Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In light of the Rapture hoax, what exactly is the line between respectable religion and dangerous

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 05:38 PM
Original message
In light of the Rapture hoax, what exactly is the line between respectable religion and dangerous
cults?

I'm not even being facetious here. We give a lot of established religions a certain amount of respect that we don't feel as obligated to give the more newly minted ones.

This reminds me of why I think the old ones should be treated like the new ones rather than vice versa.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think DU should respectfully place all religion posts in the Religion forum
respectfully
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Respectfully, I think you should use the hide thread function.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-11 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
21. Could you define "respect"
Is it that religious ideas can be challenged but without mocking or belittling language.
Or that we should accept what people say and not ask them to defend their statements?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mr blur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. They're ALL dangerous. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Thank you. Precisely.
Anytime you have any force that encourages you to believe in things that aren't even logical, that encourage belief ahead of thought, it becomes dangerous. God will not save us from another great flood, contrary to John Shimcus(R-IL)who stood up and proclaimed so. He can't save us from our own stupidity.

Time to forget about religion and bank on thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. +100
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catabryna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. This really belongs in the R/T forum...
as a side note... your avatar is gone. Was it raptured? :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. some religions have tons of weird rituals
and they have to eat food that is labeled as pure or something. Its just bizarre, but some religions are more respected than others, because I know it wouldn't be tolerated on DU to make fun of a certain religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Christianity's central ritual is a form of imaginary cannibalism.
Edited on Sat May-21-11 06:17 PM by Tesha
That's pretty weird, isn't it?

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yea, so is having to eat particular food
labeled as "OK by God" to eat, or having some elaborate ritual to go through when you turn a certain age.

I find that stuff laughable to be honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. You can actually understand some of the dietary laws.
Shellfish, unless very fresh, can be bacteriologically
dangerous.

During Red Tides, shellfish can be toxic, period.

Pigs carry Trichinosis.

Perhaps someone noticed that dairy products could be
cross-contaminated from meats.

Kosher/Halal ritual butchering was probably the most-
humane way of dispatching animals known at the time.
And warm blood spoils easily, hence the whole "draining
out" thing.

Then, of course, all this reasonably-good sense got
wrapped up in mythology. And over the years, the
mythology piled deep.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Agreed and Kosher also minimizes the chance of Salmonella
As I understand it, it is not Kosher to eat the "rear half" of the animal...

Clams, oysters and mollusks are nature's filtering units: they take in all the pollutants at the bottom of the bay which accumulate inside their meat. I'm over 50, not a member of any "organized" religion and have never eaten any of those creatures... by choice and by using logic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. There isn't one n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. Unless we change history - you probably wouldn't be able form a lot of subversive cute thoughts
Without old school liturgical religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogmarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. I wonder how many people will take
Edited on Sat May-21-11 06:46 PM by frogmarch
advantage of the chance to off their spouses and claim they were sucked into heaven.

If America was a theocracy run by Christian fundamentalist wackos, including Rapturists, would law enforcement investigate such rapture claims as missing person cases, and if the missing person, or his/her body, or evidence of foul play couldn't be found, would law enforcement be compelled by law to accept that the missing spouses had been raptured?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Sprat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
15. The line was crossed a little over 3 decades ago.
The 700 club and evangelicals turned churches into political arms of the GOP, just like FauxNews is today. Suddenly, Christ was portrayed as businessman loving money and greed instead of the polar opposite teacher of the Beatitudes. I even recall hearing a Presbyterian pastor urging the members to invest in stocks in the 90s, so they might have more to contribute to the church. I'm sure they disgusted thousands or millions who had at one time trusted the mainstream churches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
16. This crackpot Camping
Edited on Sat May-21-11 07:03 PM by Mz Pip
got his $72 million dollars for someplace - probably from people he fleeced with his nonsense. I wouldn't be surprise if there were people who donated their life savings to him to help him spread the word with those damn billboards.

He doesn't deserve any respect IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cleanhippie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. What makes Camping a crackpot, but not the Pope or any other priest?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. they're all crooks and con artists.
Camping is simply more famous and richer than most.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Won't make excuses
for the Pope or for Franklin Graham or Pat Robertson or anyone else who uses people to fill their coffers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cleanhippie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
20. It wasn't a hoax. The belief in the Rapture is JUST as legitimate as any other religious claim.
Including resurrection, transubstantiation, divinity, heaven, hell, etc.


If you think one is a hoax, then they are ALL a hoax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
22. Check this out:
The Advanced Bonewitz Cult Danger Evaluation Frame:

http://neopagan.net/ABCDEF.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
23. where is the line between respectable person and dangerous wacko?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
24. Congregation size. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
25. Mr Laurel and I were discussing this yesterday at dinner
I look forward to seeing others' opinions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
26. where is the line between respectable science and dangerous wackoism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-11 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
27. Dangerous cults have outlandish claims and prejudices that are not widely accepted.
The practical upshot to that is that widely accepted beliefs cannot be so antithetical to reality as to prevent the belief system from enduring. For instance, reading the New Testament, one might be persuaded to give up all possessions and eek out a barely sustainable existance in the desert preaching and eating bugs while waiting for Jesus to return. Well, some of the 1st generation Christians did just that. When they were gone, there was no second generation to take over. It's kind of like how societies who don't maintain some kind of marshal ethos end up being taken over by more aggressive societies.

While I think even mainstream religious claims are still pretty disfunctional, they are not so antithetical to society as to be suicidal. A serious belief that the world is about to end and that allowing it end is a good thing is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC