Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Everyone does realize that Kerry just needs to get within

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
RawMaterials Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 02:44 PM
Original message
Everyone does realize that Kerry just needs to get within
45000 votes in Ohio to have an automatic recount.
this should happen, after all the provo votes are counted.

plus with the news that Kerry is just starting to get involved legally
things might get interesting from now till the 13th when the electoral college votes. maybe he waited till now for the most momentum going into the 13th?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. How do you know that?
"this should happen, after all the provo votes are counted" ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RawMaterials Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. just speculation but Kerry got and extra
10000 in chyahoga county plus the 4000 over votes that didn't count in guana(small town outside Columbus), plus the warren county locked out media during there original count(they gave 40000 or so to bush), maybe i just have a little faith but it could happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm sorry
but Kerry has conceded. I don't think he's going to unconcede at this juncture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Cosidering his legal team is getting in on the recount action...
...I wouldn't count him out of the picture yet. His concession is not legally binding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malatesta1137 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. it's MORALLY binding however
he gave up an fled. This new filing is a formality to counter criticism from the left. It's not going anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shalom Donating Member (832 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. Not Morally Binding When Other Side Cheats, Lies, and Steals
Kerry did not flee - we are better off that he is acting formally now that we have a basis to file papers.

1. Kerry fought with his heart and soul, beat bush in 3 debates, and won the election.

2. Bush stole the trophy.

3. We are helping Kerry win back what he won.

This is a legal process that will proceed regardless of our opinion. If you think it is going nowhere, it would have gone nowhere if Kerry filed weeks ago.

Everyone else feels this is progress - whey don't you ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malatesta1137 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #30
46. This is NOT progress
It's a waste of time and worthless. Look at Ukraine and learn.

And so far, yes, Kerry did flee. He knew Bush was going to steal MONTHS AND MONTHS ago, and yet did nothing.

Legal processes in America are a waste of time, courts are corrupted by Republicans, especially the Supreme Court, or did you forget 2000?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndrewClarke Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. automatic
. . . means just that. A concession would have nothing to do with it.

It doesn't matter anyway--there's going to be a recount, thanks to Cobb and Badnarik.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Gore had conceded at first too, it means nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
41. You don't have to unconcede if the votes show you won
the election in a state - the electoral votes go to you any way and if you have enough electoral votes, you win the election.

THERE IS NOTHING BINDING ABOUT A CONCESSION!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kerry is closing in on him in Ohio.
I think you are right about the timing. I think they know what they are doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. The numbers of the provisionals so far haven't shown it getting anywhere
near that close - do you know what it is at now?

This morning I thought Kerry had only picked up around 8,000 votes on *.

I hope you are right, but how many provisional are even left to be analyzed and counted or thrown out?

I have been disappointed that we hadn't picked up more during the count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. remember what jesse jackson said yesterday!!
yesterday jesse jackson said ..on the day kerry conceeded he was told by blakwell what the numbers of kerry 's loss was..but jackson said...how do we know what those numbers really were???

yeah we have all heard the 136,000 vote ..but yesterday jackson let something slip..or was it on purpose...that how do we or kerry know those numbers were correct???

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Haven't we been saying...
It is all about the timing!!!!

We frame the debate and we set the time frame to expose it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. yes, we have, aren't we good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kerry doesn't let things just drift. Loose lips and all that.
He may surprise some people here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. I agree, I look forward to his surprise
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. I've always said it's like in Caddyshack
At the end, when Brian Doyle Murray is waiting and watching for the ball to fall in the cup, with the golf course blowing up all around him.

Count the votes, drip, drip, drip...

Go Team!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Once again, you find just the right movie comparison...
....and I appreciate the smile I'm now enjoying. Thanks.

Peace.

"I Delcare The Election Invalid: Someone I do not know was prevented from voting"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndrewClarke Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. recount
They don't need an automatic recount; a recount has already been contested.

There aren't enough provisional ballots left to get Kerry within 45,000 anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RawMaterials Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Blackwell is taking his sweet ass time with everything. n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melodybe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Well when they found the extra 93,000 Bush votes
that helped Kerry out a good bit.

They completely padded Bush's popular vote, 20,000 here 40,000 there. It adds up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
38. Get your facts straight
A recount has not been contested! Having the recount early has been contested Mr. "I know it All" Andrew Clarke. The SoS, Ken Blackwell even said there would be one the other night.

Read the article:
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/nationworld/sfl-aohio30nov30,0,4578589.story?coll=sfla-news-nationworld
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrUnderhill Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
18. Kerry has only picked up ~5400 votes with 79 of 88 counties reporting.
Edited on Wed Dec-01-04 03:04 PM by MrUnderhill
There aren't enough provisional/absentee votes left to come anywhere near a 45000 vote recount threshold.

http://www.ohvotesuppression.blogspot.com

The website says "some of the largest counties have still not reported" - but based on the statistics they post (and assuming a continued 78% acceptance rate), there are only around 18000 votes left to be counted. Even if Kerry wins them all he's still down by around 110,000 votes. And he's not going to win them all... he's likely to pick up around 5000 more votes total and come up about 125,000 votes.


On edit - It's worse than I thought. Cuyahoga is already in and accounts for about 9,000 votes gained for Kerry (in other words, Bush actually gained about 3000 votes in the rest of the state). The remaining counties may be a wash.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewulf Donating Member (156 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #18
40. 78%!?!
How did the acceptance rate get so low? Wasn't it ~90% in 2000? I also remember something in the 85% last month... Hm...

I wonder what percentage of the rejected provisionals were for Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrUnderhill Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #40
45. 78% is actually pretty high nationally
It probably dropped off because of the high number of first time voters. A higher percentage of which probably didn't understand how to vote.

It could also be the number of voters who hadn't voted in years. They may not have understood that they need to re-register if they haven't voted in a certain number of years (8?) and thought they were still registered.

I'm not going to make an assumption on the partisan breakdown of rejected ballots because:

1) We've been burned on these assumptions before - most recently the assumption that the VALID provisionals would break heavily toward Kerry and,

2) Many of these assumptions always seem to me to rest on the notion that minorities are "stupider" than the rest of us and therefore are more likely to do it wrong. I have a problem with that.

That having been said... a couple counties with HIGHER rejection rates (Cuyahoga) WERE heavy Kerry counties, so even a breakdown along the lines of each county's ballots would give Kerry a couple thousand extra votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
19. getting within 45k votes by the provisionals is not likely
Bush was leading by about 130,000. There were about 155K provisionals. And about 76% are being considered valid: so that leaves approximately 120K ballots. To reach a 45,000 differential then Kerry needs a 85,000(130K -85K) lead in the provisionals. That means we want K - B = 85,000 and K + B = 120,000, solving for K, we get K = 102.5K and B= 17.5K. So Kerry needs 85.4% of the provisionals, which is probably too much to be expected given that many ballots are from conservative counties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truthbeknown Donating Member (152 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
20. Prove election fraud
and those votes don't matter.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RawMaterials Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. what happens if election fraud is proved?
if bush is responsible then its voter gate, but if he is not is there a re-vote or would the electoral college just vote differently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truthbeknown Donating Member (152 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Re-Vote,I think,but not sure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. The candidate is responsible for their campaign
Bush is directly responsible for any wrongdoing by any of the people that worked for him. Blackwell was his the co-chair of his Campaign in OH. He isn't just some low level staffer. He has a direct connection to the top of the ticket.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrUnderhill Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #21
33. Neither.
The electoral college slate could not be switched to Kerry without the state certifying a different result (virtually impossible at this point). And a re-vote is not legally possible either.

At best, the votes would be contested in the congress and THEY would decide who to seat (if anyone). I think we already know how THAT would turn out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malatesta1137 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. who are you going to prove it to?
the mobsters on the Supreme Court, they will all laugh at you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peter Frank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. ...'who are you going to prove it to?'...

Prove it to the American people, and the courts will have to take it seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malatesta1137 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #28
44. like they took seriously in 2000
don't make me laugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #26
34. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Peter Frank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. I'm an Independent.

This issue has nothing to do with party affiliation. Go to http://www.blackboxvoting.org and see for yourself -- the nature of the irregularities & how the machines could have been hacked via modem. ...And pay close attention to the physical evidence of outright fraud in Volusia County, Fla.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrUnderhill Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. If we had picked Lieberman... what would have been the difference?
We could have nominated Zell Miller and gotten HIM elected in a snap too...


But I think we prefered an actual Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. you do realize you are now spamming
that is about the 4th thread you have posted the same shit in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peter Frank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. Exactly...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. You voted for Bush?!?!
Get the fuck out of here!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Right on!!!
I second that -- I like your fire!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colonel odis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
25. we'll be "attacked" by "terrorists" if ohio comes close to going for kerry
you can bet the farm on it.

if it looks like there's a serious challenge to bush's alleged re-election, all hell will break loose. there's no way those people are going to let power slip from their fat, sweaty, little hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. Bright, Flashing Red, Baby!!!
The light will turn so fast, you'll still be in the middle of the intersection while it's happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
29. Kerry, the.....
....closer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
righteous1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
32. It's .25% not .5%
It's .25% for statewide elections .5 for local. works out to be ~15,000votes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 03:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC