dbonds
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-17-04 08:39 PM
Original message |
| Did anyone save that AP report posted weeks before the election |
|
about Bush winning? I was wondering how close that turned out.
|
| flowomo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-17-04 08:54 PM
Response to Original message |
|
the other day! But it wasn't that close as I recall.
|
| flowomo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-17-04 08:59 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. wait! I do have it.... |
|
It says Bush won 47-43 in the popular vote, and got 324 electoral votes in 33 states and was leading in 4 more.
|
| drunkdriver-in-chief
(267 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-17-04 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. 47-43? So they thought nader would get 10% - ? |
|
If those 10% were undecideds then hell with the poll - it was useless.
|
| dbonds
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-17-04 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 4. Ah, that wasnt even ball park. |
| Matariki
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-17-04 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
i gotta say, i use dummy type all the time as page place holders. but as a kinda paranoid person i checked that page with the real results too. my verdict - page placeholder.
|
| flowomo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-17-04 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 6. definitely a dummy.... |
|
and most people realized that at the time... the bogus numbers... which did not come close to adding up to 100% just show they were plugging in numbers to fill the space. Picking Bush wasn't smart as a public relations matter... they shudda had it a tie or something.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:46 PM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
