Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jim Neal, 2 others arrested in pro-gay rights action at General Assembly

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 08:35 PM
Original message
Jim Neal, 2 others arrested in pro-gay rights action at General Assembly
http://www.indyweek.com/citizen/archives/2011/06/02/jim-neal-2-others-arrested-in-pro-gay-rights-action-at-general-assembly


WRAL is reporting that Jim Neal, a candidate for U.S. Senate in the 2008 Democratic primary, was one of three pro-gay rights demonstrators arrested today at the General Assembly. They went on the House floor while the chamber was in session and called for "liberty and justice for all" — whereupon they were removed.

Neal was among the speakers at a rally earlier outside the legislative building. The rally was sponsored by a California-based group called Get Equal with a new N.C. state chapter. (The rally started late and I needed to leave, so I didn't hear Neal speak. About 200 people attended.)



Equality NC members were also on hand distributing literature in opposition to the proposed DOMA constitutional amendment — Senate Bill 106/House Bill 777. The amendment wouldn't change existing N.C. law, but it would write prejudice into the state constitution — if the voters approve it. But first, two-thirds of the members of both houses of the General Assembly must vote for it. (Gov. Bev Perdue cannot veto a proposed constitutional amendment.)

I see on ENC's website that its executive director, Ian Palmquist, tweeted something about today's action:
"While we share the protesters' passion for equal rights, we cannot condone today's disruption of the House session."

According to the General Assembly's website and ENC, Senate Bill 106 has 23 sponsors, all Republicans. In the Senate, 30 our of the total 50 votes would be needed for approval. House Bill 777, which is nearly identical, has 66 sponsors, 60 Republicans and six Democrats. In the House, 72 votes out of the total 120 would be needed for approval.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. assuming they get all their caucus
then we are dead in the water. They only need 5 Democratic votes to get the super majority needed if they hold their entire caucus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HillWilliam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm grateful they have so much time to spend on this issue
since they've already solved unemployment and environmental issues...

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC