Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

1 assumption, 1 f act and one conclusion

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
Niccolo_Macchiavelli Donating Member (641 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 12:46 PM
Original message
1 assumption, 1 f act and one conclusion
Edited on Sun Dec-26-04 12:49 PM by Niccolo_Macchiavelli
Ok lets all hold our nose and ASSUME there is something like "Intelligent Design"

Fundi assumption: Good designed us the way he wanted.(as opposed try-and-error-evolution).

Fact: There are miscarriages

Conclusion: God is pro-abortion?


Well you won't convince educated people with this... but you can tease Fundies....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. way back that was what women said to each other - 'it was meant to be'

speaking of miscarriage


it was nature's way not to spend energy on what cannot survive.

after all survival is the name of the game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kc.ink Donating Member (180 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Perception & interpretation . . . . . . .
1. Belief: God designed humans in His own image.
2. There are miscarriages.
3. Interpretation depends upon truth and knowledge.
4. Abortion is killing.

eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 12:55 PM
Original message
I point to miscarriages too
but on further thought, the answer is obvious. God gives life and God can take it away. We, on the other hand, should not try to play God.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Alternative...
God designed man in his own image.

We are dumb.

Therefore God is dumb. (And a little ugly on the side.)

(Credit to Frank Zappa)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Zappa should be old enough
to remember that there used to be a difference between "dumb" and "stupid". Dumb originally meant the same as "mute", that is unable to talk. Stupid is not the same thing, since "some people without brains do an awful lot of talking".
I cannot quote it exactly, but I still like that little speech from Vonnegut's "Player Piano".
It says something like "sometimes people are stupid, sometimes they are brilliant" (meaning the same people, not dividing humanity into classes).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Well, he's dead, and so not likely to ammend his grammar now!
And it was in third person in the song, and stupid would not have sounded right in the context.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. poetic license n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. as miscarriages often happen because something is wrong with the fetus
one could say God is against children with special needs and health problems

they weren't good enough to be born...

lots of ways of spinning it.

if one wanted to, that is...

O8)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phylny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Interesting observation
When I miscarried twins, early on in pregnancy, one of the doctors told me, "Don't feel badly. This is your body, working exactly as it should."

Now, I don't believe that God doesn't love handicapped people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I was just going along with the "logic"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phylny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I understand! :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. It proves again womens role is hard due to The Original Sin
You know, anything that is hard for a female is because of this. Jesus died to save us from our sins. Eve (created from Adam's rib after kicking Lillith, the original woman who was outspoken and equal to man, out of Eden) was created to gie fundies a reason to disallow women their rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlackJawedYokel Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. Playing along :D
Fundi assumption: Good designed us the way he wanted.(as opposed try-and-error-evolution).
Damn, this "god" person sure has a weird sense of humor then...I mean, have you *seen* our plumbing?
:D

Fact: There are miscarriages
Not only are there miscarriages but *way* less than 50%(I've read as low as 20%) of all fertilized eggs make it to birth.
In fact, most miscarriages happen well before any woman knows or could know she was pregnant in that the zygotes simply don't even implant because they are genetically incompatible with life.

Conclusion: God is pro-abortion?
Ah the logical conundrums inherent to the omni-powerful "god".
Such a god would not only be pro-abortion, but pro-painful death, pro-abuse, pro-everything bad/evil since by allowing such things to take place when *by definition* it is capable of taking action(what *is* the point of being omni-powerful if one doesn't act?), it is culpable in that evil.

Well you won't convince educated people with this... but you can tease Fundies....
Isn't that the point?
:D

Cletus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Your statistics are also valuable for the claim that abortion causes
breast cancer. There is absolutely no way to verify the statistical groups of women who developed or did not develop breast cancer after a such a brief pregnancy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlackJawedYokel Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. How completely wrong.
Your statistics are also valuable for the claim that abortion causes breast cancer.
Aside from the fact that a 65,000 woman cohort study done on nurses completley disproved that piece of proganda, how do you figure that one?

There is absolutely no way to verify the statistical groups of women who developed or did not develop breast cancer after a such a brief pregnancy.
Which categorizes such a claim as "statistically insignificant".

IIRC, a preganancy is defined as the implantation, not merely the conception, of a zygote.
So those women who conceive but don't implant aren't pregnant.

Cletus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
10. What kind of intelligent design would include AIDS babies,
the Holocaust, serial killers, Tay-Sachs, abused children kept in cages, tsunamis, etc.?

If there is a God, it's way, way, way beyond my limited understanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indigobusiness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Spinoza's version...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=214x3580

'...Spinoza contended that "God" and "Nature" were two names for the same reality, namely the single substance that underlies the universe and of which all lesser "entities" are actually modes or modifications. He contended that "Deus sive Natura" ("God or Nature") was a being of infinitely many attributes, of which extension and thought were two. His account of the nature of reality, then, seems to treat the physical and mental worlds as two different, parallel "subworlds" that neither overlap nor interact. This formulation is a historically significant panpsychist solution to the mind-body problem known as neutral monism...'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. a miscarriage is a miscarriage

the woman's body decided it could not sustain the fetus any longer. the woman's conscious brain had nothing to do with it. nor her will power. nor any god's will power. her body made the decision. that's nature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indigobusiness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Yes, but some things judged as "bad" from a limited perspective
are differently perceived from a greater one.

Who would pretend to comprehend the big picture or the full scope of reality?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikepallas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. Interesting. Food for thought if nothing else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
19. Worse conclusion
The goal is to get to heaven.

Original sin damns those that do not except Jesus as their saviour.

A special consideration is made for those under a certain age.

Dead babies go to heaven.

Raising a child risks them rejecting Jesus.

The logical conclusion of this is horrendous. But it is a valid interpretation of some versions of Fundamentalist Christian concepts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUDUing2 Donating Member (968 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
20. I think you are not quite getting what intelligent design is..
Edited on Mon Dec-27-04 09:48 AM by RUDUing2
it doesn't mean God micro-managed..

It simply means that there is a supreme deity that set the process into place..

Some believe that God then continued working on creation (but even there different beliefs exist as to what degree)...but others believe that supreme deity put things into motion and let it go...

As for where the supreme deity came from? Same place that those who don't believe in a supreme deity believe the matter came from that set the process into motion..

Just as an atheist simply believes in one less deity then a christian in regards to Gods, etc..a religious believer believes in one more step then a atheist in regards to creation of the universe, etc...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC