Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Choice We Don't Want (black rights vs. gay rights)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
kweerwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 09:34 AM
Original message
A Choice We Don't Want (black rights vs. gay rights)
Edited on Tue Aug-23-05 09:37 AM by kweerwolf
There is a long-standing debate as to whether the black civil rights movement and the gay rights movement are related. While there are unquestionable differences, one undisputed parallel has yet to be highlighted; there is a current discussion within the Democratic Party as to whether supporting gay rights is politically viable, just as there was a similar discussion about supporting the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (not to mention, acceptance of interracial marriage). The argument can be made (and heavily defended) that the Democratic stronghold in the South began to crumble due to the Democratic Party's embrace of civil rights. This erosion of support for Democrats, with the South now a major base of the Republican Party, can be looked at as a political disaster for the Democrats. Yet no one questions whether the promotion of civil rights was the right thing to do.

Now there is a new prominent civil rights issue, gay rights, which the African-American community is playing an indirect, yet integral part in. Many Democratic policy makers worry about losing black voters over the gay rights issue. A very religious bloc (albeit a historically socially progressive, religious bloc), the black community is increasingly split over the acceptance of gay rights by the Democratic Party. And there are many Democratic leaders who fear the alienation of their ever-faithful black voting contingent if gay rights become a major part of the party platform (which, regardless of how the issue is exploited by either side, it is not already).

A recent uproar over an especially harsh and anti-gay pulpit speech by the prominent black D.C. Baptist Rev. Willie Wilson has brought this issue to light. After much pressure, Wilson has since apologized for his remarks, but his initial hard-line stance has illuminated a growing gap within the African-American community. There are those who see equality for gays and lesbians as an important part of the civil rights debate and those who maintain that homosexuality is a sin and should be treated as such. There are many studies on homophobia in black communities in the United States, and it seems that this homophobic sentiment is just as much a social stigma as it is a religious attitude. Yet if gay rights can be framed a religious issue before LGBT activists can frame it an equal rights issue, there may never be a chance to form a true alliance between the LGBT community and the black community. If this becomes a reality the Democratic Party will be forced to make a choice: fully embrace homosexual equality or continue a vague promotion of tolerance. The first is the right thing to do but the second may be the more politically viable option. Let us then avoid this choice. Let us open a dialogue now and show each other how much we can help one another. It is certainly true that the civil rights struggle of the mid-20th century was much different than the struggle for equality at the beginning of the 21st century. Yet a fuller discussion of why these movements are different will lead to a deeper understanding of how similar the ultimate goal is for both, equal rights and justice for all.

http://www.thedartmouth.com/article.php?aid=2005082302010
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. it's not a choice
you are either FOR civil rights for all Americans, or you are republican.

who cares if you're black or gay or purple with green stripes - if someone wants to vote to remove rights and freedoms or to keep rights and freedoms from some Americans, then they are not real democrats and we don't need them.

This is a "big tent" party, and it can accommodate many many different people and different kinds of people on the premise of human decency and social responsibility.

But this is a blue tent. If we need to start changing the color of the tent to attract people with "red" values, then it will no longer be a blue tent.

If it is indistinguishable from the red tent, then we have status quo, the republicans will remain, either as republicans or acceptable DLC candidates.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC