Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Election Fraud Polling Analysis: The Urban Legend ( TIA )

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:23 AM
Original message
Election Fraud Polling Analysis: The Urban Legend ( TIA )

Election Fraud Polling Analysis: Confirmation of a Kerry Landslide

by TruthIsAll    http://www.geocities.com/electionmodel/FurtherConfirmationOfaKerryLandslide.htm

Introduction: To Believe Bush Won...

  1. When Decided
  2. Bush Approval Ratings
  3. The Final 5 Million Recorded Votes
  4. The Final Exit Poll: Forced to Match the Vote
  5. Within Precinct Discrepancy
  6. New Voters
  7. Party ID
  8. Gender
  9. Implausible Gore Voter Defection
  10. Voter Turnout
  11. Urban Legend
    Election 2004: The Urban Legend by Michael Collins (autorank) provides convincing evidence that Bush’s urban vote shares were implausible.

    The purpose of this analysis is to provide additional support for Collins’ findings. The focus is on the National Exit Poll location-size and regional demographic categories. We will look at the Final 2000 NEP, the 2004 NEP (updated at 7:33pm on Election Day) and the Final 2004 NEP (updated at 2pm the following day). Since the Final NEP is matched to the recorded vote, it can be used to show that the changes in Bush urban and suburban vote shares from 2000 were implausible. In addition, a detailed table of changes in the recorded New York county vote provides further confirmation that the Bush “mandate” is a myth. ...
  12. Location Size
  13. Sensitivity Analysis
  14. Did Kerry Win 360 EV?
  15. Election Simulation Analysis
  16. Exit Poll Response Optimization
  17. Uncounted and Switched Votes
  18. Florida
  19. Ohio
  20. New York

Appendix

  1. Election Model: Nov.1 Projection
  2. Interactive Monte Carlo Simulation: Pre-election and Exit Polls
  3. 1988-2004 Election Calculator: The True Vote
  4. The 2000-2004 County Vote Database
  5. Statistics and Probability: Mathematics of Polling





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Cool!
:applause:



























































Now what?

:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. k!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kick.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuadrangular Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Question is: Why didn't Kerry protest
Wouldn't it make sense to expect Kerry to make a big fuzz out of all this if he had been robbed? Just saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Shark Donating Member (225 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Because John Forbes "Howdy reporting for Duty" Kerry II...
...got punked by the Commander-in-Thief

...This...AFTER (s)Election 2000, and AFTER promising to count every vote, all so he could keep his powder dry for 2008.

...Bwaaaaahahahaaaaaaahhahahahaaaa!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC