WillParkinson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-10 03:43 PM
Original message |
Who is the bigger threat to marriage? |
|
Someone posted this on a board that I frequent and I really thought it was great.
"How come convicted felons in this society can marry but committed loving same sex couples cannot? How come a dual sex couple can marry 10 mins after meeting at a bar but a commited same sex couple cannot after being together for 6 years? If anyone is going to destroy traditional marriage as an institution, it will be hets." --girlgamer
|
JuniperLea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-10 03:45 PM
Response to Original message |
1. There's only one threat to marriage... |
|
Divorce. When they outlaw divorce, then we can talk.
|
JustFiveMoreMinutes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-10 03:55 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Actually it's women working outside the home and having access to the public |
|
... cause they can go 'shopping' at anytime and are not 'beholden' to a man's salary and support to sustain themselves.
Darn women's rights!
hahhahahahahahahahahahhahahaha
I AM KIDDING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
EmeraldCityGrl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-10 04:08 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Should same sex convicted felons be allowed to marry? |
|
Seems you should be able to make your argument without denigrating another group to do it.
|
WillParkinson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-10 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
But it is valid just the same. People who have been in prison can marry (even people currently in prison can marry). I've been with my partner 24 years and we just got married in April.
|
Creideiki
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-10 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. What a wonderful and valid point! |
|
Thank you so much for coming here to tell us LGBTers that!
|
Duncan Grant
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-10 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
7. Now the gays are denigrating felons! When will this shit end? |
|
Q: Should same sex convicted felons be allowed to marry? A: Yes.
Are you going to say we're denigrating Britney Spears when we point out her marriage privilege/history? Project much?
Jeez. :eyes:
|
WillParkinson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-10 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
8. Perhaps this will help get the point across... |
|
Edited on Fri Oct-29-10 05:53 PM by WillParkinson
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWA3YV7eOvwOn edit: Thank you to the person who sent me the link. Because, you know, marriage is such a sacred institution.
|
EmeraldCityGrl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-10 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. I'd like to first congratulate you |
|
on your recent marriage and wish you many happy years ahead.
I have worked with convicted felons, many convicted due to archaic drug laws. They may be allowed to marry, but many if not most are denied the right to vote, to earn a living or rent a place to live. Although they have paid dearly for their crimes most continue to pay for the remainder of their lives. Using "convicted felons" as an example for the civil rights denied the LGBT community strikes me as being below the standards of reasoning I have come to expect from the community.
I personally don't believe marriage to be the sacred institution it's cracked up to be, but I certainly would fight for your right to it.
|
lightningandsnow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-10 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. Thank you for posting this. |
|
People forget that the prison industrial complex disproportionally affects queer and trans people.
|
RetiredTrotskyite
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-31-10 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
15. Sorry, But...Oh wait, I'm NOT Sorry! |
|
If felons can marry and we cannot, there is something very wrong with this picture.
|
dgibby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-10 04:27 PM
Response to Original message |
4. The only threat to heterosexual marriage is heterosexuals. n/t |
lightningandsnow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-10 10:13 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Nice defense of the prison-industrial complex, there. |
|
I get what you are saying, but advocating taking away even more rights from "convicted felons", even in jest, is directly supporting a system which marginalizes queer and trans people every day. Did you know that a lot of the convicts you are talking about are trans women thrown in (men's) prison for doing sex work to survive? A lot of them are homeless LGBTQ youth. A lot of them are people who dared to defend themselves against homophobic and transphobic violence, like the New Jersey Four.
I'm always saddened but never shocked to see privileged LGBTQ people defending the very systems that oppress us.
|
WillParkinson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-30-10 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. Advocating taking away more rights? |
|
Please tell me where I did that. First off, I said this was not my opinion, but it makes a valid point. Straight people in prison are allowed to be married, even those who have raped, tortured and killed other people. Gays and lesbians are not allowed. Gays and lesbians in prison are still not allowed to be married.
Nowhere did I say take away the right to marriage for anyone. Nowhere did I defend the prison system. And please be careful using the phrase 'privileged LGTBQ people' without saying exactly what our 'privileges' are.
|
lightningandsnow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-30-10 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. Well, for one thing... |
|
you keep promoting the idea that everyone convicted of a crime is a rapist or murderer. This is not true. Many of the people in prison are in there for drug crimes, sex work, or petty theft. In fact, the people you are talking about are a tiny proportion of the prison population.
And I stand behind the "privileged" assumption. Are you male? Are you white? Are you financially comfortable? Are you able-bodied? Are you cisgender? Depending on which of these apply to you, you may have male, white, class, able-bodied, and/or cisgender privilege. "Gay" is not the be all and end all. I myself am privileged; even though I am a queer woman with a disability, I have white, class, and cisgender privilege. And something tells me that if you were a working-class person of colour, where people like you are extremely over-represented in the prison system, you wouldn't be tossing the words "convicted felon" around so lightly.
|
WillParkinson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-30-10 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
|
Talk about taking something the way you want.
I never said that all prisoners were rapists and murderers.
Yes, I'm male. Yes, I'm white. No, I'm not financially comfortable. We both live paycheck to paycheck. No, I'm not able bodied. I have may problems that impact my ability to do my job, which just get worse over time. But, hey, thanks for asking or making assumptions.
Anyway, thank you for your input. It's duly noted, if not overreaching.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 06:40 PM
Response to Original message |