one side being perhaps over-organized, and another not being as organized in the precincts. It is disturbing to hear such allegations and I hope it can all be explained after a thorough investigation :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Excellent account
I will take your word over any third party person, especially considering the bias that this poster has shown in past posts. They have no credibility - you do and have tried to be fair to both sides - kudos. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's a long time since Maya Angelou didn't know where her next meal was coming from,
I dare say, but I hope she reads this and weeps for her fond gullibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. The other day when there were eye-witness accounts of voter
intimidation that favored Obama--everyone on DU said without proof this is just a bunch of lies.

Double standard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. It amazes me how people have such short memories. picking and
Edited on Sun Jan-20-08 01:22 PM by MassDemm
choosing what makes them feel better.

Caucuses suck, I've been saying it since Iowa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I think they do too - but one poster said it yesterday:
I guess the caucus did ONE of the things that the Democratic Party wanted - it got us all to MEET each other - IN PERSON - and at least here in my corner of the woods in Henderson - I LIKE ALL of the Dems - no matter which "camp" they were in...

It's only as good as the people themselves make it.

If the goal is to be a unified PARTY then that will be the outcome.

If the goal is to make yourself "right" AT THE EXPENSE OF ALL OTHERS - then tha will be the outcome, also...

It's OUR party - to make of it what we want - or to "break" it beyond repair - it's OUR choice how we behave to one another...

Now I've got to work on re-setting my "tourets syndrome" button to only take effect around REPUKES, not fellow democrats who may disagree with me on many points...!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. This article isn't biased - not at all
/sarcasm

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. The writer is up front about his position and there's an LBN article
with the same story about the Clinton campaign trying to get the doors closed.

Disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. At least one report of bullshit on DU. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC