Windy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-25-09 12:18 PM
Original message |
Clint Eastwood was robbed. He should have gotten a nomination for Grand Torino |
|
I saw it last night and it was very poignant. I highly recommend it. It tugs on every emotion and is shocking, humorous and tragic all at once.
|
GodlessBiker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-25-09 12:21 PM
Response to Original message |
1. It was good, but he played his usual "Angry Old Dude" role. |
MISSDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-16-09 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
13. In what other movies was he an "angry old dude"? |
|
I love Clint in his many roles but don't remember this.
|
Darth_Kitten
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-25-09 12:24 PM
Response to Original message |
2. 1/2 of the Screen Actors Guild wuz robbed. |
Iterate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-25-09 12:32 PM
Response to Original message |
3. It deserves recognition. |
|
I saw it last night as well. Though it's not on a level with "Unforgiven", it's certainly one of his better films and well worthwhile.
|
jobycom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-25-09 12:32 PM
Response to Original message |
4. This is one of the strongest fields in years. You could make that case for several actors. |
|
Eastwood has played a very similar character very well for forty years, so I guess voters passed him over this time.
|
shrike
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-25-09 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Yes, it was a strong field |
|
I haven't seen "Doubt" yet, but I'm told Philip Seymour Hoffman was wonderful.
In a different year, Clint would have been nominated. The competition this year was just too strong.
|
DS1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-25-09 01:43 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Clint was good, but it was a tired old tale that's been done a thousand times before |
ProgressiveProfessor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-25-09 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. GT was not a Dirty Harry film, and was better than many out there today |
mackerel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-27-09 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. Someone suggested he missed the release date. |
MTmix86
(6 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-04-09 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
im terrified of Clint Eastwood... good Gorillaz song though... haha
|
crimsonblue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-10-09 05:07 PM
Response to Original message |
10. I think this was Eastwood's best film portraying the Dirty Harry / Man with no name persona |
|
Edited on Tue Feb-10-09 05:08 PM by crimsonblue
However, the acting by the Hmong characters was sub-par, especially the boy. When he was screaming after being locked in the basement, it was completely unbelievable and really hurt the entire movie. That being said, Eastwood was simply amazing. He doesn't seem to be acting; rather, he is his characters.
|
a kennedy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-16-09 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. I kinda thought all the characters were sub-par, Clint included |
|
It was a good movie, but nothing great......
|
Lydia Leftcoast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-16-09 05:29 PM
Response to Original message |
12. You know who else was robbed? |
|
Richard Dreyfus should have gotten a Best Supporting Actor nomination for his deadly accurate portrayal of Dick Cheney in "W."
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 06:43 AM
Response to Original message |