hasbro
(258 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-09-05 03:28 AM
Original message |
|
http://www.denverpost.com/avalanche/ci_2925079Bettman just wanted to assure everybody the NHL is still a bush league.
|
getmeouttahere
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-09-05 09:15 AM
Response to Original message |
|
it's not like they were going to keep on suspension forever. He's even on probation now, thanks to unprecedented charges brought against him. There are dozens of cases of violence over the years in the NHL where charges could have been brought against an individual. It's time to move on.
|
hasbro
(258 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-10-05 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
The charges are far from unprecidented.
|
getmeouttahere
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-10-05 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Eddie Shore and Ace Bailey... |
|
"On December 12, 1933, in an intense contest against the Toronto Maple Leafs, Shore, looking for revenge, belted Toronto's Ace Bailey from behind. The hit knocked the Leafs' star unconscious, and rushed to the hospital, his life hung in the balance for two weeks. Doctors performed emergency surgery on Bailey to relieve the preessure on his brain. Ace lived, but was never able to play again."
"On February 14, 1934, the National Hockey League staged an all-star game, with proceeds benefiting Bailey's rehabilitation. The crowd erupted in spontaneous cheering when Bailey, in his street clothes, met Shore, dressed in his hockey equipment ready for the game, at centre ice. Bailey extended his hand to Shore and handed him an all-star sweater with number 2. The two shook hands and the hatchet was buried."
Even with a "legal" hit, terrible things can happen. I just hope someday Moore can forgive Bertuzzi.
|
hasbro
(258 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-10-05 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. One key difference there |
|
Shore went to some effort to see to it that Ace got compensated.
Would have been great if the Canucks would have and could forgive Moore.
|
MrSlayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-14-05 06:11 PM
Response to Original message |
5. What Bert did was cheap and uncalled for. |
|
But I don't think they should have banned him for life. Hockey is raw emotion and sometimes it goes over the line. While he did want to hurt Moore I don't believe he wanted to break his neck. I blame a lot of this on the stupid instigator rule which forces cheap shots instead of allowing the players to police themselves with straight up fisticuffs.
|
Telly Savalas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-14-05 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Bertuzzi was afraid of violating the instigator rule... |
MrSlayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-15-05 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
I'm saying that rule fosters cheapshots and stickwork. If that rule hadn't been in effect, in an earlier point of the game, Bert or someone else could have gotten even for the cheap shot against Naslund in a fair way without being thrown out. He wouldn't have had to wait until the game was out of hand. I am in no way defending what he did but I think it could have been avoided.
|
hasbro
(258 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-16-05 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. That's a myth about the score |
|
The Canucks didn't do anything at an interviening game in Denver and there were two fighting majors (one with Moore) in the game in question when the score was still 0-0.
|
getmeouttahere
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-15-05 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. Probably the same for McSorley... |
|
I honestly don't understand why the league insists on that rule.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:40 PM
Response to Original message |